Alternative knowledge structures in creative thought: Schema, associations, and cases

Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 117-136

  Mumford, Michael D ^a   Blair, Cassie S ^a   Marcy, Richard T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84932622781     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511606915.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Adams, R. J., & Ericsson A. E. (2000). Introduction to cognitive processes of expert pilots. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 44-62.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Antonietti, A. (1946). Source processing influences on analogical problem-solving. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 249-259.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Monnis (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 24-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77-100.
6. Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
7. Berger, C. R., & Jordan, J. M. (1992). Planning sources, planning difficulty, and verbal fluency. Communication Monographs, 59, 130-148.
8. Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 123-150.
9. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
10. Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). A cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the Telephone. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 48-79). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Bassock, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Selfexplanation: How students study and use examples to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
12. Clement, J. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem-solving. Cognitive Science, 12, 563-586.
13. Coney, S., & Serna, P. (1995). Creative thinking from an information processing perspective: A new approach to Merrick's Theory of Associative Hierarchies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 109-133.
14. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: Houghton.
16. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
17. Estes, W. K. (1991). Cognitive architectures from the standpoint of an experimental psychologist. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 1-28.
18. Estes, Z., & Ward, J. B. (2002). The emergence of novel attributes in concept modification. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 149-156.
19. Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2, 3-47.
20. Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169-188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). New approaches to effective leadership: Cognitive resources and organizational performances. New York: Wiley.
22. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Getzels, J.W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
24. Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C.W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 30-43). New York:Wiley.
25. Gruszka, A., & Necka, E. (2002). Priming and acceptance of close and remote associations by creative and less creative people. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 174-192.
26. Hammond, K. J. (1990). Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14, 385-443.
27. Hershey, D. A., Walsh, D. A., Read, S. J., & Chulef, A. S. (1990). Effects of expertise on financial problem-solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 77-101.
28. Holyoak, K. J., & Kroger, J. K. (1996). Forms of reasoning: Insight into prefrontal functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 106, 253-263.
29. Howe, M. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality of myth? Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 399-442.
30. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
31. Hydenbluth, C., & Hesse, F.W. (1996). Impact of superficial similarity in the application phase of analogical problem-solving. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 37-57.
32. Jani, N., & Levine, D. S. (2000). A neural network theory of propositional analogymaking. Neural Networks, 13, 149-183.
33. Keane, M. (1987). On retrieving analogies when solving problems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 29-41.
34. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
35. Kolodner, J. L., & Simpson, R. L. (1989). The mediator: Analysis of an early casebased problem-solver. Cognitive Science, 13, 507-549.
36. Koplinka, L., Brandan, R., & Lemmon, A. (1988). Case-based reasoning for continuous control. In J. L. Kolodner (Ed.) Proceedings: Workshop on case-based reasoning (pp. 116-136). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
37. Kubose, T. T., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2002). The role of textual coherence in incremental analogical mapping. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 407-435.
38. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of idea appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal., 16, 231-246.
40. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.
41. Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.
42. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 3, 220-232.
43. Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J.W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-21.
44. Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 253-266.
45. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., & Maher, M. A. (1996). Processbased measures of creative problem-solving skills. Part II: Information encoding. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 77-88.
46. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills. Part I: Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 63-76.
47. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., & Gaddis, B. (2003). How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 411-432.
48. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, C. (1991). Process-analytic models of creative capabilities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.
49. Mumford, M. D., Peterson, N. G., & Childs, R. A. (1999). Basic and cross-functional skills: Taxonomies, measures, and findings in assessing job skill requirements. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, U. C. Boaman, P. R. Jeanrenet, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational informational system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 49-70).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50. Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem-solving, and creativity (pp. 3-39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213-240.
52. Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Baughman, W. A., Costanza, D. P., & Threlfall, K. V. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills. Part V: Overall prediction. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 77-85.
53. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
54. Noice, H. (1991). The role of explanations and plan recognition in the learning of theatrical scripts. Cognitive Science, 15, 425-460.
55. Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 145-153.
56. Oliver, K. (2001). Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study. ETR & D, 49, 5-32.
57. Parnes, S. J., & Noller, R. B. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: Part results of a two year program. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 164-186.
58. Patalano, A. L., & Seifert, C. M. (1997). Opportunistic planning: Being reminded of pending goals. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1-36.
59. Phye, G. D. (1990). Inductive problem-solving: Schema inducement and memorybased transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 826-831.
60. Poliastro, E. (1995). Creative intuition: An integrative review. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 99-113.
61. Radvansky, G. A. (1994). Mental systems, representation, and process. In C. E. Williams (Ed.), Associated systems theory: A systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons (pp. 982-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288-302.
63. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-325.
64. Reber, A. S. (1992). An evolutionary context for the cognitive unconscious. Philosophical Psychology, 5, 33-51.
65. Reber, A. S., Kassin, S. M., Lewis, S., & Cantor, L.W. (1980).Onthe relation between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 492-502.
66. Reber, P. J., Knowlton, B., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Dissociable properties of memory systems: Differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 861-871.
67. Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R.W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 381-400.
68. Rostan, S. M. (1994). Problem finding, problem-solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 92-110.
69. Rothenberg, A. (1987). To error is human: The role of error in creativity and psychotherapy. In D. P. Schwarz, J. L. Sacksteder, & Y. Aksbane (Eds.), Attachment and the Therapeutic Process: Essays in Honor of Otto Allen Will, Jr. (pp. 155-181). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
70. Rothenberg, A. (1994). Studies in the creative process: An empirical investigation. In J. M. Massing & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on object relations theory (pp. 145-245). New York: Wiley.
71. Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (in press). Conceptual combination: Alternate knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal.
72. Seifert, C. M., Hammond, K. J., Johnson, H. M., Converse, T. M., McDougal, T. F., & Vanderstoep, S.W. (1994). Case-based learning: Predictive features in indexing. Archive Learning, 16, 37-56.
73. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). A three facet model of creativity: In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 124-147). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
74. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1998). Cognitive conceptions of expertise and their relations to giftedness. R. C. Freidman & K. B. Rodgers (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 177-191). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
75. Sternberg, R. J., & O'Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.
77. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
78. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 1-10.
80. Weisburg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theory. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226-250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Xiao, Y., Milgram, P., & Doyle, D. J. (1997). Planning behavior and its functional role in interactions with complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 27, 313-325.
82. Zook, K. B. (1991). Effects of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 41-71.