The potential of human rights in a post-cultural world

Social Anthropology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 381-388

  Rapport, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933478111     PISSN: 09640282     EISSN: 14698676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.1998.tb00368.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. American Anthropological Association. 1947. ‘Statement on human rights’, American Anthropologist, 49(4), 539–43.
2. Auge, M. 1995. Non-places. Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.
3. Barth, F. 1992 Towards a greater naturalism in conceptualising societies’, In A. Kuper (ed.), Conceptualising Society. London: Routledge.
4. Geertz, C. 1983. Local knowledge. New York: Basic.
5. Gellner, E. 1993. Postmodernism, reason and religion. London: Routledge.
6. Marcus, G. and Fischer, M. 1986. Anthropology as cultural critique. An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Rapport, N. J. 1997. Transcendent individual: Towards a liberal and literary anthropology. London: Routledge.
8. Ricoeur, P. 1996. ‘Reflections on a new ethos for Europe’, In R. Kearney (ed.), Paul Ricoeur. The hermeneutics of action. London: Sage.
9. Rorty, R. 1986. ‘On ethnocentrism: A reply to Clifford Geertz’, Michigan Quarterly Review, 25 (Winter), 525–34.
10. Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Rorty, R. 1992. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Weissbrodt, W. 1988. ‘Human rights: An historical perspective’, In P. Davies (ed.), Human rights London: Routledge.