Critical Components of Uncertainty Communication in Life Cycle Assessments of Emerging Technologies: Nanotechnology as a Case Study

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 468-479

  Gavankar, Sheetal ^a   Anderson, Sarah ^a   Keller, Arturo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication of science; Emerging technology; Industrial ecology; Nanotechnology; Uncertainty; Uncertainty communication

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; LIFE CYCLE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CRITICAL COMPONENT; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); PUBLIC OPINIONS; TECHNICAL ASPECTS; UNCERTAINTY;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84931566884     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12183     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Arora, P. 2011. Life cycle assessment-From birth till death & closing the loop. http://linkingsustainability.com/2011/02/17/pinning-down-the-high-impacts-lca/. Accessed 12 December 2013.
2. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). 2009. Fuel emissions focus 'too narrow'. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8089722.stm. Accessed 12 December 2013.
3. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). 2012. Electric cars 'pose environmental threat'. BBC News, 4 October, section. www.bbc.com/news/business-19830232. Accessed 12 December 2013.
4. Brossard, D. and D. A. Scheufele . 2013. Science, new media, and the public. Science 339(6115): 40-41.
5. Casman, E. A., M. G. Morgan, and H. Dowlatabadi . 1999. Mixed levels of uncertainty in complex policy models. Risk Analysis 19(1): 33-42.
6. Chester, M. and A. Horvath . 2010. Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: The case of California. Environmental Research Letters 5(1): 014003.
7. Chester, M. V. and A. Horvath . 2009. Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environmental Research Letters 4(2): 024008.
8. Ciroth, A., G. Fleischer, and J. Steinbach . 2004. Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(4): 216-226.
9. Dankel, D. J., R. Aps, G. Padda, C. Rockmann, J. P. van der Sluijs, D. C. Wilson, and P. Degnbol . 2011. Advice under uncertainty in the marine system. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69(1): 3-7.
10. Doble, J. 1995. Public opinion about issues characterized by technological complexity and scientific uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science 4(2): 95-118.
11. EC (European Commission). 2004. European research: A guide to successful communications. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
12. Frewer, L. 2004. The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters 149(1-3): 391-397.
13. Frewer, L. and B. Salter . 2002. Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: the case of BSE. Science and Public Policy 29(2): 137-145.
14. Friedman, S. M., S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, eds. 1999. Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Lea's communication series. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
15. Frischknecht, R., N. Jungbluth, H.-J. Althaus, G. Doka, R. Dones, T. Heck, S. Hellweg, et al. 2004. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(1): 3-9.
16. Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz . 1990. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Gavankar, S., S. Suh, and A. A. Keller . 2012. Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: Review and recommendations. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(3): 295-303.
18. Gavankar, S., S. Suh, and A. Keller . 2014. The role of scale and technology maturity in life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: A case study on carbon nanotubes. Journal of Industrial Ecology DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12175.
19. Giles, J. 2002. Scientific uncertainty: When doubt is a sure thing. Nature 418(6897): 476-478.
20. Grieger, K. D., S. F. Hansen, and A. Baun . 2009. The known unknowns of nanomaterials: Describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks. Nanotoxicology 3(3): 222-233.
21. Guardian . 2010. Can the train take the strain? The Guardian, 12 January, section. www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jan/12/high-speed-train-impact. Accessed 12 December 2013.
22. Guardian . 2012. Are electric cars bad for the environment? The Guardian, 5 October, section. www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2012/oct/05/electric-cars-emissions-bad-environment. Accessed 12 December 2013.
23. Guinée, J. B. 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Hawkins, T. R., B. Singh, G. Majeau-Bettez, and A. H. Strømman . 2013. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology 17(1): 53-64.
25. Heinze, L. 2013. A green hybrid fling. www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/4723367-a-green-hybrid-fling. Accessed 12 December 2013.
26. Henriksson, P. J. G., J. B. Guinée, R. Heijungs, A. Koning, and D. M. Green . 2013. A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data-Including estimates for uncertainty. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19(2): 429-436.
