On the Proper Treatment of Proper Names

Nordic Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 91-110

  Thomsen, Hanne Erdman ^a  

^a Department of Computational Linguistics ness School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933482249     PISSN: 03325865     EISSN: 15024717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0332586500004029     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Allan, K. 1995. What Names Tell About the Lexicon and the Encyclopedia. Lexicology 2, 280–325.
2. Allwood, J., Andersson, L.-G. & Dahl, O. 1977. Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Alshawi, H., Carter, D., Crouch, R., Pulman, S., Rayner, M. & Smith, A. 1992. CLARE: A Contextual Reasoning and Cooperative Response Framework for the Core Language Engine. Cambridge: SRI International, Cambridge Computer Science Research Centre.
4. Barwise, J. & Cooper, R. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
5. Barwise, J. & Perry, J. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Burge, T. 1973. Reference and Proper Names. Journal of Philosophy 70 (14). Cann, R. 1993. Formal Semantics - an Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carroll, J. M. 1985. What's in a Name? New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
8. Chesterman, A. 1991. On Definiteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Coates-Stephens, S. 1993. The Analysis and Acquisition of Proper Names for the Under-standing of Free Text. Computers and the Humanities 26: 441–456.
11. Conrad, B. 1985. Two Essays on Reference without Meaning. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 19(1).
12. Cooper, R, 1991, Three Lectures on Situation Theoretic Grammar. In Seligman, I. (ed.), Partial and Dynamic Semantics III. Edinburgh: DYANA Deliverable R2.1.C, Centre for Cognitive Science, pp. 1–38.
13. Cooper, R., Crouch, R., van Eijck, J., Fox, C., van Genabith, J., Jaspers, J., Kamp, H., Pinkal, M., Poesio, M., Pulman, S. & Vestre, E. 1994. FraCaS Deliverable D9. In The State of the Art in Computational Semantics: Evaluating the Descriptive Capabilities of Semantic Theories. Available by anonymous ftp from ftp.cogsci.ed.ac.uk, pub/ FRACASide9.ps.gz. ps. gz.
14. Devlin, K, 1991. Logic and Information. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
15. Dowty, D. R., Wall, R. E. & Peters, S. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Synthese Language Library, vol. 11. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
16. Gamut, L. T. F. 1991. Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar. Logic, Language and Meaning, vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Huddleston, R. 1988. English Grammar Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Jackson, H. 1988. Words and Their Meaning. London: Longman.
19. Kamp, H. & Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G. (eds,), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 253-355,
21. Lehrer, A. 1992. Names and Naming: Why We Need Fields and Frames. In Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E. F. (eds.), Fields and Contrasts - New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdal, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123–142.
22. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lonning, J. T. 1987. Mass Terms and Quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 1–52.
24. Muskens, R. 1996. Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 143–186.
25. Palmer, F. R. 1981. Semantics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Partee, B. H., ter Meulen, A. & Wall, R. E. 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Quine, W. V. O. 1952. Methods of Logic. London: Routledge.
28. Quine, W.V.O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Quine, W.V.O. 1964 [1948]. On What There Is. In Quine, W., From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Russel, B. 1956 [1918], The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. In Marsh, R, C. (ed.), Logic and Knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin.
31. Saussure, F. 1960 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. London: Owen.
32. Schwarz, D. S. 1979. Naming and Referring. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
33. Searle, J. R. 1958. Proper Names. Mind 67, 166–173.
34. Sloat, C. 1969. Proper Nouns in English. Language 45.
35. Sorensen H. S. 1963. The Meaning of Proper Names. Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.
36. Stechow von, A. & Wunderlich, D 1991. Semantik/Semantic - ein Internationales Hand-buch der Zeitgenossischen Forschung -An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Handbficher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft: HSK, vol. 6. Berlin: de Gruyter.
37. Strawson, P. F. 1950. On Referring. Mind 49, 320–433.
38. Vennemann, T. 1973. Topics, Sentence Accent, Ellipsis: a proposal for their formal treatment. In Keenan, E. (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–328.
39. Westerstahl, D. 1985. Determiners and Context Sets. In van Benthem, J. & ter Meulen, A. (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. Holland: Foris Publications.