Erratum: Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations (Scientific Reports 5: (11539) doi: 10.1038/srep11539;Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Mollica, Luca ^a   Decherchi, Sergio ^a,b   Zia, Syeda Rehana ^a   Gaspari, Roberto ^a   Cavalli, Andrea ^a,c   Rocchia, Walter ^a  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b BiKi Technologies srl   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE A2A RECEPTOR; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90; LIGAND; MOLECULAR CHAPERONE GRP78; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

BINDING SITE; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; TIME FACTOR;

BINDING SITES; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP90 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; RECEPTOR, ADENOSINE A2A; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84932644762     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep25299     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Copeland, R. A., Pompliano, D. L. & Meek, T. D. Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead optimization, Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 5, 730-739 (2006).
2. Swinney, D. C. Biochemical mechanisms of drug action: what does it take for success?, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 801-808 (2004).
3. Buch, I., Giorgino, T. & De Fabritiis, G. Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations, PNAS 108, 10184-10189 (2011).
4. Y. Shan et al., How does a drug molecule find its target binding site?, JACS 133, 9181-9183 (2011).
5. Decherchi, S., Berteotti, A., Bottegoni, G., Rocchia, W. & Cavalli, A. The ligand binding mechanism to purine nucleoside phosphorylase elucidated via molecular dynamics and machine learning, Nat. Comm. 6, 6155 (2015).
6. Dror, R. O., Young, C. & Shaw, D. E. Anton, a Special-Purpose Molecular Simulation Machine, in Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing, (eds Padua, D. et al.) 60-71 (Springer US, 2011).
7. Tiwarya, P., Limongelli, V., Salvalaglio, M. & Parrinello, M. Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding: Predicting pathways, rates, and rate-limiting steps, PNAS 112, E386-E391 (2015).
8. Mark, A. E., Van Gunsteren, W. F. & Berendsen, H. J. Calculation of Relative Free-Energy via Indirect Pathways, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 3808-3816 (1991).
9. Tsujishita, H, Moriguchi, I. & Hirono, S. Potential-Scaled Molecular Dynamics and Potential Annealing: Effective Conformational Search Techniques for Biomolecules, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 4416-4420 (1993).
10. Sinko, W., Miao, Y., de Oliveira, C. A. F. & McCammon, J. A. Population Based Reweighting of Scaled Molecular Dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. B, 117, 12759-12768 (2013).
11. Arrhenius, S. A. Über die Dissociationswärme und den Einflusß der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elektrolyte, Z. Physik. Chem. 4, 96-116 (1889).
12. Schmidtke, P., Luque, F. J., Murray, J. B. & Barril, X. Shielded hydrogen bonds as structural determinants of binding kinetics: application in drug design, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18903-18910 (2011).
13. Macias, A. T., et al. Adenosine-derived inhibitors of 78 kDa glucose regulated protein (Grp78) ATPase: insights into isoform selectivity, J. Med. Chem. 54, 4034-4041 (2011).
14. Congreve, M., et al., Discovery of 1,2,4-triazine derivatives as adenosine A(2A) antagonists using structure based drug design, J. Med. Chem. 55, 1898-903 (2012).
15. Shah, U. & Hodgson, R. Recent progress in the discovery of adenosine A2A receptor antagonists for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 13, 466-480 (2010).
16. Efron, B., Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife, Ann. Statist., 7, 1-26 (1979).
17. Harvey, M., Giupponi, G. & De Fabritiis, G. ACEMD: Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations in the microseconds timescale, J. Chem. Theory and Comput. 5, 1632 (2009)
18. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A., Development and Testing of a General Amber Force Field, J. Comp. Chem., 25, 1157-1174 (2004).
19. Pronk, S., et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit, Bioinformatics 29, 845-54 (2013).
20. Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W. D. & Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269-10280 (1993).
21. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926-935 (1983).
22. Darden, T., Perera, L., Li, L. & Pedersen L. New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations, Structure 7, R55-R60 (1999).
23. Bussi G et al. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
24. Jeffrey, G. A. An introduction to hydrogen bonding (Oxford University Press, 1997)
25. Silverman, R. B. & Hollada, M. W. The Organic Chemistry of Drug Design and Drug Action (Academic Press, 2014)
26. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations, J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463-1472 (1997).