I know what is missing here: Electrophysiological prediction error signals elicited by omissions of predicted "what" but not "when"

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUL, 2013, Pages

  SanMiguel, Iria ^a   Saupe, Katja ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Bayesian surprise; Efference copy; Human; Predictive coding; Predictive timing; Self generation; Temporal orienting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL CODE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; SENSORY PREDICTION; SENSORY SYSTEM; SOUND; STIMULUS;

EID: 84933678032     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00407     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Albright, T.D. (2012). On the perception of probable things: neural substrates of associative memory, imagery, and perception. Neuron 74, 227-245.
2. Anllo-Vento, L. (1995). Shifting attention in visual space: the effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. International Journal of Neuroscience 80, 353-370.
3. Arnal, L.H., and Giraud, A.L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn Sci 16, 390-398.
4. Baess, P., Jacobsen, T., and Schröger, E. (2008). Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: Evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 70, 137-143.
5. Baldi, P., and Itti, L. (2010). Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention. Neural Networks 23, 649-666.
6. Barceló, F., Escera, C., Corral, M.J., and Periáñez, J.A. (2006). Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 1734-1748.
7. Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., and Schröger, E. (2012). Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. Int J Psychophysiol 83, 120-131.
8. Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., and Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. Journal of Neuroscience 29, 8447-8451.
9. Bosch-Bayard, J., Valdés-Sosa, P., Virues-Alba, T., Aubert-Vazquez, E., John, E.R., Harmony, T., Riera-Diaz, J., and Trujillo-Barreto, N. (2001). 3D statistical parametric mapping of EEG source spectra by means of variable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA). Clin Electroencephalogr 32, 47-61.
10. Chatrian, G.E., Lettich, E., and Nelson, P.L. (1985). Ten percent electrode system for topographic studies of spontaneous and evoked EEG activities. American Journal of EEG Technology 25, 83-92.
11. Correa, A., Lupianez, J., and Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12, 328-334.
12. Crapse, T.B., and Sommer, M.A. (2008). Corollary discharge circuits in the primate brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6, 552-557.
13. Delorme, A., and Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single1-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods 134, 9-21.
14. Den Ouden, H.E., Friston, K.J., Daw, N.D., Mcintosh, A.R., and Stephan, K.E. (2009). A dual role for prediction error in associative learning. Cereb Cortex 19, 1175-1185.
15. Doherty, J.R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M.M., and Nobre, A.C. (2005). Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 8259-8266.
16. Donchin, E. (1981). Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!. Surprise? Psychophysiology 18, 493-513.
17. Escera, C., and Corral, M.J. (2007). Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. Journal of Psychophysiology 21, 251-264.
18. Evans, A.C., Collins, D.L., Mills, S.R., Brown, E.D., Kelly, R.L., and Peters, T.M. (1993). 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 1993 IEEE Conference Record 3, 1813-1817.
19. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., and Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol Psychol 51, 87-107.
20. Feldman, H., and Friston, K.J. (2010). Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Front Hum Neurosci 4, 215.
21. Folstein, J.R., and Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45, 152-170.
22. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y.M., and Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 25, 355-373.
23. Gehring, W.J., Goss, B., Coles, M.G., Meyer, D.E., and Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science 4, 385-390.
24. Gentsch, A., Ullsperger, P., and Ullsperger, M. (2009). Dissociable medial frontal negativities from a common monitoring system for self-and externally caused failure of goal achievement. Neuroimage 47, 2023-2030.
25. Griffin, I.C., Miniussi, C., and Nobre, A.C. (2002). Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia 40, 2325-2340.
26. Hawkins, H.L., Hillyard, S.A., Luck, S.J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C.J., and Woodward, D.P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 802-811.
27. Hesse, M.D., Nishitani, N., Fink, G.R., Jousmaki, V., and Hari, R. (2010). Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. Cereb Cortex 20, 425-432.
