Powerful/powerless language use in group interactions: Sex differences or similarities?

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 282-303

  Grob, Lindsey M ^a   Meyers, Renee A ^b   Schuh, Renee ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c American Family Insurance   (United States)

Author keywords

Disclaimers; Group interaction; Hedges; Interruptions; Powerful powerless language; Sex differences; Tag questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933481234     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463379709370066     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Adkins, M., and Brashers, D. E., 1995. The power of language in computer-mediated groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 8: 289–322.
2. Argyle, M., Lalljee, M., and Cook, M., 1968. The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations, 21: 3–17.
3. Aries, E., 1976. Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior, 7: 7–18.
4. Aries, E., 1982. Verbal and nonverbal behavior in single-sex and mixed-sex groups: Are traditional sex roles changing?. Psychological Reports, 51: 127–134.
5. Aries, E., 1987. “ Gender and communication ”. In Sex and gender, Edited by: Shaver, P., and Hendrick, C., 149–176. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Auld, F., Jr. and White, A. M., 1956. Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. Journal of Psychology, 42: 273–281.
7. Bate, B., 1988. Communication between the sexes, New York: Harper & Row.
8. Baird, J. E., 1976. Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62: 179–192.
9. Baker, M. A., 1991. Gender and verbal communication in professional settings: A review of research. Management Communication Quarterly, 5: 36–63.
10. Beattie, G. W., 1981. Interruption in conversational interaction, and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics, 19: 15–35.
11. Beck, A. T., 1988. Love is never enough, New York: Harper & Row.
12. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., and Zelditch, M., 1973. “ Status characteristics and social interaction ”. In Interpersonal behavior in small groups, Edited by: Ofshe, R., 194–216. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Berger, J., Conner, T. L., and Fisek, M. H., 1974. Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program, Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
14. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., and Wagner, D. G., 1985. “ The formation of reward expectation in status situations ”. In Status, rewards, and influence, Edited by: Berger, J., and Zelditch, M., 215–261. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., and Zelditch, M., 1980. Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6: 479–508.
16. Bilous, F. R., and Krauss, R. M., 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviors of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8: 183–194.
17. Bohn, E., and Stutman, R., 1983. Sex-role differences in the relational control dimension of dyadic interaction. Women's Studies in Communication, 6: 96–104.
18. Bradac, J. J., 1982. “ A rose by another name: Attitudinal consequences of lexical variations ”. In Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts, Edited by: Ryan, E. B., and Giles, H., 99–115. London: Edward Arnold.
19. Bradac, J. J., Hemphill, M. R., and Tardy, C. H., 1981. Language style on trial: Effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech upon judgments of victims and villians. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45: 327–341.
20. Bradac, J. J., and Mulac, A., 1984a. A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentions. Communication Monographs, 51: 307–319.
21. Bradac, J. J., and Mulac, A., 1984b. Attributional consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles in a crisis-intervention context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3: 1–19.
22. Bradley, P. H., 1980. Sex, competence, and opinion deviation: An expectation states approach. Communication Monographs, 47: 101–110.
23. Bradley, P. H., 1981. The folk-linguistics of women's’ speech: An empirical investigation. Communication Monographs, 48: 73–90.
24. Brashers, D. E., and Meyers, R. A., 1989. Tag-team argument and group decision-making: A preliminary investigation. Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation. 1989, Annandale, VA. Edited by: Gronbeck, B. E., pp. 542–550. SCA.
25. Burrell, N. A., and Koper, R. J., 1994. “ The efficacy of powerful/powerless language on persuasiveness/credibility: A meta-analytic review ”. In Prospects and precautions in the use of meta-analysis, Edited by: Preiss, R.W., and Allen, M., 235–255. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
26. Canary, D. J., Brossmann, B. G., and Seibold, D. R., 1987. Argument structures in decision-making groups. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 53: 18–37.
27. Canary, D. J., and Hause, K. S., 1993. Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication?. Communication Quarterly, 41: 129–144.
28. Carli, L. L., 1990. Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 565–576.
29. Coates, J., 1986. Women, men, and language: Studies in language and linguistics, London: Longman.
30. Coates, J., and Cameron, D., 1989. Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex, London: Longman.
31. Crosby, F., and Nyquist, L., 1977. The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypothesis. Language in Society, 6: 313–322.
32. Dindia, K., 1987. The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13: 345–371.
33. Dindia, K., and Allen, M., 1992. Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1): 106–124.
34. Dubois, B. L., and Crouch, I., 1975. The question of tag questions in women's speech: They don't use more of them do they?. Language in Society, 4: 289–294.
35. Eakins, B. W., and Eakins, R. G., 1978. Sex differences in human communication, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
36. Entwisle, D. R., and Garvey, C., 1972. Verbal productivity and adjective usage. Language and Speech, 15: 288–298.
37. Erickson, B., Lind, A. E., Johnson, B. C., and O'Barr, W. M., 1978. Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14: 266–279.
