Highly consistent effects of plant litter identity and functional traits on decomposition across a latitudinal gradient

Ecology Letters

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1033-1041

  Makkonen, Marika ^a   Berg, Matty P ^a   Handa, I Tanya ^b,c   Hättenschwiler, Stephan ^b   van Ruijven, Jasper ^d   van Bodegom, Peter M ^a   Aerts, Rien ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Food web structure; Litter chemical traits; Litter decomposition; Litter identity; Litter physical traits; Reciprocal litter transplant; Resource quality; Soil fauna

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931749100     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01826.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aerts, R. (1997). Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos, 79, 439-449.
2. Ayres, E., Steltzer, H., Simmons, B., Simpson, R., Steinweg, M., Wallenstein, M. et al. (2009). Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 606-610.
3. Berg, B., Berg, M.P., Bottner, P., Box, E., Breymeyer, A., Anta, R.C.d. et al. (1993). Litter mass loss in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry, 20, 127-153.
4. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (ver. 4.5). Microcomputer Power, New York.
5. Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P.M., Kleinen, T., Wirth, C., Cornwell, W.K., Cornelissen, J.H.C. et al. (2012). Plant-driven variation in decomposition rates improves projections of global litter stock distribution. Biogeosciences, 9, 565-576.
6. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Cadish, G. & Giller, K.E.(eds.) (1997). Driven by Nature, Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. CAB international, Wallingford.
8. Chapin, F.S. III, McFarland, J., McGuire, A.D., Euskirchen, E.S., Ruess, R.W. & Kielland, K. (2009). The changing global carbon cycle: linking plant-soil carbon dynamics to global consequences. J. Ecol., 97, 840-850.
9. Coq, S., Souquet, J.-M., Meudec, E., Cheynier, V. & Hättenschwiler, S. (2010). Interspecific variation in leaf litter tannins drives decomposition in a tropical rain forest of French Guiana. Ecology, 91, 2080-2091.
10. Cornelissen, J.H.C. (1996). An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. J. Ecol., 84, 573-582.
11. Cornelissen, J.H.C. & Thompson, K. (1997). Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytol., 135, 109-114.
12. Cornelissen, J.H.C., Perez-Harguindeguy, N., Diaz, S., Grime, J.P., Marzano, B., Cabido, M. et al. (1999). Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents. New Phytol., 143, 191-200.
13. Cornwell, W.K., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V.T., Godoy, O. et al. (2008). Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol. Lett., 11, 1065-1071.
14. Coulis, M., Hättenschwiler, S., Rapior, S. & Coq, S. (2009). The fate of condensed tannins during litter consumption by soil animals. Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 2573-2578.
15. Currie, W.S., Harmon, M.E., Burke, I.C., Hart, S.C., Parton, W.J. & Silver, W. (2009). Cross-biome transplants of plant litter show decomposition models extend to a broader climatic range but lose predictability at the decadal time scale. Global Change Biol., 16, 1744-1761.
16. David, J.-F. & Handa, I.T. (2010). The ecology of saprophagous macroarthropods (millipedes, woodlice) in the context of global change. Biol. Rev., 85, 881-895.
17. De Oliveira, T., Hättenschwiler, S. & Handa, I.T. (2010). Snail and millipede complementarity in decomposing Mediterranean forest leaf litter mixtures. Funct. Ecol., 24, 937-946.
18. Edwards, C.A. & Bohlen, P.J. (1995). Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. Chapman and Hall, London.
19. Freschet, G.T., Dias, A.T.C., Ackerly, D.D., Aerts, R., van Bodegom, P.M., Cornwell, W.K. et al. (2011). Global to community scale differences in the prevalence of convergent over divergent leaf trait distributions in plant assemblages. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 755-765.
20. Gholz, H.L., Wedin, D.A., Smitherman, S.M., Harmon, M.E. & Parton, W.J. (2000). Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Global Change Biol., 6, 751-765.
21. Giller, P.S. (1996). The diversity of soil communities, the 'poor man's tropical rainforest'. Biodivers. Conserv., 5, 135-168.
