GENTRIFICATION AND THE RIGHT TO THE CITY: COMMUNITY CONFLICT AND CASINOS

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 503-517

  Balzarini, John E ^a   Shlay, Anne B ^b  

^a DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAMBLING; GENTRIFICATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; NEOLIBERALISM; SOCIAL CONFLICT;

PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84933059372     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: 14679906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/juaf.12226     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adams, C., Bartelt, D., Elesh, D., & Goldstein, I. (2008). Restructuring the Philadelphia region. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2. Adams, C., Bartelt, D., Elesh, D., Goldstein, I., Kleniewski, N., & Yancey, W. (1991). Philadelphia: Neighborhoods, division, and conflict in a postindustrial city. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
3. Alinsky, S. D. (1971). Rules for radicals. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
4. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Attoh, K. A. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35, 669–685.
6. Baxamusa, M. H. (2008). Empowering communities through deliberation: The model of community benefits agreements. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 261–276.
7. Beauregard, R. A. (1986). The chaos and the complexity of gentrification. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification of the city (pp. 35–55). Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
8. Beauregard, R. A. (1990). Trajectories of neighborhood change: The case of gentrification. Environment and Planning, 22, 855–874.
9. Berry, B. J. L. (1985). Islands of renewal in seas of decay. In P. Peterson (Ed.), The new urban reality (pp. 69–96). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
10. Binzen, P. (1970). Whitetown, U.S.A. New York, NY: Random House.
11. Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit. City, 13, 176–184.
12. Brown-Saracino, J. (2009). A neighborhood that never changes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Budds, J., Teixeira, P., & SEHAB. (2005). Ensuring the right to the city: Pro-poor housing, urban development and tenure legalization in São Paulo, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization, 17(1), 89–113.
14. Butler, T. (1993). Living in a bubble: Gentrification and its “others” in northern London. Urban Studies, 40, 2469–2486.
15. Calvano, L., & Andersson, L. (2010). Hitting the jackpot (or not): An attempt to extract value in Philadelphia's casino controversy. Organization, 17, 583–597.
16. Cummings, S. (2007). The emergence of community benefits agreements. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law, 17(2), 6–7.
17. Cuthbert, A. R. (1995). The right to the city: Surveillance, private interest and the public domain in Hong Kong. Cities, 12, 293–310.
18. Deener, A. (2012). Venice: A contested bohemia in Los Angeles. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Dikeç, M. (2002). Police, politics and the right to the city. GeoJournal, 58, 91–98.
20. Doucet, B. (2009). Living through gentrification: Subjective experiences of local, non-gentrifying residents in Leith, Edinburgh. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, 299–315.
21. Fawaz, M. (2009). Neoliberal urbanity and the right to the city: A view from Beirut's periphery. Development and Change, 40, 827–852.
22. Fernandes, E. (2007). Constructing the “right to the city” in Brazil. Social and Legal Studies, 16, 201–219.
23. Fischel, W. A. (2004). An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies, 41, 317–340.
24. Freeman, L. (2006). There goes the ʼhood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
25. Goodman, R. (1995). The luck business. New York, NY: The Free Press.
26. Gotham, K. F., & Haubert, J. (2006). Neoliberal revitalization: Prison building, casinos, and tourism in Louisiana. In T. A. Gibson & M. Lowes (Eds.), Urban communication (pp. 25–40). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
27. Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28. Hackworth, J., & Smith, N. (2001). The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92, 464–477.
29. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
30. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London, UK: Verso.
31. Katznelson, I. (1981). City trenches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Kerkstra, P. (2012, February 28). Book misassigns blame for Fishtown's troubles. Philly.com. Retrieved from http://articles.philly.com/2012--0228/news/31107782_1_charles-murray-influential-books-manufacturing-jobs
33. Lefebvre, H. (1991) [1968]. The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
35. Levine, J. (2005). Zoned out: Regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land use. Oxford, UK: RFF Press.
36. Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
37. Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13, 185–197.
38. Massey, D. S. (2008). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. Massey, D. S., Albright, L., Casciano, R., Derickson, E., & Kinsey, D. N. (2013). Climbing Mount Laurel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Mayer, M. (2009). The “right to the city” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13, 362–374.
42. Mazer, K. M., & Rankin, K. N. (2011). The social space of gentrification: The politics of neighborhood accessibility in Toronto's Downtown West. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 822–839.
43. McCann, E. J. (1999). Race, protest, and public space: Contextualizing Lefebvre in the U.S. city. Antipode, 31, 163–184.
44. McCann, E. J. (2002). Space, citizenship, and the right to the city: A brief overview. GeoJournal, 58, 77–79.
45. Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People's Park, definitions of the public, and democracy. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 108–133.
46. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47. Murray, C. (2012). Coming apart. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
48. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2013). Philadelphia 2013: The state of the city. Retrieved from www.pewtrusts.org/philaresearch
49. Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.
50. Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 564–590.
51. Purcell, M. (2006). Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, 43, 1921–1941.
52. Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36, 141–154.
53. Rosen, G., & Shlay, A. B. (2014). Whose right to Jerusalem? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 935–950.
54. Salkin, P. E., & Lavine, A. (2008). Negotiating for social justice and the promise of community benefits agreements: Case studies of current and developing agreements. Journal of Affordable Housing, 17(2), 113–144.
55. Schmelzkopf, K. (2002). Incommensurability, land use, and the right to space: Community gardens in New York City. Urban Geography, 23, 323–343.
56. Shaw, S., & Sullivan, D. M. (2011). “White night”: Gentrification, racial exclusion, and perceptions and participation in the arts. City and Community, 10, 241–264.
57. Small, M. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58. Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 538–548.
59. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. New York, NY: Routledge.
60. Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as a global urban strategy. Antipode, 34, 427–450.
61. Spain, D. (1993). Been-heres versus come-heres: Negotiating conflicting community identities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 156–171.
62. Staeheli, L. A., Mitchell, D., & Gibson, K. (2002). Conflicting rights to the city in New York's community gardens. GeoJournal, 58, 197–205.
63. Stillerman, J. (2006). The politics of space and culture in Santiago, Chile's street markets. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 507–530.
64. Sugrue, T. J. (1995). Crabgrass-roots politics: Race, rights, and the reaction against liberalism in the urban north, 1940–1964. The Journal of American History, 82, 551–578.
65. Teague, M. (2007, June). Rendell's slots debacle: The true saga of how Ed screwed the city. Philadelphia Magazine, pp. 108–111, 156–161.
66. Weinstein, L., & Ren, X. (2009). The changing right to the city: Urban renewal and housing rights in globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai. City and Community, 8, 407–432.
67. Wolf-Powers, L. (2010). Community benefits agreements and local government. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 141–159.