28. Hughes, H.C., Darcey, T.M., Barkan, H.I., Williamson, P.D., Roberts, D.W., and Aslin, C.H. (2001). Responses of human auditory association cortex to the omission of an expected acoustic event. Neuroimage 13, 1073-1089.
29. Itti, L., and Baldi, P. (2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research 49, 1295-1306.
30. Iwanaga, M., and Nittono, H. (2010). Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay. Psychophysiology 47, 281-288.
31. Jones, E.G. (1998). Viewpoint: the core and matrix of thalamic organization. Neuroscience 85, 331-345.
32. Kastner, S., Pinsk, M.A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., and Ungerleider, L.G. (1999). Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation. Neuron 22, 751-761.
33. Katahira, K., Abla, D., Masuda, S., and Okanoya, K. (2008). Feedback-based erro1 r monitoring processes during musical performance: an ERP study. Neurosci Res 61, 120-128.
34. Kok, P., Rahnev, D., Jehee, J.F., Lau, H.C., and De Lange, F.P. (2012). Attention reverses the effect of prediction in silencing sensory signals. Cerebral Cortex 22, 2197-2206.
35. Kolossa, A., Fingscheidt, T., Wessel, K., and Kopp, B. (2012). A model-based approach to trial-by-trial p300 amplitude fluctuations. Front Hum Neurosci 6, 359.
36. Kuhn, S., Seurinck, R., Fias, W., and Waszak, F. (2010). The Internal Anticipation of Sensory Action Effects: When Action Induces FFA and PPA Activity. Front Hum Neurosci 4, 54.
37. Lange, K. (2009). Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain and Cognition 69, 127-137.
38. Langner, R., Kellermann, T., Boers, F., Sturm, W., Willmes, K., and Eickhoff, S.B. (2011). Modality-specific perceptual expectations selectively modulate baseline activity in auditory, somatosensory, and visual cortices. Cerebral Cortex 21, 2850-2862.
39. Large, E.W., and Jones, M.R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time17 varying events. Psychological Review 106, 119-159.
40. Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M.G., Clark, V.P., and Hawkins, H.L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 887-904.
41. Maguire, R., Maguire, P., and Keane, M.T. (2011). Making sense of surprise: an investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37, 176-186.
42. Mangun, G.R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 32, 4-18.
43. Maris, E., and Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG-and MEG28 data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 164, 177-190.
44. Mars, R.B., Debener, S., Gladwin, T.E., Harrison, L.M., Haggard, P., Rothwell, J.C., and Bestmann, S. (2008). Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise. Journal of Neuroscience 28, 12539-12545.
45. Miniussi, C., Wilding, E.L., Coull, J.T., and Nobre, A.C. (1999). Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. Brain 122 (Pt 8), 1507-1518.
46. Nobre, A., Correa, A., and Coull, J. (2007). The hazards of time. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17, 465-470.
47. Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., and Schoffelen, J.M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 156869.
48. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., and Echallier, J.F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72, 184-187.
49. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 118, 2128-2148.
50. Raij, T., Mcevoy, L., Mäkelä, J.P., and Hari, R. (1997). Human auditory cortex is activated by omissions of auditory stimuli. Brain research 745, 134-143.
51. SanMiguel, I., Widmann, A., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N., and Schröger, E. (2013). Hearing silences: human auditory processing relies on preactivation of sound-specific brain activity patterns. Journal of Neuroscience 33, 8633-8639.
52. Schlögl, A., Keinrath, C., Zimmermann, D., Scherer, R., Leeb, R., and Pfurtscheller, G1. (2007). A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 118, 98-104.
53. Schroeder, C.E., and Lakatos, P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences 32, 9-18.
54. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., and John, E.R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150, 1187-1188.
55. Teigen, K.H., and Keren, G. (2003). Surprises: low probabilities or high contrasts? Cognition 87, 55-71.
56. Timm, J., SanMiguel, I., Saupe, K., and Schröger, E. (2013). The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention. BMC Neuroscience 14, 2.
57. Trujillo-Barreto, N.J., Aubert-Vazquez, E., and Valdes-Sosa, P.A. (2004). Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging. Neuroimage 21, 1300-1319.
58. Urbach, T.P., and Kutas, M. (2006). Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling. Biological Psychology 72, 333-343.
59. Wolpert, D.M., and Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3 Suppl, 1212-1217.
60. Worsley, K.J., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., and Evans, A.C. (1996). Searching scale space for activation in PET images. Hum Brain Mapp 4, 74-90.