27. Hischier, R. and T. Walser . 2012. Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: State of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. Science of the Total Environment 425: 271-282.
28. Höjer, M., S. Ahlroth, K.-H. Dreborg, T. Ekvall, G. Finnveden, O. Hjelm, E. Hochschorner, M. Nilsson, and V. Palm . 2008. Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(18): 1958-1970.
29. Huijbregts, M. A. J. 1998a. Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(6): 343-351.
30. Huijbregts, M. A. J. 1998b. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(5): 273-280.
31. Huijbregts, M. A. J., G. Norris, R. Bretz, A. Ciroth, B. Maurice, B. Bahr, B. Weidema, and A. S. H. Beaufort . 2001. Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6(3): 127-132.
32. ICMM (International Council of Mining and Materials). 2007. Metals environmental risk assessment guidance (MERAG)-07: Uncertainty analysis. London: International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM) and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
33. Inquirer. 2007. Hidden cost of driving a Prius. Philadelphia Inquirer, 4 April, section. http://articles.philly.com/2007-04-04/news/25242308_1_battery-plant-sudbury-fuel-efficiency. Accessed 12 December 2013.
34. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2010. Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
35. Jandl, R., M. Rodeghiero, and M. Olsson . 2011. Soil carbon in sensitive European ecosystems: From science to land management. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell Chichester, UK: John Wiley (distributor).
36. Keller, A. A., S. McFerran, A. Lazareva, and S. Suh . 2013. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 15(6): 1-17.
37. Kuhn, K. M. 2000. Message format and audience values: Interactive effects of uncertainty information and environmental attitudes on perceived risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20(1): 41-51.
38. Lenzen, M. 2005. Uncertainty in impact and externality assessments-Implications for decision-making. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(3): 189-199.
39. Lloyd, S. M. and R. Ries . 2008. Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: A survey of quantitative approaches. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 161-179.
40. Lowe, J. 2013. Life cycle analysis of biofuels shows mixed results. http://impact_analysis.blogspot.com/2006/07/life-cycle-analysis-of-biofuels-shows.html. Accessed 12 December 2013.
41. Maxim, L. and J. P. van der Sluijs . 2011. Quality in environmental science for policy: Assessing uncertainty as a component of policy analysis. Environmental Science & Policy 14(4): 482-492.
42. Miles, S. and L. J. Frewer . 2003. Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards. Journal of Risk Research 6(3): 267-283.
43. Mirabella, N., V. Castellani, and S. Sala . 2013. Life cycle assessment of bio-based products: A disposable diaper case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(5): 1036-1047.
44. Mitra, K., M. C. Reiss, and L. M. Capella . 1999. An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services. Journal of Services Marketing 13(3): 208-228.
45. Morgan, M. G. 1998. Uncertainty analysis in risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4(1): 25-39.
46. Morgan, M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and C. J. Atman . 2001. Risk communication: A mental model approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Moss, R. and S. Schneider . 2000. Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
48. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2006. Science and engineering indicators 2006, edited by National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA, USA: National Science Foundation.
49. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2012. Science and engineering indicators 2012, edited by National Science Foundation. Arlingwon, VA, USA: National Science Foundation.
50. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2002-12. Science and engineering indicators 2002-12, edited by National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA, USA: National Science Foundation.
51. NYT (The New York Times). 2009. How green is rail travel? The New York Times, 12 August, section. http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/12/how-green-is-rail-travel/. Accessed 22 August 2013.
52. Painter, J. and C. Bundy . 2010. Summoned by science: Reporting climate change at Copenhagen and beyond. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
53. Pellechia, M. G. 1997. Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science 6(1): 49-68.
54. Peterson, R. A. and M. C. Merino . 2003. Consumer information search behavior and the internet. Psychology and Marketing 20(2): 99-121.
55. Pidgeon, N. 2008. Risk, uncertainty and social controversy: From risk perception and communication to public engagement. In Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives, edited by G. Bammer and M. Smithson . London: Earthscan Risk in Society Series.
