Task modulation of brain responses in visual word recognition as studied using EEG/MEG and fMRI

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUN, 2013, Pages

  Chen, Y ^a   Davis, M H ^b   Pulvermuller F ^b,c   Hauk, O ^b  

^a Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lexical decision; Reading; Semantic decision; Source estimation; Top down control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEFT PRECENTRAL GYRUS; LEXICAL DECISION MAKING; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MENTAL TASK; PERCEPTION; RELIABILITY; SEMANTIC DECISION MAKING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SILENT READING MAKING; STATISTICS; TEMPORAL GYRUS; VISION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84933675573     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00376     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Amsel, B. D. (2011). Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potential s. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 970-983.
2. Amsel, B. D., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2013). Alive and grasping: Stable and rapid semantic access to an object category but not object graspability. Neuroimage, 77, 1-13.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85(4), 249-277.
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshal l, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Exper imental Psychology-Gener a l, 133(2), 283-316.
6. Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. (2006). Attentional control and flexible lexical proces sing: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issue sinlexical processing (pp. 229-258). New York: Psychology Press.
7. Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analys is of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Cerebral Cor tex, 19(12), 2767-2796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055
8. Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Pos sing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J Cogn Neurosci, 17(6), 905-917.
9. Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci, 25, 151-188.
10. Chee, M. W. L., Hon, N. H. H., Caplan, D., Lee, H. L., & Goh, J. (2002). Frequency of concrete words modula tes prefrontal activation during semant ic judgments. [Article]. Neuroimage, 16(1), 259-268.
11. Chumbley, J. I., & Balota, D. A. (1984). A word' s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Mem Cogni t, 12(6), 590-606.
12. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaf f, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area-Spatial and temporal characterization of an initials tage of reading in normal subjects and posterior spl it-brain patients. [Article]. Brain, 123, 291-307.
13. Cohen, L., Henry, C., Dehaene, S., Martinaud, O., Lehericy, S., Lemer, C., & Ferrieux, S. (2004). The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia, 42(13), 1768-1780.
14. Cohen, L., Lehericy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Languagespecific tuning of visual cortex functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain, 125, 1054-1069
15. Dale, Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999). Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction. NeuroImage, 9(2), 179-194.
16. Dale, & Sereno, M. I. (1993). Improved localizadon of cortical activity by combining eeg and meg with mricortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. J. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 162-176. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162
17. Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2003). Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J Neurosci, 23(8), 3423-3431.
18. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn Sci, 15(6), 254-262.
19. Devlin, J. T., Matthews, P. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2003). Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 71-84. doi: doi:10.1162/089892903321107837
20. Devl in, J. T., Russell, R. P., Davis, M. H., Price, C. J., Wilson, J., Moss, H. E.,. Tyler, L. K. (2000). Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task. NeuroImage, 11(6), 589-600.
21. Evans, G. A., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Woollams, A. M. (2012). What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic inf luences on visual word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev.
22. Fiebach, C. J., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Processing concrete words: fMRI evidence against a specific right-hemisphere involvement. Neurops y chologia, 42(1), 62-70.
23. Fiebach, C. J., Ricker, B., Friederici, A. D., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Inhibition and facilitation i n visual word recognition: Prefrontal contribution to the orthographic neighborhood s ize effect. Neuroimage, 36(3), 901-911.
24. Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., & Dale, A. M. (1999). Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System. NeuroImage, 9(2), 195-207.
25. Friston, K. J., & Henson, R. N. (2006). Commentary on: Divide and conquer; a defence of functional localisers. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1097-1099.
26. Fuchs, M., Wagner, M., Kohler, T., & Wischmann, H.-A. (1999). Linear and Nonl inear Current Density Reconstructions. Journal of Cl inical Neurophys iology, 16(3), 267-295.
27. Goldenholz, D. M., Ahlfors, S. P., Hämäläinen, M. S., Sharon, D., Ishitobi, M., Vaina, L. M., & Stufflebeam, S. M. (2009). Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp, 30(4), 1077-1086.
28. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128-156.
29. Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994). Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm est imates. Med Bio l Eng Comput, 32(1), 35-42.
30. Hauk, O. (2004). Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norme stimation in the analysi s of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage, 21(4), 1612-1621.
31. Hauk, O., Coutout, C., Holden, A., & Chen, Y. (2012). The time-course of single-word reading: Evidence from fast behaviora l and brain responses. Neuroimage, 60(2), 1462-1477.
32. Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermuller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383-1400.
33. Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Kherif, F., & Pulvermuller, F. (2008). Imagery or meaning? Evidence for a semantic origin of category-specific brain activity in metabolic imaging. [Review]. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27(7), 1856-1866.
34. Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., & Pulvermuller, F. (2008). Modulation of brain activity by multiple lexical and word form variables in visual word recognition: A parametric fMRI study. [Article]. Neuroimage, 42(3), 1185-1195.
35. Hauk, O., Patterson, K., Woollams, A., Watling, L., Pulvermuller, F., & Rogers, T. T. (2006). [Q:] When Would You Prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP Correlates of Orthographic Typicality and Lexical ity in Written Word Recognition. Journal of Cogni tiv e Neuroscience, 18(5), 818-832. doi: doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.818
36. Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004a). Effects of word length and frequency on the human eventrelated potential. Cl in Neurophysiol, 115(5), 1090-1103.
37. Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004b). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the frontocentral cortex. [Article]. Human Brain Mapping, 21(3), 191-201.
38. Hauk, O., Wakeman, D. G., & Henson, R. (2011). Compari son of noi se-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics. Neuroimage, 54(3), 1966-1974.
39. Heil, M., Rolke, B., & Pecchinenda, A. (2004). Automatic semant ic activation is no myth: semantic context effects on the N400 in the le tter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychol Sci, 15(12), 852-857.
40. Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Munte, T. F.,. et al. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activ ity during visual selective at tention in humans. Nature, 372(6506), 543-546.
41. Holmes, A. P., & Friston, K. J. (1998). Generali sability, random effects and population inference. Neuroimage, 7, S754.
42. James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Per formance, 1(2), 130-136.
43. Jessen, F., Heun, R., Erb, M., Granath, D. O., Klose, U., Papassotiropoulos, A., & Grodd, W. (2000). The concreteness effect: evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain Lang, 74(1), 103-112.
44. Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 20(2), 693-712.
45. Joubert, S., Beauregard, M., Walter, N., Bourgouin, P., Beaudoin, G., Leroux, J. M.,. Lecours, A. R. (2004). Neural correla tes of lexical and sublexical processes in reading. Brain and Language, 89(1), 9-20.
46. Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2004). Stati st ical parametric mapping for event-related potentials: I. Generic considerations. NeuroImage, 22(2), 492-502.
47. Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (2010). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modul ate subsequent masked semantic priming. J Exp Psychol Gen, 139(3), 464-489.
48. Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain act ivation. Neuror epor t, 11(11), 2401-2407.
49. Kronbichler, M., Bergmann, J., Hutzler, F., Staffen, W., Mai r, A., Ladurner, G., & Wimmer, H. (2007). Taxi vs. Taksi: On orthographic word recognition in the left ventral occipitotempora lcortex. [Article]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(10), 1584-1594.
50. Kronbichler, M., Klackl, J., Richlan, F., Schurz, M., Staffen, W., Ladurner, G., & Wimmer, H. (2009). On the functional neuroanatomy of visual word processing: effects of case and letter deviance. J Cogn Neurosci, 21(2), 222-229.
51. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potent ial (ERP). Annu Rev P sychol, 62, 621-647.
52. Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci, 9(12), 920-933.
53. Liljestrom, M., Hulten, A., Parkkonen, L., & Salmelin, R. (2009). Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects. Hum Brain Mapp, 30(6), 1845-1856.
54. McDonald, C. R., Thesen, T., Carlson, C., Blumberg, M., Girard, H. M., Trongnetrpunya, A.,. Halgren, E. (2010). Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing. NeuroImage, 53(2), 707-717.