22. Hassall, M., Turner, J.G. & Rands, M.R.W. (1987). Effects of terrestrial isopods on the decomposition of woodland leaf litter. Oecologia, 72, 597-604.
23. Hättenschwiler, S. & Gasser, P. (2005). Soil animals alter plant litter diversity effects on decomposition. PNAS, 102, 1519-1524.
24. Hättenschwiler, S., Coq, S., Barantal, S. & Handa, I.T. (2011). Leaf traits and decomposition in tropical rainforests: revisiting some commonly held views and towards a new hypothesis. New Phytol., 189, 950-965.
25. Heemsbergen, D.A., Berg, M.P., Loreau, M., van Hal, J.R., Faber, J.H. & Verhoef, H.A. (2004). Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science, 306, 1019-1020.
26. Hunt, H.W., Ingham, E.R., Coleman, D.C., Elliott, E.T. & Reid, C.P.P. (1988). Nitrogen limitation of production and decomposition in prairie, mountain meadow, and pine forest. Ecology, 69, 1009-1016.
27. Hurvich, C.M. & Tsai, C.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76, 297-307.
28. Kaspari, M., Yanoviak, S.P., Dudley, R., Yuan, M. & Clay, N.A. (2009). Sodium shortage as a constraint on the carbon cycle in an inland tropical rainforest. PNAS, 106, 19405-19409.
29. Kraus, T.E.C., Dahlgren, R.A. & Zasoski, R.J. (2003). Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems - a review. Plant Soil, 256, 41-66.
30. Milcu, A., Partsch, S., Scherber, C., Weisser, W.W. & Scheu, S. (2008). Earthworms and legumes control litter decomposition in a plant diversity gardient. Ecology, 89, 1872-1882.
31. National Research Council (2005). Mineral Tolerance of Animals, 2nd rev. edn. National Academic Press, Washington.
32. Nicolai, V. (1988). Phenolic and mineral content of leaves influences decomposition in European forest ecosystems. Oecologia, 75, 575-579.
33. Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Cornelissen, J., Vendramini, F., Cabido, M. & Castellanos, A. (2000). Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant Soil, 218, 21-30.
34. Powers, J.S., Montgomery, R.A., Adair, E.C., Brearley, F.Q., DeWalt, S.J., Castanho, C.T. et al. (2009). Decomposition in tropical forests: a pan-tropical study of the effects of litter type, litter placement and mesofaunal exclusion across a precipitation gradient. J. Ecol., 97, 801-811.
35. Santiago, L.S. (2007). Extending the leaf economics spectrum to decomposition: evidence from a tropical forest. Ecology, 88, 1126-1131.
36. Smith, V.C. & Bradford, M.A. (2003). Litter quality impacts on grassland litter decomposition are differently dependent on soil fauna across time. Appl. Soil Ecol., 24, 197-203.
37. Swift, M.J., Heal, O.W. & Anderson, J.M. (1979). Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
38. Trofymow, J.A., Moore, T.R., Titus, B., Prescott, C., Morrison, I., Siltanen, M. et al. (2002). Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate. Can. J. For. Res., 32, 789-804.
39. Vaieretti, M., Pérez Harguindeguy, N., Gurvich, D., Cingolani, A. & Cabido, M. (2005). Decomposition dynamics and physico-chemical leaf quality of abundant species in a montane woodland in central Argentina. Plant Soil, 278, 223-234.
40. Vos, V.C.A., van Ruijven, J., Berg, M.P., Peeters, E.T.H.M. & Berendse, F. (2011). Macro-detritivore identity drives leaf litter diversity effects. Oikos, 120, 1092-1098.
41. Wall, D.H., Bradford, M.A., St. John, M.G., Trofymow, J.A., Behan-Pelletier, V., Bignell, D.E. et al. (2008). Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent. Global Change Biol., 14, 2661-2677.
42. Wardle, D.A. & Lavelle, P. (1997). Linkages between soil biota, plant litter quality and decomposition. In: Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition (eds Cadish, G. & Giller, K.E.). CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 107-124.
43. Zhang, D., Hui, D., Luo, Y. & Zhou, G. (2008). Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J. Plant Ecol., 1, 85-93.
44. Zhou, G., Guan, L., Wei, X., Tang, X., Liu, S., Liu, J. et al. (2008). Factors influencing leaf litter decomposition: an intersite decomposition experiment across China. Plant Soil, 311, 61-72.
45. Zimmer, M. (2002). Nutrition in terrestrial isopods (Isopoda: Oniscidea): an evolutionary-ecological approach. Biol. Rev., 77, 455-493.