Cortical microcircuit dynamics mediating binocular rivalry: The role of adaptation in inhibition

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue NOVEMBER, 2011, Pages

  Theodoni, Panagiota ^a   Panagiotaropoulos, Theofanis I ^b   Kapoor, Vishal ^b   Logothetis, Nikos K ^b,c   Deco, Gustavo ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Binocularrivalry; Computationalmodeling; Mean field; Perceptualbistability; Spike frequencyadaptation; Spiking networks

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ION; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; EXCITATORY PYRAMIDAL INTERNEURON; GAMMA DISTRIBUTION FIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITORY INTERNEURON; INTERNEURON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEAN FIRING RATE; MEAN TIME DOMINANCE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NOISE; OSCILLATION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL BISTABILITY; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; RETINA RIVALRY; SIMULATION; SPIKE FREQUENCY ADAPTATION; SPIKING NETWORK; SYNAPTIC GATING; SYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 84933678153     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00145     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abbott, L. F., and Chance, E. S. (2005). Drivers and modulators from push-pull and balanced synaptic inputs. Prog. Brain Res. 149, 147-155.
2. Alais, D., Cass, J., O'Shea, R. P., and Blake, R. (2010). Visual sensitiv-ity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Curr. Biol. 20, 1362-1367.
3. Amit, D. J. (1995). The hebbian par-adigm reintegrated: local reverber-ations as internal representations. Behav. Brain Sci. 18, 617-625.
4. Amit, D. J., and Brunel, N. (1997). Model of global spontaneuous activ-ity and local structured activ-ity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 7, 237-252.
5. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 96, 145-167.
6. Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry. Brain Mind 2, 5-38.
7. Blake, R., and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neu-rosci. 3, 13-21.
8. Brascamp, J. W., van Ee, R., Noest, J. A., Jacobs, R. H. A. H., and van den Berg, A. V. (2006). The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. J. Vis. 6, 1244-1256.
9. Braun, J., and Mattia, M. (2010). Attrac-tors and noise: twin drivers of deci-sions and multistability. Neuroimage 52, 740-751.
10. Brunel, N., Chance, F. S., Fourcaud, N., and Abbott, L. F. (2001). Effects of synaptic noise and filtering on the frequency response of spiking neu-rons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2186-2189.
11. Brunel, N., and Wang, X.-J. (2001). Effects of neuromodulation inacortical network model of object work-ing memory dominated by recurrent inhibition. J. Comput. Neurosci. 11, 63-68.
12. Conde, F., Lund, J. S., Jacobowitz, D. M., Baimbridge, K. G., and Lewis, A. A. (1994). Local circuit neurons immunoreactive for calretinin, cal-bindin D-28k or parvalbumin in monkey prefronatal cortex: distri-bution and morphology. J. Comp. Neurol. 341, 95-116.
13. Curtu, R. (2010). Singular Hopfbifurca-tions and mixed-mode oscillations in a two-cell inhibitory neural net-work. Physica D 239, 504-514.
14. Curtu, R., Shpiro, A., Rubin, N., and Rinzel, J. (2008). Mechanisms for frequency control in neuronal com-petition models. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 7, 609-649.
15. Deco, G., and Rolls, E. T. (2005). Neuro-dynamics ofbiased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons. J. Neurophys-iol. 94, 295-313.
16. Ermentrout, B. (1990). Phase-Plane: The Dynamical Systems Tool. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. Fourcaud, N., and Brunel, N. (2002). Dynamics of the firing probability of noisy integrate-and-fire neurons. Neural. Comput. 14, 2057-2110.
18. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. J. Neu-rophysiol. 94, 4412-4420.
19. Gabbott, P. L. A., and Bacon, S. J. (1996). Local circuit neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex (areas 24a, b, c, 25 and 32) in the monkey: II. Quantitative areal and laminar distributions. J. Comp. Neurol. 364, 609-636.
20. Kalisvaart, J. P., Klaver, I., and Goossens, J. (2011). Motion discrimination under uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Vis. 11, pii: 20.
21. Kim, T. Y., Grabowecky, M., and Suzuki, S. (2006). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 46, 392-406.
22. Klink, P. C., van eE, R., and van Wezel, R. J. A. (2008). General valid-ity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computacional mecha-nisms for visual rivalry. PLoS ONE 3, e3473. doi:10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0003473
23. Lago-Fernandez, L., and Deco, G. (2002). Amodel ofbinocular rivalry based on competition in IT. Neuro-computing 44, 503-507.
