Situating the adoption of VGI by government

Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice

Volumn 9789400745872, Issue , 2013, Pages 65-81

  Johnson, Peter A ^a   Sieber, Renee E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLECTION PROCESS; DECISIONS MAKINGS; GOVERNMENT IS; INFORMATION COLLECTIONS; VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES;

EID: 84932602827     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Al-Kodmany, K. (2000). Using Web-Based technologies and geographic information systems in community planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 7 (1), 1-30.
2. Amin, A., Cameron, A., & Hudson, R. (2002). Placing the social economy. London: Routledge.
3. Brewer, G. A. (2006). Designing and implementing E-Government systems: Critical implications for public administration and democracy. Administration & Society, 38 (4), 472-499.
4. Budhathoki, N., Bruce, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, 72 (3), 149-160.
5. Budhathoki, N., Nedovic-Budic, Z., & Bruce, B. (2010). An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. Geomatica, 64 (1), 11-26.
6. Budic, Z. D. (1994). Effectiveness of geographic information systems in local planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60 (2), 244-263.
7. Carpi, T. (1997). The prospects for the social economy in a changing world. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 68 (2), 247-279.
8. Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R., & Turton, I. (2001). Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (6), 907-921.
9. Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of E-democracy in era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5 (1), 9-41.
10. Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17 (1), 1-23.
11. Crampton, J. (2009). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (1), 91-100.
12. De Longueville, B., Annoni, A., Schade, S., Ostlaender, N., & Whitmore, C. (2010). Digital earth's nervous system for crisis events: Real-time sensor web enablement of volunteered geographic information. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (3), 242-259.
13. Dovey, T., & Eggers, W. (2008). National issues dialogues Web 2.0: The future of collaborative government. Washington, DC: Deloitte Research.
14. Drummond, W., & French, S. (2008). The future of GIS in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74 (2), 161-174.
15. Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72 (3), 173-183.
16. Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic Information Science: New geovisualization technologies-emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research. Progress in Human Geography, 53, 256-263.
17. Elwood, S., & Ghose, R. (2004). PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica, 38 (3/4), 19-33.
18. Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42 (1), 6-15.
19. Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72 (3), 137-148.
20. Ganapati, S. (2010). Using geographic information systems to increase citizen engagement (pp. 1-46). Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
21. Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems applications in E-government. Public Administration Review, 71 (3), 425-434.
22. Geertman, S. (2006). Potentials for planning support: A planning-conceptual approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33, 863-880.
23. Girres, J. F., & Touya, G. (2010). Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14 (4), 435-459.
24. Goelman, A. (2005). Technology in context: Mediating factors in the utilization of planning technologies. Environment and Planning A, 37, 895-907.
25. Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211-221.
26. Goodchild, M., & Glennon, J. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (3), 231-241.
27. Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (4), 682-703.
28. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the Geoweb. Geography Compass, 2 (6), 2011-2039.
29. Hall, G., Chipeniuk, R., Feick, R., Leahy, M., & Deparday, V. (2010). Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (5), 761-781.
30. Harvey, F. (2003). Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government: The role of trust. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 47 (1), 28-36.
31. Harvey, F. (2007). Just another private-public partnership? Possible constraints on scientific information in virtual map browsers. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 761-764.
32. Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., Gibin, M., Milton, R., & Batty, M. (2009). NeoGeography and Web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Services, 3 (2), 118-145.
33. Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2011a). Motivations driving government adoption of the Geoweb. GeoJournal, 1-14. doi:10.1007/s10708-011-9416-8
34. Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2011b). Negotiating constraints to the adoption of agent-based modeling in tourism planning. Environment and Planning B - Planning and Design, 38 (2), 307-321.
35. Johnson, P. A., Sieber, R. E., Magnien, N., & Ariwi, J. (2012). Automated web harvesting to collect and analyse user-generated content for tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 15(3), 293-299.
36. Miller, C. (2007). A beast in the field: The Google maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica, 2 (3), 187-199.
37. Nedovic-Budic, Z. (1998). The impact of GIS technology. Environment and Planning B - Planning and Design, 25 (5), 681-692.
38. Newman, G., Zimmerman, D., Crall, A., Laituri, M., Graham, J., & Stapel, L. (2010). User-friendly web mapping: Lessons from a citizen science website. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (12), 1851-1869.
39. Onsrud, H., & Pinto, J. (1991). Diffusion of geographic information innovations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 5 (4), 447-467.
40. Parsons, J., Lukyanenko, R., & Weirsma, Y. (2011). Easier citizen science is better. Nature, 471 (7336), 37.
41. Pickles, J. (Ed.). (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford.
42. Rouse, J. L., Bergeron, S. J., & Harris, T. M. (2007). Participating in the Geospatial Web: Collaborative mapping, social networks and participatory GIS. In A. Scharl & K. Tochterman (Eds.), The geospatial web: How geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society (pp. 153-158). London: Springer.
43. Saebo, O., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 400-428.
44. Schuurman, N. (2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24 (4), 569-590.
45. Seeger, C. (2008). The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72, 199-213.
46. Sieber, R. (2004). Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica, 39 (1), 25-39.
47. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 491-507.
48. Smith, N. (1993). Homeless/global: Scaling places. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures (pp. 87-119). London: Routledge.
49. Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or 'glocalisation'? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17 (1), 25-48.
50. te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2008). Developing land use and transport PSS: Meaningful information through a dialogue between modelers and planners. Transport Policy, 15, 251-259.
51. te Brömmelstroet, M., & Schrijnen, P. (2010). From planning support systems to mediated planning support: A structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (1), 3-20.
52. Tulloch, D. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72 (3), 161-171.
53. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol: O'Reilly.
54. Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005). Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 37, 909-924.
55. Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2007). A SWOT analysis of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1699-1714.
56. Wittig, M. A., & Schmitz, J. (1996). Electronic grassroots organizing. Journal of Social Issues, 52 (1), 53-69.
57. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the Internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38 (6), 1322-1343.
58. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical and Health Policy, 2 (2), 7-33.