Electronic health records and health care quality over time in a federally qualified health center

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 453-458

  Kern, Lisa M ^a   Edwards, Alison M ^a   Pichardo, Michelle ^b   Kaushal, Rainu ^a,c  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b The Institute for Family Health   (United States)

^c NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic health records; Quality of health care; Safety net providers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; NEW YORK; SAFETY NET HOSPITAL; AGED; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; TRENDS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MALE; MEANINGFUL USE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SAFETY-NET PROVIDERS;

EID: 84934275694     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocu049     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hsiao CJ, Hing E. Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012. NCHS Data Brief 2012;(111):1-8.
2. Kern LM, Barron Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, et al. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(4):496-503.
3. Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA, et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):457-464.
4. Abramson EL, Malhotra S, Osorio SN, et al. A long-term follow-up evaluation of electronic health record prescribing safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e52-e58.
5. Hing E, Burt CW. Are there patient disparities when electronic health records are adopted? J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009;20(2):473-488.
6. King J, Furukawa MF, Buntin MB. Geographic variation in ambulatory electronic health record adoption: implications for underserved communities. Health Serv Res. 2013; 48(6 Pt 1):2037-2059.
7. Heisey-Grove D, Hawkins K, Jones E, et al. Supporting health information technology adoption in Federally Qualified Health Centers: ONC Data Brief, No. 8. Washington, DC; February 2013.
8. Frimpong JA, Jackson BE, Stewart LM, et al. Health information technology capacity at federally qualified health centers: a mechanism for improving quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:35.
9. The Institute for Family Health. www.institute2000. org. Accessed November 18, 2014.
10. Kern LM, Dhopeshwarkar R, Barron Y, et al. Measuring the effects of health information technology on quality of care: a novel set of proposed metrics for electronic quality reporting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(7):359-369.
11. Kern LM, Malhotra S, Barron Y, et al. Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(2):77-83.
12. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Final Rule. Fed Regist. 2010;75:44313-44588.
13. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program - Stage 2. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2012;77: 53967-54162.
14. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10): 742-752.
15. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293(10):1223-1238.
16. Ryan AM, Bishop TF, Shih S, et al. Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records. Health Aff. 2013; 32(1):53-62.
17. Soto CM, Kleinman KP, Simon SR. Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):22.
18. Garrido T, Jamieson L, Zhou Y, et al. Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ 2005;330(7491):581.
19. Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, et al. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):456-463.
20. Keyhani S, Hebert PL, Ross JS, et al. Electronic health record components and the quality of care. Med Care. 2008; 46(12):1267-1272.
21. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, et al. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1400-1405.
22. Poon EG, Wright A, Simon SR, et al. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care. 2010; 48(3):203-209.
23. Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:897-903.
24. Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Albert NM, et al. Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. Am Heart J. 2010;159(4):635-642. e1.
25. Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, et al. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(9): 825-833.
26. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363: 501-504.