38. Ferguson, N., 1977. Simultaneous speech interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16: 295–302.
39. Fishman, P. M., 1978. Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25: 397–406.
40. Frey, L. R., ed. 1994. Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Graddol, D., and Swann, J., 1989. Gender voice, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
42. Grob, L. M., and Allen, M., 1996. Sex differences in powerful/powerless language: A meta-analytical review. Paper presented to the Central States Communication Association. April1996, Minneapolis.
43. Haleta, L. L., 1996. Student perceptions of teacher's use of language: The effects of powerful and powerless language on impression formation and uncertainty. Communication Education, 45: 16–28.
44. Hall, D., and Langellier, K., 1988. “ Storytelling strategies in mother-daughter communication ”. In Women communicating: Studies of women's talk, Edited by: Bate, B., and Taylor, A., 107–126. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. Harlan, A., and Weiss, C. L., 1982. “ Sex differences in factors affecting managerial career advancement ”. In Women in the workplace, Edited by: Wallace, P. A., 59–100. Boston: Auburn.
46. Hatfield, J. D., and Weider-Hatfield, D., 1978. The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis. Communication Monographs, 45: 44–50.
47. Heiss, J., 1962. Degree of intimacy and male-female interaction. Sociometry, 25: 197–208.
48. Henley, N. M., and Kramarae, C., 1991. “ Gender, power, and miscommunication ”. In The women and language debate: A sourcebook, Edited by: Roman, C., Juhasz, S., and Miller, C., 383–406. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49. Holmes, J., 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence. Te Reo, 27: 47–62.
50. Hosman, L. A., 1989. The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15: 383–406.
51. Hosman, L. A., and Wright, J. W., II. 1987. The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 51: 173–188.
52. Inman, C., 1996. “ Friendships between men: Closeness in the doing ”. In Gendered relationships, Edited by: Wood, J. T., 95–110. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
53. Johnson, F. L., 1989. “ Women's culture and communication: An analytical perspective ”. In Beyond boundaries: Sex and gender diversity in communication, Edited by: Lont, C. M., and Friedley, S. A., 301–316. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
54. Kanter, R. M., 1977. Men and women of the corporation, New York: Basic Books.
55. Kennedy, C. W., and Camden, C. T., 1981. Gender differences in interruption behavior: A dominance perspective. International Journal of Women's Studies, 4: 18–25.
56. Kennedy, C. W., and Camden, C. T., 1983. A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47: 45–48.
57. Kimble, C.E., Yoshikawa, J.C., and Zehr, H.D., 1981. Vocal and verbal assertiveness in same-sex and mixed-sex groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40: 1047–1054.
58. Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P., 1985. Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50: 34–46.
59. Kramarae, C., 1981. Women and men speaking: Frameworks for analysis, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
60. Krippendorff, K., 1980. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61. LaFrance, M., and Carmen, B., 1980. The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38: 36–49.
62. Lakoff, R., 1975a. Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2: 45–80.
63. Lakoff, R., 1975b. Language and woman's place, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
64. Lawler, E. E., III. 1991. High involvement management, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Lee, M. T., and Ofshe, R., 1981. The influence of behavioral style and status characteristics on social influence: A test of two competing theories. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44: 73–82.
66. Leik, R. K., 1963. Instrumentality and emotionality in family interaction. Sociometry, 26: 131–145.
67. Lesch, C. L., 1994. “ Observing theory in practice: Sustaining consciousness in a coven ”. In Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups, Edited by: Frey, L., 57–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68. Lublin, J. S., 1992. Trying to increase worker productivity, more employers alter management style. The Wall Street Journal, February 13: B1
69. Magjuka, R. J., and Baldwin, T. T., 1991. Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44: 793–812.
70. Maltz, D. N., and Borker, R., 1982. “ A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication ”. In Language and social identity, Edited by: Gumperz, J. J., 196–216. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. Marche, T. A., and Peterson, C., 1993. The development and sex-related use of interruption behavior. Human Communication Research, 19: 388–408.
72. Marlatt, G. A., 1970. A comparison of vicarious and direct reinforcement control of verbal behavior in an interview setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16: 695–703.
73. McCarrick, A. K., Manderscheid, R. W., and Silbergeld, S., 1981. Gender differences in competition and dominance during married-couples group therapy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44: 164–177.
74. McMillan, J.R., Clifton, A.K., McGrath, D., and Gale, W.S., 1977. Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality. Sex Roles, 3: 545–559.
75. Meyers, R.A., and Brashers, D.E., 1994. Expanding the boundaries of small group communication research: Exploring a feminist perspective. Communication Studies, 45: 68–85.
76. Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E., Winston, L., and Grob, L., in press. Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation. Communication Studies.
77. Morrill, C., and Facciola, P. C., 1992. The power of language in adjudication and mediation: Institutional contexts as predictors of social evaluation. Law and Social Inquiry, 17: 191–212.
78. Mulac, A., Wiemann, J.M., Widenmann, S.J., and Gibson, T.W., 1988. Male/female language differences in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55: 315–335.