24. Laing, C. R., and Chow, C. (2002). A spiking neural model of binocu-lar rivalry. J. Comput. Neurosci. 12, 39-53.
25. Laing, C. R., Frewen, T., and Kevrekidis, I. G. (2010). Reduced models for binocular rivalry. J. Comput. Neu-rosci. 28, 459-476.
26. Lehky, S. R. (1988). An astable multi-vibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 17, 215-228.
27. Leopold, D. A., and Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena> changing views in perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 3, 254-264.
28. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Sta-ble perception of visually ambigu-ous patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 605-609.
29. Levelt, W. (1968). On Binocular Rivalry. The Hague: Mouton.
30. Liu, Y. H., and Wang, X.-J. (2001). Spike-frequency adaptation of a general-ized leaky integrate-and-fire model neuron. J. Comput. Neurosci. 10, 25-45.
31. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1801-1818.
32. Lundqvist, M., Compte, A., and Lansner, A. (2010). Bistable, irregular fir-ing and population oscillations in a modular attractor memorynetwork. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000803. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000803
33. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., and Leopold, D. A. (2003). Per-ception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Curr. Biol. 13, 1076-1085.
34. Mattia, M., and Del Giudice, P. (2002). Population dynamics of interacting spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 66, 051917.
35. Moreno-Bote, R., Rinzel, J., and Rubin, N. (2007). Noise-induced alterna-tions in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. J. Neuro-physiol. 98, 1125-1139.
36. Moreno-Bote, R., Shpiro, A., Rinzel, J., and Rubin, N. (2010). Alterna-tion rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. J. Vis. 10, 1.
37. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., and Heath, H. A.(1963). ReversibilityoftheNecker Cube. I. An examination of the con-cept "satiation of orientation. " Per-cept. Mot. Skills 17, 439-458.
38. Renart, A., Brunel, N., and Wang, X.-J. (2003). "Mean field theory of recur-rent cortical networks: from irreg-ularly spiking neurons to working memory" in Computational Neuro-science: A Comprehensive Approach, ed. J. Feng (Boca Raton, FL: CRC), 431-490.
39. Salinas, E. (2003). Background synaptic activity as a switch between dynami-cal states in a network. Neural. Com-put. 15, 1439-1475.
40. Seely, J., and Chow, C. C. (2011). The role of mutual inhibition in binoc-ular rivalry. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 2136-2150.
41. Shpiro, A., Curtu, R., Rinzel, J., and Rubin, N. (2007). Dynamical char-acteristics common to neuronal competition models. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 462-473.
42. Shpiro, A., Moreno-Bote, R., Rubin, N., and Rinzel, J. (2009). Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistabilty. J. Comput. Neurosci. 27, 37-54.
43. Stoner, G. R., Mitchell, J. F., Fallah, M., and Reynolds, J. H. (2005). Interact-ing competitive selection in atten-tion and binocular rivalry. Prog. Brain Res. 149, 227-234.
44. Theodoni, P., Kovács, G., Greenlee, M. W., and Deco, G. (2011). Neuronal adaptation effects in decision mak-ing. J. Neurosci. 31, 234-246.
45. Uhlenbeck, G. E., and Ornstein, L. S. (1930). On the theory of brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 36, 823-841.
46. van Ee, R. (2009). Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisyneuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in percep-tual bistability. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 2612-2622.
47. Wang, X.-J. (1998). Calciumcodingand adaptive temporal computation in cortical pyramidal neurons. J. Neu-rophysiol. 79, 1549-1566.
48. Wang, X.-J. (2002). Probabilistic deci-sion making by slow reverbera-tion in cortical circuits. Neuron 36, 955-968.
49. Wang, X.-J., Tegér, J., Constantinidis, C., and Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2004). Division of labor among distinct subtypes of inhibitory neurons in a cortical microcircuit of working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 1368-1373.
50. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contribu-tions to the physiology of vision. Part i. on some remarkable and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 3, 241-242.
51. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 14499-14503.
52. Wilson, H. R. (2007). Minimal phys-iological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Vision Res. 47, 2741-2750.
53. Wong, K.-F., and Wang, X.-J. (2006). A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in percep-tual decisions. J. Neurosci. 26, 1314-1328.