Syntax in A Dynamic Brain

Synthese

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 343-355

  Garson, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Contemporary Theory; Epistemic Norm; Externalist Theory; Good Reason; Internalist Norm

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933480763     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004945312756     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chalmers, D.: 1990, ‘Syntactic Transformations on Distributed Representations’, Connection Science 2, 53–62.
2. Churchland, P.: 1988, Matter and Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Cummins, R.: 1992, ‘Conceptual Role Semantics and the Explanatory Role of Content’, Philosophical Studies 65, 103–21.
4. Egan, F.: 1991, ‘Propositional Attitudes and the Language of Thought’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21, 379–88.
5. Elman, J. L.: 1991, ‘Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure’, in Touretzky (1991), pp. 91–122.
6. Fodor, J.: 1987, Psychosemantics, MIT Press.
7. Fodor, J. and Z. Pylyshyn: 1988, ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, Cognition 28, 3–71.
8. Garson, J.: 1994, ‘Cognition without Classical Architecture’, Synthese 100, 291–305.
9. Garson, J.: 1994a, ‘No Representations without Rules: The Prospects for a Compromise Between Paradigms in Cognitive Science’, Mind and Language 9, 25–37.
10. Garson, J.: 1995, ‘Systematicity and Classical Architecture’, (manuscript) presented at the 1995 meetings of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology.
11. Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1989, ‘Representations Without Rules’, Philosophical Topics 17, 147–74.
12. Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1994, ‘Representations Don’t Need Rules: Reply to James Garson’, Mind and Language 9, 38–48.
13. Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1994a, ‘A Non-Classical Framework for Cognitive Science’, Synthese 101, 305–45.
14. Langton, C.: 1991, ‘Computation at the Edge of Chaos’, in S. Forrest (ed.), Emergent Computation, MIT Press.
15. Rumelhart, D., J. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group: 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. I, MIT Press, Ch. 4.
16. Port, Robert F.: 1990, ‘Representation and Recognition of Temporal Patterns’, Connection Science 2, 151–176.
17. Pylyshyn, Z.: 1984, Computation and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.
18. Schwartz, G.: 1992, ‘Connectionism, Processing, Memory’, Connection Science 4, 207–26.
19. Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleeremans, A. and McClelland, J.: 1991, ‘Graded State Machines: The Representation of Temporal Contingencies in Simple Recurrent Networks’, in Touretzky (1991), 57–89.
20. Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 1–74.
21. Smolensky, P., G. LeGendre, and Y. Miyata: 1992, ‘Principles for an Integrated Connectionist/Symbolic Theory of Higher Cognition’, Tech. Report 92-08, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado.
22. Touretzky, D.: 1991, Connectionist Approaches to Language Learning, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
23. van Gelder, T.: 1990, ‘Compositionality: Variations on a Classical Theme’, Cognitive Science 14, 355–84.