Communicative shifts in the regular fl-classroom and in the bilingual content classroom

IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 167-186

  Butzkamm, Wolfgang ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933480594     PISSN: 0019042X     EISSN: 16134141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/iral.1997.35.3.167     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bergentoft, R. Project No. 12: Learning and teaching modern languages for communication. Strasbourg, Council for Cultural Co-Operation. Council of Europe 1988.
2. Butzkamm, Wolfgang, Dodson, C.J. The teaching of communication from theory to practice; IRAL 4, 1980. S. 289–309.
3. Courcy, Michele de. Making sense of the Australian French immersion classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Vol. 14, No. 3, 1993.
4. Dinsmore, David. “Waiting for Godot in the EFL classroom” in: English Language Teaching Journal 39/4, October 1985. S.225–233.
5. Dodson, C. J. (ed.). Bilingual Education: Evaluation, assessment and methodology. Cardiff: Cardiff University of Wales Press 1985.
6. Donmall, Gillian: “Striving to communicate in a foreign language: the present situation in schools in the United Kingdom and a ‘language awareness’ approach” in: Bickley, V. (ed.): Language use, language teaching and the curriculum; Hong Kong: Institute of Language and Education 1990. S. 533–550.
7. Dulay, H. and Burt, M. “From research to method in bilingual education.” in: Alatis, J. (ed.): International dimensions of bilingual education, Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1978. S. 551–75.
8. Ellis, Rod. Classroom second language development. New York: Prentice Hall 1988.
9. Hammerly, Hector. French immersion: Myths and reality. Calgary/Alberta: Detselig 1989.
10. Hawkins, Eric W. Modern languages in the curriculum. Cambridge u.s.: Cambridge University Press 1981.
11. Hawkins, Eric. Intensive language teaching and Learning initiatives at school level. CILT, London 1988.
12. Krashen, Stephen D. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London & New York: Longman 1985.
13. Krashen, Stephen D.; Terrell, Tracey D. The natural approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1983.
14. Leisen, Josef. Über Sprachprobleme im deutschsprachigen Fachunterricht am Beispiel des Physikunterrichts. In: Zielsprache Deutsch 32, 3, 1991. S.143–151.
15. Long, M.; Sato, C. “Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teacher's questions” in: Seliger, H.; Long, M. (eds.) Classroom orientated research in second language acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House 1983.
16. Mitchell, R.; Parkinson, B.; Johnstone, R. The foreign language classroom. An observational study. Stirling Educational Monographs 9 (1981).
17. Mitchell, Rosamond: Communicative language teaching in practice; London: CILT 1988.
18. Nunan, D. Communicative language teaching: making it work. English Language Teaching Journal 41, 1987. S. 136–145.
19. Rutter, M. et al. Fifteen thousand hours. London: Butler and Tanner 1979.
20. Sajavaara, Kari: “Pseudocommunication in the classroom” in: Edelhoff, C; Candlin, C. (Hg.): Verstehen und Verständigung. Zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans-Eberhard Piepho, Bochum: Kamp 1989. S. 77–80.
21. Solmecke: Gert. “Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Vorschlage zu ihrer Anderung.” in: Englisch 19, 1984. S. 14–19.
22. Sperr, M. Treffpunkt Froschweiher oder die Sache mit dem Fahrrad. Miinchen: Bertelsmann 1982.
23. Stern, H. H. Fundamental concepts of language teaching. London: Oxford University Press 1983.
24. Tacke, O. Der Sprachunterricht mufi umkehrenl Leipzig 1923.
25. Vogeding, Joachim. “Wenn in einem gesattigten Wasser Kochsalz gibt…” Zur Lernbarkeit von Naturwissenschaften in der Fremdsprache Deutsch. Julius Groos Verlag: Heidelberg 1995.
26. Weir, R. Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton 1962.
27. Wright, Andrew; Betteridge, David; Buckby, Michael. Games for language learning. Cambridge University Press 1983.