Pain reduction after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy among women with dysmenorrhoea: A randomised controlled trial

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 122, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1102-1111

  Berner, E ^a   Qvigstad, E ^a,b   Myrvold, A K ^a   Lieng, M ^a,b  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cervical stump symptoms; cyclic pelvic pain; dysmenorrhoea; laparoscopic hysterectomy; laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy; patient satisfaction; pelvic pain; quality of life; randomised controlled trial; total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADENOMYOSIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSMENORRHEA; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SUPRACERVICAL HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METRORRHAGIA; NORWAY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIC PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; UTERUS MYOMA; VAGINA BLEEDING; VAGINA DEHISCENCE; VAGINA DISEASE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; DYSMENORRHEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC PAIN; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84932195583     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13362     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 9-16.
2. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Smets M, Polet M, Bassil S,. Laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy: a first series of 500 cases. Gyaecological Endosc 1997; 6: 73-6.
3. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi-Haghpeykar H,. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 167-75.
4. Erian J, Hassan M, Pachydakis A, Chandakas S, Wissa I, Hill N,. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the management of menorrhagia: 400 consecutive cases. BJOG 2008; 115: 742-8.
5. Garry R,. The future of hysterectomy. BJOG 2005; 112: 133-9.
6. Gimbel H, Settnes A, Tabor A,. Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988-1998. A register based trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 267-72.
7. Istre O, Langebrekke A, Qvigstad E,. Changing hysterectomy technique from open abdominal to laparoscopic: new trend in Oslo, Norway. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 74-7.
8. Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY,. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1278-83.
9. Learman LA, Summitt RL Jr, Varner RE, McNeeley SG, Goodman-Gruen D, Richter HE, et al., A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 453-62.
10. Mueller A, Renner SP, Haeberle L, Lermann J, Oppelt P, Beckmann MW, et al., Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) in women with uterine leiomyoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144: 76-9.
11. Nesbitt-Hawes EM, Maley PE, Won HR, Law KS, Zhang CS, Lyons SD, et al., Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy: evidence and techniques. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 424-34.
12. Berner E, Qvigstad E, Langebrekke A, Lieng M,. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy performed with and without excision of the endocervix: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 368-75.
13. Kisic-Trope J, Qvigstad E, Ballard K,. A randomized trial of day-case vs inpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 307-8.
14. Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Ballard K,. Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG 2008; 115: 1605-10.
15. Einarsson JI, Suzuki Y, Vellinga TT, Jonsdottir GM, Magnusson MK, Maurer R, et al., Prospective evaluation of quality of life in total versus supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 617-21.
16. Grosse-Drieling D, Schlutius JC, Altgassen C, Kelling K, Theben J,. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH), a retrospective study of 1,584 cases regarding intra- and perioperative complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285: 1391-6.
17. Hobson DT, Imudia AN, Al-Safi ZA, Shade G, Kruger M, Diamond MP, et al., Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285: 1353-61.
18. Lyons T,. Laparoscopic supracervical versus total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 275-7.
19. Mettler L, Ahmed-Ebbiary N, Schollmeyer T,. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: challenges and limitations. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2005; 14: 145-59.
20. Song X, Waters HC, Pan K, Subramanian D, Sedgley RC, Raff GJ,. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. JSLS 2011; 15: 460-70.
21. Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Rothmund R, Kasperkowiak A, Auwarter G, Ganz A, et al., Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 288: 1329-39.
22. Theben JU, Schellong AR, Altgassen C, Kelling K, Schneider S, Grosse-Drieling D,. Unexpected malignancies after laparoscopic-assisted supracervical hysterectomies (LASH): an analysis of 1,584 LASH cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 455-62.
23. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1156-8.
24. AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 1-3.
25. Berner E, Qvigstad E, Myrvold AK, Lieng M,. Pelvic Pain and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy: Prospective Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 406-11.
26. [ www.aagl.org/aaglnews/new-aagl-tissue-extraction-task-force-report/ ]. Accessed 9 May 2014.
27. [ www.esge.org/article/218 ]. Accessed 9 May 2014.
28. [ www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm393576.htm ]. Accessed 30 April 2014.
29. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J,. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG 2009; 116: 492-500.
30. Ghomi A, Hantes J, Lotze EC,. Incidence of cyclical bleeding after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 201-5.
31. Okaro EO, Jones KD, Sutton C,. Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG 2001; 108: 1017-20.
32. Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L,. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 417-22.
33. Nisolle M, Donnez J,. Subtotal hysterectomy in patients with endometriosis-an option. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 1185-7.
34. [ https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/ ]. Accessed 24 March 2014.
35. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 817-21.
36. Adamson GD,. Endometriosis Fertility Index: is it better than the present staging systems? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25: 186-92.
37. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al., The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10-7.
38. Haas D, Chvatal R, Habelsberger A, Wurm P, Schimetta W, Oppelt P,. Comparison of revised American Fertility Society and ENZIAN staging: a critical evaluation of classifications of endometriosis on the basis of our patient population. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1574-8.
39. [ www.randomization.com/ ]. Accessed 24 March 2014.
40. [ www.sf-36.org/ ]. Accessed 24 March 2014.
41. Garcia L, Isaacson K,. Adenomyosis: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 428-37.
42. Bergeron C, Amant F, Ferenczy A,. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20: 511-21.
43. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al., CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869.
44. Schuster MW, Wheeler TL, Richter HE,. Endometriosis after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with uterine morcellation: a case control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19: 183-7.
45. Thakar R, Ayers S, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I,. Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1318-25.
46. Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Gluud C, Tabor A,. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. BJOG 2003; 110: 1088-98.
47. Morelli M, Noia R, Chiodo D, Mocciaro R, Costantino A, Caruso MT, et al., Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a prospective randomized study. Minerva Ginecol 2007; 59: 1-10.
48. Flory N, Bissonnette F, Amsel RT, Binik YM,. The psychosocial outcomes of total and subtotal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 483-91.
49. Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, et al., EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1-154.
50. Ellstrom MA, Astrom M, Moller A, Olsson JH, Hahlin M,. A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 871-5.
51. Gorlero F, Lijoi D, Biamonti M, Lorenzi P, Pulle A, Dellacasa I, et al., Hysterectomy and women satisfaction: total versus subtotal technique. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 278: 405-10.
52. Persson P, Brynhildsen J, Kjolhede P,. Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long-term follow-up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG 2013; 120: 1556-65.
53. Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R,. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 4: CD004993.
54. Thakar R, Ayers S, Srivastava R, Manyonda I,. Removing the cervix at hysterectomy: an unnecessary intervention? Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1262-9.