Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court

American Political Science Review

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 1109-1127

  Caldeira, Gregory A ^a   Wright, John R ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934564270     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1961752     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Armstrong Virginia, and Johnson Charles A. 1982. “Certiorari Decision Making by the Warren and Burger Courts: Is Cue Theory Time Bound?” Polity 15: 141–50.
2. Baker Stewart. 1984. “A Practical Guide to Certiorari.” Catholic University Law Review 33: 611–32.
3. Barker Lucius J. 1967. “Third Parties in Litigation: A Systemic View of the Judicial Function.” Journal of Politics 29: 41–65.
4. Baum Lawrence A. 1977. “Policy Goals in Judicial Gate-Keeping: A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 31–36.
5. Bentley Arthur. 1908. The Process of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Bradley Robert, and Gardner Paul. 1985. “Underdogs, Upperdogs, and the Use of the Amicus Brief: Trends and Explanations.” Justice System Journal 10: 78–96.
7. Brenner Saul. 1979. “The New Certiorari Game.” Journal of Politics 41: 649–55.
8. Caldeira Gregory A. 1981. “The United States Supreme Court and Criminal Cases, 1935–1976: Alternative Models of Agenda-Building.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 449–70.
9. Caldeira Gregory A., and Wright John R. 1988. “Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
10. Caplan Lincoln. 1987. The Tenth Justice. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
11. Ennis Bruce J. 1984. “Effective Amicus Briefs.” Catholic University Law Review 33: 603–9.
12. Estreicher Samuel, and Sexton John. 1986. Redefining the Supreme Court's Role: A Theory of Managing the Federal Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
13. Feeney Floyd. 1975. “Conflicts Involving Federal Law: A Review of Cases Presented to the Supreme Court.” in Structure and Internal Procedures: Recommendations for Change, ed. by Commission on Revision of the Federal Court Appellate System. Washington: GPO.
14. Galanter Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95–160.
15. Hakman Nathan. 1966. “Lobbying the Supreme Court—An Appraisal of Political Science Folklore.” Fordham Law Review 35: 50–75.
16. Hakman Nathan. 1969. “The Supreme Court's Political Environment: The Processing of Noncommercial Litigation.” in Frontiers of Judicial Research, ed. Grossman Joel and Tanenhaus Joseph. New York: John Wiley.
17. Ivers Gregg, and O'Connor Karen. 1987. “Friends As Foes: The Amicus Curiae Participation and Effectiveness of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in Criminal Cases, 1969–1982.” Law and Policy 9: 161–78.
18. Krislov Samuel. 1963. “The Amius Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy.” Yale Law Journal 72: 694–721.
19. Likens Thomas. 1979. “Agenda-Setting by the High Court: A Dynamic Analysis.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.
20. Linzer Peter. 1979. “The Meaning of Certiorari Denials.” Columbia Law Review 79: 1227–1305.
21. Maddala G.S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Manwaring David. 1962. Render unto Caesar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Murphy Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. New York University Supreme Court Project. 1984a. Summaries of cases granted certiorari during the 1982 term. New York University Law Review 59: 823–1003.
25. New York University Supreme Court Project. 1984b. “Appendices.” New York University Law Review 59: 1403–1929.
26. O'Brien David. 1986. Storm Center. New York: W.W. Norton.
27. O'Connor Karen, and Epstein Lee. 1982. “Amicus Curiae Participation in the U.S. Supreme Court: An Appraisal of Hakman's Folklore.” Law and Society Review 16: 311–20.
28. O'Connor Karen, and Epstein Lee. 1983a. “Court Rules and Workload: A Case Study of Rules Governing Amicus Curiae Participation.” Justice System Journal 8: 35–45.
29. O'Connor Karen, and Epstein Lee. 1983b. “The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation.” Journal of Politics 45: 479–89.
30. Olson Susan. 1981. “The Political Evolution of Interest Group Litigation.” in Governing through Courts, ed. Gambitta J. Beverly Hills: Sage.
31. Palmer Jan. 1982. “An Econometric Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.” Public Choice 39: 387–98.
32. Peltason Jack W. 1955. Federal Courts in the Political Process. New York: Random House.
33. Perry H.W. Jr. 1985. “Agenda-Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.
34. Perry H.W. Jr. 1986. “Deciding to Decide in the U.S. Supreme Court: Bargaining, Accommodation and Roses.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.
35. Provine Doris Marie. 1980. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Puro Stephen. 1971. “The Role of Amicus Curiae in the United States Supreme Court: 1920–1966.” Ph.D. diss., State University of New York, Buffalo.
37. Rohde David W. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choices, and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 652–82.
38. Rohde David W., and Spaeth Harold J. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
39. Schlozman Kay L., and Tierney John T. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
40. Scigliano Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.
41. Segal Jeffrey A. 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 41: 135–44.
42. Shapiro Stephen M. 1984. “Amicus Briefs in the Supreme Court.” Litigation 10.
43. Songer Donald R. 1979. “Concern for Policy Outputs As a Cue for Supreme Court Decisions on Certiorari.” Journal of Politics 41: 1185–94.
44. Sorauf Frank J. 1976. The Wall of Separation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45. Stern Robert H., Gressman Eugene, and Shapiro Stephen M. 1986. Supreme Court Practice. 6th edition. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs.
46. Tanenhaus Joseph, Schick Marvin, Muraskin Matthew, and Rosen Daniel. 1963. “The Supreme Court's Certiorari Jurisdiction: Cue Theory.” in Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert Glendon. New York: Free Press.
47. Teger Stuart H., and Kosinski Douglas. 1980. “The Cue Theory of Supreme Court Certiorari Jurisdiction: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Politics 42: 834–46.
48. Truman David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
49. Ulmer S. Sidney. 1983. “Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents and the Granting of Plenary Review.” Journal of Politics 45: 474–78.
50. Ulmer S. Sidney. 1984. “The Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions: Conflict As a Predictive Variable.” American Political Science Review 78: 901–11.
51. Ulmer S. Sidney, Hintze William, and Kirklosky Lois. 1972. “The Decision To Grant or Deny Certiorari: Further Considerations on Cue Theory.” Law and Society Review 7: 637–50.
52. Ulmer S. Sidney, and Willison David. 1985. “The Solicitor General of the United States As Amicus Curiae in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1969–1983 Terms.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.
53. Vose Clement E. 1959. Caucasians Only. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54. Vose Clement E. 1981. “Interest Groups and Litigation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.
55. Walker Jack L. 1983. “The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America.” American Political Science Review 77: 390–406.