Symmetry is less than meets the eye

Current Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2015, Pages R267-R268

  Apthorp, Deborah ^a,b   Bell, Jason ^a,c  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL FIELD;

FACE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84932642053     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.017     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Wagemans, J. (1995). Detection of visual symmetries. Spat. Vis. 9, 9-32.
2. Moller, A.P., and Sorci, G. (1998). Insect preference for symmetrical artificial flowers. Oecologia 114, 37-42.
3. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J.M., and Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 5, 659-669.
4. Burr, D., and Ross, J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Curr. Biol. 18, 425-428.
5. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61, 183-193.
6. Shannon, C.E. (1951). Prediction and entropy of printed english. Bell System Tech. J. 30, 50-64.
7. Glass, L. (1969). Moire effect from random dots. Nature 223, 578-580.
8. Dakin, S.C., Tibber, M.S., Greenwood, J.A., Kingdom, F.A.A., and Morgan, M.J. (2011). A common visual metric for approximate number and density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19552-19557.
9. Locher, P.J., and Nodine, C.F. (1973). Influence of stimulus symmetry on visual scanning patterns. Percept. Psychophys. 13, 408-412.
10. Reber, R., Wurtz, P., Knapstad, M., and Lervik, L.V. (2010). Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 219-223.