Intermediate frames of reference in haptically perceived parallelity

Proceedings - 1st Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; World Haptics Conference, WHC 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-11

  Kappers, Astrid M L ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REMOTE CONTROL; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; FRAME OF REFERENCE; FRAMES OF REFERENCE; MID-SAGITTAL PLANES; PARALLELITY; REFERENCE FRAME;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 84934294498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2005.83     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Blumenfeld, W. (1913). Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Grösse im Sehraume [Studies on apparent size in visual space]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 65, 241-404.
2. Blumenfeld, W. (1937). The relationship between optical and haptic construction of space. Acta Psychologica, 2, 125-174.
3. Brambring, M. (1976) The structure of haptic space in the blind and sighted. Psychological Research, 38, 283-302.
4. Coren, S. (1993). The left-hander syndrome. New York: Vintage Books.
5. Cuijpers, R. H., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2002). Visual perception of collinearity. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 392-404.
6. Flanders, M., & Soechting, J. F. (1995). Frames of reference for hand orientation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 182-195.
7. Hillebrand, F. (1902). Theorie der scheinbare Grösse bei binocularem Sehen [Theory of apparent size in binocular vision]. Denkschriften der Wiener Akademie, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaft Klasse, 41, 255-307.
8. Kappers, A. M. L. (1999). Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity. Perception, 28, 1001-1012.
9. Kappers, A. M. L. (2002). Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane. Acta Psychologica, 109, 25-40.
10. Kappers, A. M. L., (2003). Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors. Acta Psychologica, 114, 131-145.
11. Kappers, A. M. L., (2004). The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks, Acta Psychologica, 117, 333-340.
12. Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Haptic perception of spatial relations. Perception, 28, -781-795.
13. Koenderink, J. J., Van Doorn, A. J., Kappers, A. M. L., & Lappin, J. S. (2002). Large scale visual frontoparallels under full cue conditions. Perception, 31, 1467-1475.
14. Koenderink, J. J., Van Doorn, A. J., & Lappin, J. S. (2000) Direct measurement of curvature of visual space. Perception, 29, 69-79.
15. Luneburg, R. K. (1947). Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In: J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and Space (pp. 163-182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Soechting, J. F., & Flanders, M. (1992). Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 167-191.
18. Soechting, J. F., & Flanders, M. (1993). Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 1137-1150.
19. Van Mier, H. I., Blommaert, J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2003). Haptic perception of parallelity in children and adults, Society for Neurosciences, Program No. 196.18.
20. Worchel, P. (1951) Space perception and orientation in the blind, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 65(15), 1-28.