55. Mol ins, A., Stufflebeam, S. M., Brown, E. N., & Hämäläinen, M. S. (2008). Quantification of the benef it from integrating MEG and EEG dat a in minimum l2-norm est imation. Neuroimage, 42(3), 1069-1077.
56. Neely, J. H., & Kahan, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger (Ed.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of R. G. Crowder (pp. 69-93). Washington, DC:: American Psychological Association.
57. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologi a, 9(1), 97-113.
58. Opitz, B., Mecklinger, A., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Kruggel, F. (1999). Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. Psychophysiology, 36(1), 142-147.
59. Pammer, K., Hansen, P. C., Kringelbach, M. L., Holliday, I., Barnes, G., Hillebrand, A.,. Cornelissen, P. L. (2004). Visual word recognition: the first half second. Neuro image, 22(4), 1819-1825.
60. Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci, 8(12), 976-987.
61. Pluim, J. P., Maintz, J. B., & Viergever, M. A. (2003). Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 22(8), 986-1004.
62. Price, C. J. (2000). The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy, 197 P t 3, 335-359.
63. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Science s, 15(6), 246-253.
64. Pulvermuller, F., Cooper-Pye, E., Dine, C., Hauk, O., Nestor, P.J., & Patterson, K. (2010). The word processing defic it in semantic dementia: All categor ies are equal, but some categories are more equal than others. J. Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 2027-2041. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21339
65. Pulvermuller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: neurophys iological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and language, 110(2), 81-94.
66. Pylkkanen, L., & Marantz, A. (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. [Review]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 187-189.
67. Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage, 27(1), 188-200.
68. Scott, S. K., Blank, C. C., Rosen, S., & Wise, R. J. (2000). Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporallobe. Brain, 123 Pt 12, 2400-2406.
69. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 489-493.
70. Sharon, D., Hämäläinen, M. S., Tootell, R. B., Halgren, E., & Belliveau, J. W. (2007). The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focallys timulatedv isual cortex. Neuroimage, 36(4), 1225-1235.
71. Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of Inter ference in Ser ial Verbal Reactions (Repr inted from Journal Experimental-Psychology, Vol 18, Pg 643-662, 1935). Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 121(1), 15-23.
72. Taulu, S., & Kajola, M. (2005). Presentation of electromagnetic multichannel data: The signal space separation method. Journal of Applied Physics, 97(12).
73. Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring "how" from "where". Neurops ychologia, 41(3), 280-292.
74. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N.,. Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical l abeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1), 273-289.
75. van Casteren, M., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 584-589.
76. van Casteren, M., & Davis, M. H. (2007). Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 973-978.
77. Van Doren, L., Schrooten, M., Adamczuk, K., Dupont, P., & Vandenberghe, R. (2012). Chronometry of word and picture identification: common and modal ity-specific effects. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Neuro image, 59(4), 3701-3712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.068
78. Vartiainen, J., Liljestrom, M., Koskinen, M., Renvall, H., & Salmelin, R. (2011). Functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and magnetoencephalography evoked responses yield different neural functionality in reading. J Neuros ci, 31(3), 1048-1058.
79. Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron, 55(1), 143-156.
80. Visser, M., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: a meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature. J Cogn Neurosci, 22(6), 1083-1094.
81. Wheat, Cornelissen, P. L., Frost, S. J., & Hansen, P. C. (2010). During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech production code: evidence from magnetoencephalography. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(15), 5229-5233.
82. Whi tney, C., Kirk, M., O'Sul livan, J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Jeffer ie s, E. (2011). The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Cereb Cortex, 21(5), 1066-1075.
83. Wise, R. J., Howard, D., Mummery, C. J., Fletcher, P., Leff, A., Buchel, C., & Scott, S. K. (2000). Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 38(7), 985-994.
84. Woollams, A. M. (2005). Imageability and ambiguity effects in speeded naming: convergence and divergence. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 31(5), 878-890.
85. Woollams, A. M., Silani, G., Okada, K., Patterson, K., & Price, C. J. (2011). Word or word-like? Dissociating orthographictypicality from lexicality in the left occipito-temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 992-1002.