WTO dispute settlement practice 1995–2005: Lessons from the past and future challenges

The WTO in the Twenty-First Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 38-97

  Petersmann, Ernst Ulrich ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931466821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139162067.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement (The Hague, 1997).
2. United States Congress in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (ed.), Reforming the World Trading System. Legitimacy, Efficiency, Democratic Governance (Oxford, 2005).
3. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (London, The Hague, 1997)
4. Federico Ortino and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague, 2004).
5. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Mark Pollack (eds), Transatlantic Economic Disputes. The EU, the United States and the WTO (Oxford, 2003)
6. Julio Lacarte and Jaime Granados (eds), Inter-Governmental Dispute Settlement: Multilateral and Regional Approaches (London, 2004)
7. Locknie Hsu, ‘Dispute Settlement Systems in Recent Free Trade Agreements of Singapore’ (2003) 4 Journal ofWorld Investment, 277–314.
8. Frieder Roessler, ‘Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries under the WTO Dispute Settlement System’, in Ortino and Petersmann, WTO Dispute Settlement System, pp. 87–90.
9. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘Multilevel Trade Governance in the WTO Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism’, in Christian Joerges and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (eds), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Oxford, 2006), chapter 1.
10. Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the WTO’, in Ortino and Petersmann, WTO Dispute Settlement System, pp. 499 and 527.
11. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘From “member-driven governance” to constitutionally limited “multilevel trade governance” in the WTO’, in Giorgio Sacerdoti, Alan Yanovich, and Jan Bohanes (eds), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System (Cambridge, 2006), chapter 7.
12. Henrik Horn and Joseph Weiler, ‘European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and its Discontent’, in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The WTO Case Law of 2002 (Washington, 2005), pp. 248–275.
13. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘The WTO Dispute over Genetically Modified Organisms: Interface Problems of International Trade Law, Environmental and Biotechnology Law’, in Francesco Francioni and Tullio Scovazzi (eds), Biotechnology and International Law (Oxford, 2006), pp. 173–200.
14. James Harrison, ‘Incentives for Development: The EC's Generalized System of Preferences, India'sWTO Challenge and Reform’ (2005) 42 CommonMarket Law Review, 1663–1689.
15. Amartya Sen, Rationality and Freedom (Cambridge, Mass., 2002).
16. Friedrich A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (London, 1960), p. 35.
17. Joost Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. How WTO Rules Relate to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge, 2003).
18. Joel Trachtman (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law, 855–861
19. Gabrielle Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law, 753–814.
20. Richard Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass., 1978).
21. Götz J. Göttsche, Die Anwendung von Rechtsprinzipien in der Spruchpraxis der WTO-Rechtsmittelinstanz (Berlin, 2005).
22. Robert Alexy, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford, 2002), chapter 3.
23. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘The Human Rights Approach Advocated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and by the ILO: Is It Relevant for WTO Law and Policy?’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law, 605–627.
24. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘Trade and Human Rights I’, and Sheldon Leader, ‘Trade and Human Rights II’, in Patrick F. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton, and Michael G. Plummer (eds), The WTO: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (Berlin, 2005), Vol. I, pp. 623–696.
25. Lorand Bartels, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice on Article XXIV GATT’, in Ortino and Petersmann (eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System, pp. 263–273.
26. Emanuel Opuku Awuku, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice and Trade-Related Environmental Measures’, in Ortino and Petersmann, WTO Dispute Settlement System, pp. 341–352.
27. Joel P. Trachtman, ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution’ (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal, 333, 342.
28. Trachtman (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law, 855–861.
29. Joost Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. How WTO Rules Relate to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 125–126.
30. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘Theories of Justice, Human Rights and the Constitution of International Markets’ (2003) 37 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 407–460.
31. Klaus Dicke, ‘The Founding Function of Human Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, in David Kretzmer and Eckhardt Klein (eds), The Concept of Human Dignity (The Hague, 2002), pp. 111–120.
32. Christopher Brown, ‘Annotation of the Schmidberger case’ (2003) Common Market Law Review, 1499–1512, 1504.
33. Tomas Cottier, Joost Pauwelyn, and Lisa Bürgi (eds), Human Rights and International Trade (Oxford, 2005).
34. Sabrina Safrin, ‘Hyperownership in a Time of Biotechnological Promise: The International Conflict to Control the Building Blocks of Life’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law, 641–685.
35. Veiko Heiskanen, ‘The Regulatory Philosophy of International Trade Law’ (2004) 38 Journal ofWorld Trade, 1–36, 25–29 and 33.
36. Allan Rosas, ‘The Legal Sources of EU Fundamental Rights: A Systemic Overview’, in Nicolas Colneric et al. (eds), Une Communauté de Droit. Festschrift für G.C.R. Iglesias (Berlin, 2003).
37. Donna Gomien, David Harris, and Leo Zwaak, Law and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter (Strasbourg, 1996), pp. 211–219.
38. Friedl Weiss, ‘Inherent Powers of National and International Courts’, in Ortino and Petersmann, WTO Dispute Settlement System, pp. 177–190.
39. Frieder Roessler, ‘The Institutional Balance between the Judicial and the Political Organs of the WTO’, in Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds), New Directions in International Economic Law. Essays in Honour of Professor John H. Jackson (The Hague, 2000), pp. 325–346.
40. Lorand Bartels, ‘The Separation of Powers in the WTO: How to Avoid Judicial Activism’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 861–890.
41. Richard H. Steinberg, ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional and Political Constraints’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law, 247–265.
42. John P. Kelly, ‘Judicial Activism in the WTO: Developing Principles of Self-Restraint’ (2002) 22 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 353–380.
43. World Trade Organization, A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System (Geneva, 2004), pp. 170–178.
44. Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation (Ann Arbor, 2003).
45. John H. Jackson and Alan Sykes (eds), Implementing the Uruguay Round (The Hague, 1997)
46. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ‘On Reinforcing WTO Rules in Domestic Laws’, in John J. Barcelo III and Hugh Corbett (eds), Rethinking the World Trading System (Lexington, 2006), chapter 11.
47. Miguel P. Maduro, We the Court – the European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford, 1998)
48. Renaud Dehousse, The European Court of Justice. The Politics of Judicial Integration (London, 1998).
49. Joseph H.H. Weiler (ed.), The EU, the WTO and NAFTA. Towards a Common Law of International Trade (Oxford, 2000).