56. Pidgeon, N., B. Harthorn, and T. Satterfield . 2011. Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: Emerging technologies, emerging challenges. Risk Analysis 31(11): 1694-1700.
57. Post, T. W. 2007. More than meets the eye-Paper or plastic? www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/10/03/GR2007100301385.html? Accessed 22 August 2013.
58. Refsgaard, J. C., J. P. van der Sluijs, A. L. Højberg, and P. A. Vanrolleghem . 2007. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(11): 1543-1556.
59. Reuters. 2007. Swiss name Toyota's Prius the world's greenest car. The Reuters, 27 July, section. www.reuters.com/article/2007/07/27/us-cars-pollution-idUSL2733658020070727. Accessed 22 August 2013.
60. Rosqvist, T. 2003. On the use of expert judgement in the qualification of risk assessment. Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland.
61. Satterfield, T., J. Conti, B. H. Harthorn, N. Pidgeon, and A. Pitts . 2013. Understanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologies. Science and Public Policy 40(2): 247-260.
62. Scheufele, D. A. and B. V. Lewenstein . 2005. The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7(6): 659-667.
63. Scheufele, D. A. and D. Tewksbury . 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57(1): 9-20.
64. Scheufele, D. A. and M. C. Nisbet . 2007. Framing. In Encyclopedia of political communication, edited by L. L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha . Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
65. Schwark, S. 2012. The endgame for biofuels in Germany? Dusseldorf, Germany:Hill & Knowlton.
66. SIRC-ASCoR (Social Issues Research Center and Amsterdam School of Communications Research). 2011. Guidelines for scientists on communicating with the media. Brussels: European Commission.
67. Spinella, A. 2007. Dust to dust: The energy cost of new vehicles from concept to disposal, the non-technical report. Brandon, OR, USA: CNW marketing Research, Inc.
68. Suleski, J. and M. Ibaraki . 2009. Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media. Public Understanding of Science 19(1): 115-125.
69. Taylor, T. 2013. Electric vs. conventional cars on conservation. Conversable Economist (blog), 15 March. http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2013/03/electric-vs-conventional-cars-on.html.
70. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2011. Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases: A basis for greener processes and products. Shonan, Japan: United Nations Environment Programme.
71. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Guidance on the development, evaluation and application of regulatory environmental models. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
72. Van Zelm, R. and M. A. J. Huijbregts . 2013. Quantifying the trade-off between parameter and model structure uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 47(16): 9274-9280.
73. Walker, W. E., P. Harremoës, J. Rotmans, J. P. van der Sluijs, M. B. A. van Asselt, P. Janssen, and M. P. Krayer von Krauss . 2003. Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment 4(1): 5-17.
74. Walser, T., E. Demou, D. J. Lang, and S. Hellweg . 2011. Prospective environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver T-shirts. Environmental Science & Technology 45(10): 4570-4578.
75. Weidema, B. P. 2000. Increasing credibility of LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5(2): 63-64.
76. Weidema, B. P. and M. S. Wesnæs . 1996. Data quality management for life cycle inventories-An example of using data quality indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3-4): 167-174.
77. Weisbrod, A. V. and G. Hoof . 2011. LCA-measured environmental improvements in Pampers® diapers. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(2): 145-153.
78. Weiss, C. 2003. Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law, Probability and Risk 2(1): 25-46.
79. Weitkamp, E. 2003. British newspapers privilege health and medicine topics over other science news. Public Relations Review 29(3): 321-333.
80. Williams, E. D., C. L. Weber, and T. R. Hawkins . 2009. Hybrid framework for managing uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(6): 928-944.
81. Wilsdon, J. 2004. The politics of small things: Nanotechnology, risk, and uncertainty. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 23(4): 16-21.
82. WSJ (Wall Street Journal). 2013. Green cars have a dirty little secret. The Wall Street Journal, 11 March, section. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324128504578346913994914472.html. Accessed 22 August 2013.
83. Zehr, S. C. 2000. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science 9(2): 85-104.