Lognormal distributions of user post lengths in internet discussions - a consequence of the weber-fechner law?

EPJ Data Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-20

  Sobkowicz, Pawel ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^b   Buckley, Kevan ^b   Paltoglou, Georgios ^b   Sobkowicz, Antoni ^c  

^a KEN   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; LARGE DATASET;

EXPERIMENTAL CHECK; JUST-NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCE; LENGTH DISTRIBUTIONS; LOG-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS; RECOGNITION CAPACITY; UNIVERSAL MECHANISMS; WEBER-FECHNER LAWS;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 84933504945     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21931127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjds14     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46:323-351
2. Aitchison J, Brown J (1963) The lognormal distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Limpert E, Stahel W, Abbt M (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 51(5):341-352
4. Mitzenmacher M (2004) A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math 1(2):226-251
5. Mitzenmacher M (2004) Dynamic models for file sizes and double Pareto distributions. Internet Math 1(3):305-333
6. Reed W, Jorgensen M (2004) The double Pareto-lognormal distribution - a new parametric model for size distributions. Commun Stat, Theory Methods 33(8):1733-1754
7. Zipf GK (1935) The psycho-biology of language: an introduction to dynamic philology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
8. Yule G (1939) On sentence-length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose: with application to two cases of disputed authorship. Biometrika 30(3-4):363
9. Williams CB (1940) A note on the statistical analysis of sentence-length as a criterion of literary style. Biometrika 31(3-4):356
10. Wake W (1957) Sentence-length distributions of Greek authors. J R Stat Soc A, General 120(3):331-346
11. Sichel H (1974) On a distribution representing sentence-length in written prose. J R Stat Soc A, General 137:25-34
12. Montemurro M, Zanette D (2002) New perspectives on Zipf’s law in linguistics: from single texts to large corpora. Glottometrics 4:87-99
13. Zanette D, Montemurro M (2005) Dynamics of text generation with realistic Zipf’s distribution. J Quant Linguist 12:29-40
14. Sigurd B, Eeg-Olofsson M, Van Weijer J (2004) Word length, sentence length and frequency - Zipf revisited. Stud Linguist 58:37-52
15. Sobkowicz P, Sobkowicz A (2010) Dynamics of hate based Internet user networks. Eur Phys J B 73(4):633-643
16. Paxson V (1994) Empirically derived analytic models of wide-area TCP connections. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 2(4):316-336
17. Staehle D, Leibnitz K, Tran-Gia P (2000) Source traffic modeling of wireless applications. Technical report No. 261, Universität Würzburg, Institut für Informatik
18. Bolotin V, Levy Y, Liu D (1999) Characterizing data connection and messages by mixtures of distributions on logarithmic scale. In: ITC-16: international teletraffic congress, pp 887-894
19. Karagiannis T, Vojnovic M (2008) Email information flow in large-scale enterprises. Technical report, Microsoft research. ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/TR/TR-2008-76.pdf
20. Karagiannis T, Vojnovic M (2009) Behavioral profiles for advanced email features. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 711-720
21. Douceur J, Bolosky W (1999) A large-scale study of file-system contents. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 27:59-70
22. Downey A (2001) The structural cause of file size distributions. In: Proceedings of ninth international symposium on modeling, analysis and simulation of computer and telecommunication systems, pp 361-370
23. Arlitt M, Williamson C (1996) Web server workload characterization: the search for invariants. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 24:126-137
24. Tanenbaum A, Herder J, Bos H (2006) File size distribution on UNIX systems: then and now. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 40:100-104
25. Gros C, Kaczor G, Markovic D (2012) Neuropsychological constraints to human data production on a global scale. Eur Phys J B 85:28
26. Voss J (2005) Measuring Wikipedia. In: International conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, pp 221-231
27. Blumenstock J (2008) Automatically assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles. Technical report, School of Information, UC Berkeley. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/18s3z11b
28. Blumenstock J (2008) Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 1095-1096
29. Serrano M, Flammini A, Menczer F (2009) Modeling statistical properties of written text. PLoS ONE 4(4):e5372
