Cognition-centered conservation as a means of advancing integrative animal behavior

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-6

  Roth, Timothy C ^a   Krochmal, Aaron R ^b  

^a FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; AVERSIVE BEHAVIOR; BIODIVERSITY; BUFO MARINUS; COGNITION; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; FISH; HABITAT QUALITY; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; NONHUMAN; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; REVIEW; SALMON; SPECIES COMPOSITION; TADPOLE;

EID: 84932606553     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23521546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.05.008     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Cooke S.J., Blumstein D.T., Buchholz R., Caro T., Fernandez-Juricic E., Franklin C.E., Metcalfe J., O'Connor C.M., St.Clair C.C., Sutherland W.J., et al. Physiology behavior, and conservation. Physiol Biochem Zool 2014, 87:1-14.
2. Buchholz R. Behavioural biology: an effective and relevant conservation tool. Trends Ecol Evol 2007, 22:401-407.
3. Griffin A., Blumstein D.T., Evans C.S. Training captive-bred or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conserv Biol 2000, 14:1317-1326.
4. Blumstein D., Frenandez-Juricic E. A Primer on Conservation Behavior 2010, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
5. Schakner Z., Blumstein D.T. Learning and conservation behavior: an introduction and overview. Conservation Behavior: Applying Behavioral Ecology to Wildlife Conservation and Management 2016, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (in press). O. Berger-Tal, D. Saltz (Eds.).
6. Caro T. Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far?. Trends Ecol Evol 2007, 22:394-400.
7. Angeloni L., Schlaepfer M.A., Lawler J.J., Crooks K.R. A reassessment of the interface between conservation and behaviour. Anim Behav 2008, 75:731-737.
8. Caro T., Sherman P.W. Eighteen reasons animal behaviourists avoid involvement in conservation. Anim Behav 2013, 85:305-312.
9. Berger-Tal O., Polak T., Oron A., Lubin Y., Kotler B.P., Saltz D. Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework. Behav Ecol 2011, 22:236-239.
10. Candolin U., Wong B.B.M. Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Brown C. Experience and learning in changing environments. Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences 2012, 46-62. Oxford University Press, Oxford. U. Candolin, B. Wong (Eds.).
12. Greggor A.L., Clayton N.S., Phalan B., Thornton A. Comparative cognition for conservationists. Trends Ecol Evol 2014, 29:489-495.
13. Sih A. Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview. Anim Behav 2013, 85:1077-1088.
14. Shettleworth S. Cognition, Evolution and Behavior 2010, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Dukas R. Evolutionary biology of animal cognition. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2004, 35:347-374.
16. Schakner Z.A., Petelle M.B., Berger-Tal O., Owen M.A., Blumstein D.T. Developing effective tools for conservation behaviorists: reply to Greggor et al. Trends Ecol Evol 2014, 29:651-652.
17. International Union for Conservation of Nature The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013, http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
18. Naumann R.K., Ondracek J.M., Reiter S., Shein-Idelson M., Tosches M.A., Yamawaki T.M., Laurent G. The reptilian brain. Curr Biol 2015, 25:R317-R321.
19. Powers A.S., Houge P., Lynch C., Gattuso B., Lissek S., Nayal C. Role of acetylcholine in negative patterning in turtles (Chrysemys picta). Behav Neurosci 2009, 123:804-809.
20. Demski L.S. The pallium and mind/behavior relationships in teleost fishes. Brain Behav Evol 2013, 82:31-44.
21. Northcutt R.G. Variation in reptilian brains and cognition. Brain Behav Evol 2013, 82:45-54.
22. Burghardt G.M. Play in fishes, frogs, and reptiles. Curr Biol 2015, 25:9-10.
23. Salas C., Broglio C., Rodriguez F. Evolution of forebrain and spatial cognition in vertebrates: conservation across diversity. Brain Behav Evol 2003, 62:72-82.
24. LaDage L.D., Roth T.C., Cerjanic A.M., Sinervo B., Pravosudov V.V. Spatial memory: are lizards really deficient?. Biol Lett 2012, 8:939-941.
25. Roth T.C., Krochmal A.R. The role of age-specific learning and experience for turtles navigating a changing landscape. Curr Biol 2015, 25:333-337.
26. Emer S.A., Mora C.V., Harvey M.T., Grace M.S. Predators in training: operant conditioning of novel behavior in wild Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivitattus). Anim Cogn 2015, 18:269-278.