79. Murray, E. J., 1956. A content-analysis method for studying psychotherapy. Psychological Monographs, 70 (420) 13
80. Natale, M., Entin, E., and Jaffe, J., 1979. Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 865–878.
81. Newcombe, N., and Arnkoff, D. B., 1979. Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1293–1303.
82. O'Barr, W. M., 1982. Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom, New York: Academic Press.
83. Octigan, M., and Niederman, S., 1979. Male dominance in conversation. Frontiers, 4: 50–54.
84. Pearson, S. S., 1981. “ Rhetoric and organizational change: New applications of feminine style ”. In Outsiders on the inside: Women and organizations, Edited by: Forisha, B. L., and Goldman, B. H., 55–74. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
85. Pearson, J. C., Turner, L. H., and Todd-Mancillas, W., 1991. Gender and communication, (2nd ed.), Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
86. Piliavin, J. A., and Martin, P. R., 1978. The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction. Sex Roles, 4: 281–296.
87. Preisler, B., 1986. Linguistic sex roles in conversation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
88. Propp, K. M., 1995. An experimental examination of biological sex as a status cue in decision-making groups and its influence on information use. Small Group Research, 26: 451–474.
89. Putnam, L. L., 1982. In search of gender: A critique of communication and sex role research. Women's Studies in Communication, 5: 1–9.
90. Ragan, S. L., 1989. “ Communication between the sexes: A consideration of differences in adult communication ”. In Life-span communication: Normative processes, Edited by: Nussbaum, J. F., 629–652. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
91. Shaw, M. E., and Sadler, O., 1965. Interaction patterns in heterosexual dyads varying in degree of intimacy. Journal of Social Psychology, 66: 345–351.
92. Simkins-Bullock, J.A., and Wildman, B.G., 1991. An investigation into the relationships between gender and language. Sex Roles, 24: 149–160.
93. Smith-Lovin, L., and Brody, C., 1989. Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54: 424–435.
94. Spender, D., 1984. Man made language, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
95. Staley, C.M., 1982. Sex-related differences in the style of children's language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11: 141–158.
96. Stutman, R.K., 1987. Witness disclaiming during examination. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 23: 96–101.
97. Tannen, D., 1987. That's not what I meant! How conversational style makes or breaks relationships, New York: Ballantine.
98. Tannen, D., 1990. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation, New York: William Morrow.
99. Tannen, D., 1994. Gender and discourse, New York: Oxford University Press.
100. Tannen, D., 1995. The power of talk: Who gets heard and why. Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct: 138–148.
101. Thorne, B., 1986. “ Girls and boys together.. but mostly apart: Gender arrangements in elementary schools ”. In Relationships and development, Edited by: Hartup, W. W., and Rubin, Z., 167–184. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102. Thorne, B., 1993. Gender play: Girls and boys in school, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
103. Treichler, P., and Kramarae, C., 1983. Women's talk in the ivory tower. Communication Quarterly, 31: 118–132.
104. Turner, L.H., Dindia, K., and Pearson, J.C., 1995. An investigation of female/male verbal behaviors in same-sex and mixed-sex conversations. Communication Reports, 8: 86–96.
105. Vrugt, A., and Kerkstra, A., 1984. Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Semiotica, 50: 1–41.
106. West, C., 1979. Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327: 81–97.
107. West, C., and Zimmerman, D.H., 1983. “ Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons ”. In Language, gender and society, Edited by: Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., and Henley, N., 102–117. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
108. Williams, C. L., 1989. Gender differences at work: Women and men in nontraditional occupations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
109. Wilkins, B. M., and Andersen, P. A., 1991. Gender differences and similarities in management communication: A meta-analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 5: 6–35.
110. Willis, F.N., and Williams, S.J., 1976. Simultaneous talking in conversation and sex of speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43: 1067–1070.
111. Wood, J. T., 1993. “ Enlarging conceptual boundaries: Research in interpersonal communication ”. In Transforming visions: Feminist critiques in communication studies, Edited by: Bowen, S., and Wyatt, N., 19–49. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
112. Wood, J. T., 1996. Gendered relationships, Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
113. Wood, J. T., 1997. Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture, (2nd ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
114. Wood, J. T., and Lenze, L. F., 1991. Gender and the development of self: Inclusive pedagogy in interpersonal communication. Women's Studies in Communication, 14: 1–23.
115. Wright, J. W., II. and Hosman, L. A., 1983. Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: The effects of the male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression formation. Southern Journal of Speech Communication, 48: 137–152.
116. Wyatt, N., 1984. “ Power and decision making ”. In Emergent issues in human decision-making, Edited by: Phillips, G. M., and Wood, J. T., 50–60. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
117. Wyatt, N., 1988. “ Shared leadership in the Weaver's Guild ”. In Women communicating: Studies of women's talk, Edited by: Bate, B., and Taylor, A., 147–176. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
118. Zimmer, L., 1988. Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35: 64–77.
119. Zimmerman, D.H., and West, C., 1975. “ Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation ”. In Language and sex: Difference and dominance, Edited by: Thorne, B., and Henley, N., 105–129. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.