30. Masucci AP, Kalampokis A, Eguiluz VM, Hernández-Garcia E (2011) Wikipedia information flow analysis reveals the scale-free architecture of the semantic space. PLoS ONE 6(2):e17333
31. Adler B, de Alfaro L, Pye I, Raman V (2008) Measuring author contributions to the Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Wikis, pp 1-10
32. Mishne G, Glance N (2006) Leave a reply: an analysis of weblog comments. In: Third annual workshop on the weblogging ecosystem
33. Schuth A, Marx M, de Rijke M (2007) Extracting the discussion structure in comments on news-articles. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM international workshop on web information and data management. ACM, New York, pp 97-104
34. He Y, Caroli F, Mandl T (2007) The Chinese and the German blogosphere: an empirical and comparative analysis. In: Mensch & Computer 2007: Konferenz für interaktive und kooperative Medien, München, pp 149-158
35. Morzy M (2009) On mining and social role discovery in Internet forums. In: International workshop on social informatics, SOCINFO ’09. IEEE Press, New York, pp 74-79
36. Santini M (2001) Text typology and statistics. Explorations in Italian press subgenres. Ital J Linguist 13:339-374
37. Leopold E, Kindermann J (2002) Text categorization with support vector machines. How to represent texts in input space? Mach Learn 46:423-444
38. Willkomm D, Machiraju S, Bolot J, Wolisz A (2008) Primary users in cellular networks: a large-scale measurement study. In: New frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, 2008. DySPAN 2008. 3rd IEEE symposium on, pp 1-11
39. Vaz de Melo P, Akoglu L, Faloutsos C, Loureiro A (2010) Surprising patterns for the call duration distribution of mobile phone users. In: Balcázar J, Bonchi F, Gionis A, Sebag M (eds) Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6323. Springer, Berlin, pp 354-369
40. Chmiel A, Sobkowicz P, Sienkiewicz J, Paltoglou G, Buckley K, Thelwall M, Holyst J (2011) Negative emotions boost users activity at BBC forum. Physica A 390(16):2936-2944
41. Sobkowicz P, Sobkowicz A (2012) Properties of social network in an Internet political discussion forum. Adv Complex Syst. doi:10.1142/S0219525912500622
42. Thelwall M, Sud P, Vis F (2012) Commenting on YouTube videos: from Guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63(3):616-629
43. Söderlund J, Kiss L, Niklasson G, Granqvist C (1998) Lognormal size distributions in particle growth processes without coagulation. Phys Rev Lett 80(11):2386-2388
44. Espiau de Lamaëstre R, Bernas H (2006) Significance of lognormal nanocrystal size distributions. Phys Rev B 73(12):125-317
45. Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités économiques
46. Stanley M, Buldyrev S, Havlin S, Mantegna R, Salinger M, Stanley HE (1995) Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms. Econ Lett 49(4):453-457
47. Sutton J (1997) Gibrat’s legacy. J Econ Lit 35:40-59
48. Weber EH (1846) Der Tastsinn und das Gemeingefühl. In: Wagner R (ed) Handwörtebuch der Physiologie. Vieweg, Braunschweig, pp 481-588
49. Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik, vol 3. Breitkopf & Härtel, Wiesbaden
50. Murata T (1988) A basic study on safe car-following distance - report of the national research institute of police science. Research on traffic safety and regulation. Publication of National Police Agency, Japan 29:17-23
51. Dehaene S (2003) The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line. Trends Cogn Sci 7(4):145-147
52. Siegler R, Opfer J (2003) The development of numerical estimation. Psychol Sci 14(3):237
53. Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke E, Pica P (2008) Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320(5880):1217-1220
54. Cantlon J, Cordes S, Libertus M, Brannon E (2009) Comment on “Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures”. Science 323(5910):38
55. Dehaene S, Izard V, Pica P, Spelke E (2009) Response to comment on “Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures”. Science 323(5910):38
56. Izard V, Dehaene S (2008) Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition 106(3):1221-1247
57. Merten K, Nieder A (2009) Compressed scaling of abstract numerosity representations in adult humans and monkeys. J Cogn Neurosci 21(2):333-346
58. Stevens S (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev 64(3):153
59. Stevens S (1975) Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. Transaction Publishers, Picataway
60. Lewis P, Miall R, Lewis P, Miall R (2009) The precision of temporal judgment: milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 364(1525):1897-1905
61. Cowdrick M (1917) The Weber-Fechner law and Sanford’s weight experiment. Am J Psychol 28(4):585-588