A Systematic Review of Research Guidelines in Decision-Analytic Modeling

Value in Health

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 512-529

  Peñaloza Ramos, Maria Cristina ^a   Barton, Pelham ^a   Jowett, Sue ^a   Sutton, Andrew John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

decision analytic modeling; good practice; guidelines; methods; modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COCHRANE LIBRARY; DECISION ANALYTIC MODELING; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMBASE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDLINE; MODEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; SOCIAL CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; STANDARDS;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84931576492     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.014     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. M.F. Drummond, M.J. Sculpher, G.W. Torrance. et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes 3rd ed. 2005 Oxford University Press Oxford
2. S. Petrou, and A. Gray Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting BMJ 342 2011 d1766
3. Jowett S. Using Decision Analytical Modelling Techniques in Health Economics: An Application to Screening for and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation [thesis]. University of Birmingham, 2007.
4. A.H. Briggs, K. Claxton, and M.J. Sculpher Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation: Handbooks in Health Economic Evaluation 2006 Oxford University Press Oxford
5. Z. Philips, L. Ginnelly, M. Sculpher, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment Health Technol Assess 8 2004 1 158
6. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies (3rd ed.). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA), 2006.
7. J. Earnshaw, and G. Lewis NICE guide to the methods of technology appraisal: pharmaceutical industry perspective Pharmacoeconomics 26 2008 725 727
8. J. Karnon, A. Brennan, and R. Akehurst A critique and impact analysis of decision modeling assumptions Med Decis Making 27 2007 491 499
9. Z. Philips, L. Bojke, M. Schulpher, et al. Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment Pharmacoeconomics 24 2006 355 371
10. M. Sculpher, E. Fenwick, and K. Claxton Assessing quality in decision analytic cost-effectiveness models: a suggested framework and example of application Pharmacoeconomics 17 2000 461 477
11. F.A. Sonnenberg, M.S. Roberts, J. Tsevat, et al. Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models Med Care 32 7, Suppl. 1994 JS52 JS64
12. J. Soto Health economic evaluations using decision analytic modeling: principles and practices - utilization of a checklist to their development and appraisal Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18 2002 94 111
13. M.C. Weinstein, B. O'Brien, J. Hornberger, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices - modeling studies Value Health 6 2003 9 17
14. A.H. Briggs, M.C. Weinstein, E.A.L. Fenwick, et al. Model parameter estimation and uncertainty: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6 Value Health 15 2012 835 842
15. J.J. Caro, A.H. Briggs, U. Siebert, et al. Modeling good research practices - overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 Value Health 15 2012 796 803
16. D.M. Eddy, W. Hollingworth, J.J. Caro, et al. Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 Value Health 15 2012 843 850
17. J. Karnon, J. Stahl, A. Brennan, et al. Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4 Value Health 15 2012 821 827
18. R. Pitman, D. Fisman, G.S. Zaric, et al. Dynamic transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-5 Value Health 15 2012 828 834
19. M. Roberts, L.B. Russell, A.D. Paltiel, et al. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2 Value Health 15 2012 804 811
20. U. Siebert, O. Alagoz, A.M. Bayoumi, et al. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3 Value Health 15 2012 812 820
21. P. Barton, S. Bryan, and S. Robinson Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach J Health Serv Res Policy 9 2004 110 118
22. T.G. Bentley, K.M. Kuntz, and J.S. Ringel Bias associated with failing to incorporate dependence on event history in Markov models Med Decis Making 30 2010 651 660
23. A. Brennan, S.E. Chick, and R. Davies A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies Health Econ 15 2006 1295 1310
24. J. Karnon Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation Health Econ 12 2003 837 848
25. L. Andronis, P. Barton, and S. Bryan Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making Health Technol Asses 13 2009 1 61
26. J. Bilcke, P. Beutels, M. Brisson, and M. Jit Accounting for methodological, structural, and parameter uncertainty in decision-analytic models: a practical guide Med Decis Making 31 2011 675 692
27. L. Bojke, K. Claxton, M. Sculpher, and S. Palmer Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: a review and application of methods Value Health 12 2009 739 749
28. A.H. Briggs, A.E. Ades, and M.J. Price Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for decision trees with multiple branches: use of the Dirichlet distribution in a Bayesian framework Med Decis Making 23 2003 341 350
29. A.H. Briggs, and A.M. Gray Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions Health Technol Assess 3 1999 1 128
30. C.H. Jackson, L. Bojke, S.G. Thompson, et al. A framework for addressing structural uncertainty in decision models Med Decis Making 31 2011 662 674
31. R. Jain, M. Grabner, and E. Onukwugha Sensitivity analysis in cost-effectiveness studies: from guidelines to practice Pharmacoeconomics 29 2011 2011
32. B. Groot Koerkamp, T. Stijnen, and M.C. Weinstein Hunink MGM. The combined analysis of uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in medical decision models Med Decis Making 31 2011 650 661
33. K.M. Kuntz, and S.J. Goldie Assessing the sensitivity of decision-analytic results to unobserved markers of risk: defining the effects of heterogeneity bias Med Decis Making 22 2002 218 227
34. P. Sendi, A. Gafni, and S. Birch Opportunity costs and uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care interventions Health Econ 11 2002 23 31
35. M. Strong, J.E. Oakley, and J. Chilcott Managing structural uncertainty in health economic decision models: a discrepancy approach J Royal Stat Soc Series C (Appl Stat) 61 2012 25 45
36. J.D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, N.K. Stout, and S.J. Goldie Empirically evaluating decision-analytic models Value Health 13 2010 667 674
37. J. Karnon, and T. Vanni Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness of fit, parameter search strategies and convergence criteria Pharmacoeconomics 29 2011 51 62
38. L.G. Kim, and S.G. Thompson Uncertainty and validation of health economic decision models Health Econ 19 2010 43 55