Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial

The Lancet

Volumn 385, Issue 9978, 2015, Pages 1623-1633

  Prestmo, Anders ^a,b   Hagen, Gunhild ^a   Sletvold, Olav ^a,b   Helbostad, Jorunn L ^a,b   Thingstad, Pernille ^a   Taraldsen, Kristin ^a   Lydersen, Stian ^a   Halsteinli, Vidar ^a,c   Saltnes, Turi ^d   Lamb, Sarah E ^e   Johnsen, Lars G ^a,b   Saltvedt, Ingvild ^a,b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c University Hospital of Trondheim ^*  (Norway)

^d Norwegian Directorate of Health   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC CARE; HIP FRACTURE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NURSING HOME; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ORTHOPEDICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE BATTERY SCORE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE; HIP FRACTURES; HOSPITAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMPONENTS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; NORWAY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP FRACTURES; HOSPITAL UNITS; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; NORWAY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84933279096     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 2575-86.
2. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 2013; 8: 136.
3. Auais M, Morin S, Nadeau L, Finch L, Mayo N. Changes in frailty-related characteristics of the hip fracture population and their implications for healthcare services: evidence from Quebec, Canada. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 2713-24.
4. Bentler SE, Liu L, Obrizan M, et al. The aftermath of hip fracture: discharge placement, functional status change, and mortality. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 170: 1290-99.
5. Bertram M, Norman R, Kemp L, Vos T. Review of the long-term disability associated with hip fractures. Injury Prev 2011; 17: 365-70.
6. Nikitovic M, Wodchis WP, Krahn MD, Cadarette SM. Direct health-care costs attributed to hip fractures among seniors: a matched cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 659-69.
7. Adunsky A, Arad M, Levi R, Blankstein A, Zeilig G, Mizrachi E. Five-year experience with the 'Sheba' model of comprehensive orthogeriatric care for elderly hip fracture patients. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 1123-27.
8. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, O'Neill D, Langhorne P, Robinson D. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 7: CD006211.
9. British Orthopaedic Association. The care of patients with fragility fracture. British Orthopaedic Association, 2007.
10. Kammerlander C, Roth T, Friedman SM, et al. Ortho-geriatric service - a literature review comparing different models. Osteoporos Int 2010; 21 (suppl 4): S637-46.
11. Giusti A, Barone A, Razzano M, Pizzonia M, Pioli G. Optimal setting and care organization in the management of older adults with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011; 47: 281-96.
12. Watne LO, Torbergsen AC, Conroy S, et al. The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric trial). BMC Med 2014; 12: 63.
13. Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, et al. Effect of in-hospital comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older people with hip fracture. The protocol of the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial. BMC Geriatr 2011; 11: 18.
14. Saltvedt I, Prestmo A, Einarsen E, Johnsen LG, Helbostad JL, Sletvold O. Development and delivery of patient treatment in the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial. A new geriatric in-hospital pathway for elderly patients with hip fracture. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 355.
15. Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 1288-94.
16. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29.
17. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M221-31.
18. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-48.
19. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
20. Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1993; 22: 419-24.
21. O'Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, et al. Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes scores: a Texas Alzheimer's research consortium study. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 1091-95.
22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98.
23. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095-108.
24. Kempen GI, Yardley L, van Haastregt JC, et al. The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing 2008; 37: 45-50.
25. Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; 24: 709-11.
26. Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, et al. Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures. Injury 2013; 44: 1403-12.
27. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 743-49.
28. Twisk JW, de Vente W. The analysis of randomised controlled trial data with more than one follow-up measurement. A comparison between different approaches. Eur J Epidemiol 2008; 23: 655-60.
29. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, 2007.
30. Peasgood T, Herrmann K, Kanis JA, Brazier JE. An updated systematic review of Health State Utility Values for osteoporosis related conditions. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20: 853-68.
31. Glick HA, Briggs AH, Polsky D. Quantifying stochastic uncertainty and presenting results of cost-effectiveness analyses. Expert Rev Pharmacoecons Outcomes Res 2001; 1: 25-36.
32. Cook J, Drummond M, Heyse JF. Economic endpoints in clinical trials. Stat Methods Med Res 2004; 13: 157-76.
33. Volpato S, Cavalieri M, Guerra G, et al. Performance-based functional assessment in older hospitalized patients: feasibility and clinical correlates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008; 63: 1393-98.
34. Shyu YI, Liang J, Wu CC, et al. Two-year effects of interdisciplinary intervention for hip fracture in older Taiwanese. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58: 1081-89.
35. Wu CY, Chuang LL, Lin KC, Lee SD, Hong WH. Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1281-87.
36. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1523-32.
37. Stein J, Luppa M, Maier W, et al. Assessing cognitive changes in the elderly: reliable change indices for the Mini-Mental State Examination. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2012; 126: 208-18.
38. Hauer KA, Kempen GI, Schwenk M, et al. Validity and sensitivity to change of the falls efficacy scales international to assess fear of falling in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Gerontology 2011; 57: 462-72.
39. Taraldsen K, Sletvold O, Thingstad P, et al. Physical behavior and function early after hip fracture surgery in patients receiving comprehensive geriatric care or orthopedic care - a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014; 69: 338-45.
40. Ginsberg G, Adunsky A, Rasooly I. A cost-utility analysis of a comprehensive orthogeriatric care for hip fracture patients, compared with standard of care treatment. Hip Int 2013; 23: 570-75.
41. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ 2005; 14: 487-96.