27. Rubenstein D.R., Hofmann H., Akcay E., Alonzo A., Archie E., Beery A., Calisi-Rodríguez R., Carleton K., Chow B., Dubnau J., et al. New Frontiers for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior 2014, National Science Foundation, http://www.nsf.gov/bio/pubs/reports/New_Frontiers_for_the_Integrative_Study_of_Animal_Behavior_workshop_report.pdf.
28. Shettleworth S.J. Animal cognition: deconstructing avian insight. Curr Biol 2009, 19:R1039-R1040.
29. Sih A., Ferrari M.C.O., Harris D.J. Evolution and behavioral responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. Evol Appl 2011, 4:367-387.
30. Sol D., Duncan R.P., Blackburn T.M., Cassey P., Lefebvre L. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:5460-5465.
31. Sol D., Bacher S., Reader S.M., Lefebvre L. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am Nat 2008, 172:S63-S71.
32. Kotrschal A., Taborsky B. Environmental change enhances cognitive abilities in fish. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000351.
33. Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale M.W., Evans H., Clout M., Bazzaz F.A. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 2000, 10:689-710.
34. Caller G., Brown C. Evolutionary responses to invasion: cane toad sympatric fish show enhanced avoidance learning. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e54909.
35. Putman N.F., Jenkins E.S., Michielsens C.G., Noakes D.L. Geomagnetic imprinting predicts spatio-temporal variation in homing migration of pink and sockeye salmon. J R Soc Interface 2014, 11:20140542.
36. Brothers J.R., Lohmann K.J. Evidence for geomagnetic imprinting and magnetic navigation in the natal homing of sea turtles. Curr Biol 2015, 25:392-396.
37. Primack R.B. A Primer of Conservation Biology 2012, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
38. Bostwick A., Higgins B.M., Landry A.M., McCracken M.L. novel use of a shark model to elicit innate behavioral responses in sea turtles: application to bycatch reduction in commercial fisheries. Chelonian Conserv Biol 2014, 13:237-246.
39. Connette G.M., Semlitsch R.D. Context-dependent movement behavior of woodland salamanders (Plethodon) in two habitat types. Zoology 2013, 116:325-330.
40. Pérez-Buitrago N., García M.A., Sabat A., Delgado J., Álvarez A., McMillan O., Funk S.M. Do headstart programs work? Survival and body condition in headstarted Mona Island iguanas Cyclura cornuta stejnegeri. Endanger Species Res 2008, 6:55-65.
41. Knox C.D., Monks J.M. Penning prior to release decreases post-translocation dispersal of jewelled geckos. Anim Conserv 2014, 17:18-26.
42. Seddon P.J., Griffiths C.J., Soorae P.S., Armstrong D.P. Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science 2014, 345:406-412.
43. Fredrickson L.H. Strategies for water level manipulations in moist-soil systems. Waterfowl Management Handbook 1991, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, (Chapter 13.4.6).
44. Blumstein D.T. Tinbergen's four questions. The Encyclopaedia of Applied Animal Behaviour and Welfare 2010, 605-606. CAB International. D. Mills (Ed.).
45. Sinervo B., Méndez-de-la-Cruz F.R., Miles D.B., Heulin B., Bastiaans E., Villagran-Santa Cruz M., Lara-Resendiz R., Martínez-Méndez N., Calderón-Espinosa M.L., Meza-Lázaro R.N., et al. Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 2010, 324:894-899.
46. Morris W.F., Doak D.F. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analyses 2002, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
47. Clark C.W. Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Mathematics of Conservation 2010, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken.
48. Wade P.R. Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 2000, 14:1308-1316.
49. McGarigal K., Cusham S., Stafford S. Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research 2000, Springer, New York.
50. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., Chan K.M.A., Daily G.C., Gold J. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 2009, 7:4-11.
51. Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Ann Rev Genet 1995, 29:305-327.
52. Wikelski M., Cooke S.J. Conservation physiology. Trends Ecol Evol 2006, 21:38-46.
53. Cooke S.J., Sack L., Franklin C.E., Farrell A.P., Beardall J., Wikelski M., Chown S.L. What is conservation physiology? Perspectives on an increasingly integrated and essential science. Conserv Physiol 2013, 1:1-23.