Public Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Four Nordic Countries: Harmony of Goals and Conflict of Means

Business and Society

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 464-500

  Midttun, Atle ^a   Gjølberg, Maria ^b   Kourula, Arno ^c   Sweet, Susanne ^d   Vallentin, Steen ^e  

^a BI NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

^e Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

business and political strategies; corporate social responsibility (CSR); politics; regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931461429     PISSN: 00076503     EISSN: 15524205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0007650312450848     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Albareda L.,Lozano J. M.,Ysa T.Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe.Journal of Business Ethics. 2007;74:391-407
2. Andersen S. K.,Mailand M.The role of employers and trade unions in multipartite social partnerships. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Centre; 2002:
3. Bambra C.Decommodification and the worlds of welfare revisited.Journal of European Social Policy. 2006;16 (1): 73-80
4. Bergman A.Co-constitution of domestic and international welfare obligations. The case of Sweden’s social domocratically inspired internationalism.Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association. 2007;42 (1): 73-99
5. Bhattacharya C. B.,Sen S.,Korschum D.Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent.MIT Sloan Management Review. 2008;40 (2): 36-44
6. Danish Government. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.csrgov.dk/sw49167.asp
7. Einhorn E.,Logue J.Modern welfare states. Scandinavian politics and policy in the global age. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2003:
8. Elkington J.Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone; 1999:
9. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Esping-Andersen G., ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity; 1990:
10. European Commission. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/csr/index_en.htm.
11. European Commission. (2006). Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: Making Europe a pole of excellence on corporate social responsibility (COM [2006] 136 final, Brussels). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0136:FIN:en:PDF
12. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility (COM [2011] 681 final, Brussels). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/new-csr/act_en.pdf
13. Factiva. (2011). Factiva database. Retrieved from http://www.dowjones.com/factiva/index.asp
14. National strategy for corporate social responsibility—Action plan for CSR of the German Federal Government. Bonn, Germany: Author; 2010:
15. Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Germany. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.csr-in-deutschland.de/portal/generator/15050/2010__10__06__cabinet__action__plan__for__csr.html.
16. Finnish Government, Ministry of Employment and the Economy. (2008). Government decree on the Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.tem.fi/files/23532/Government_Decree_on_the_Committee_on_Social_and_Corporate_Responsibility_pdf
17. Finnish Government, Ministry of Employment and the Economy. (2012). Corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.tem.fi/index.phtml?l=en&s=888
18. Fombrun C.Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1996:
19. Fox T.,Ward H.,Howard B.Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study. Washington, DC: World Bank Publication; 2002:
20. Freeman E. R.Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman; 1984:
21. Friedman M.The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.The New York Times Magazine. 1970;:122-126
22. Glaser B. G.,Strauss A. L.The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1967:
23. Global Reporting Initiative. (2010). Global reporting initiative. Year in review 2009/2010. Retrieved from http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/E8B6ED9E-1A29-4154-A6DA-F14E6F71A2C9/3830/GRI_Year_In_Review_241209.pdf
24. Hall P. A.,Soskice D.Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Hall P. A.Soskice D., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:1-68.
25. Jackson G.,Apostolakou A.Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: CSR as an institutional mirror or a substitute?.Journal of Business Ethics. 2010;94 (3): 371-394
26. Joly C.,Olsen P. I.The Nordic model: Is it sustainable and exportable. Midttun A.Witoszek N., ed. Oslo, Norway: CERES21 Report; 2011:8-11.
27. Idowu S. O.,Leal Filho W.Global practices of corporate social responsibility. New York, NY/Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2009:
28. Kanter R.From spare change to real change.Harvard Business Review. 1999;77 (3): 122-132
29. Keane J.Civil society in the age of wikileaks. Trägårdh L.Witoszek N.Taylor B., ed. Oxford, UK: Berghan Books; 2012:15-32.
30. Kenworthy l.Quantitative indicators of corporatism.International Journal of Sociology. 2003;33 (3): 10-44
31. Kinderman D.Why do some countries get CSR sooner, and in greater quantity than others? The political economy of corporate responsibility and the rise of market liberalism across the OECD: 1977-2007. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin; 2009:
32. Kuisma M.Social democratic internationalism and the welfare state after the “Golden Age.”.Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association. 2007;42 (1): 9-26
33. Lindell M.,Karagozoglu N.Corporate environmental behaviour: A comparison between Nordic and US Firms.Business Strategy and the Environment. 2001;10:38-52
34. Loikkanen T.,Hyytinen K.,Koivusalo S.Yhteiskuntavastuu ja kilpailukyky suomalaisyrityksissä—Nykytila ja kehitysnäkymät. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland; 2007:
35. Matten D.,Moon J.“Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33 (2): 404-424
36. McCallinJ.WebbT. (2004). Corporate responsibility progress in Scandinavia. Retrieved from http://www.ethicalcorp.com/content/corporate-responsibility-progress-scandinavia
37. Midttun A.,Gautesen K.,Gjølberg M.The political economy of CSR in Western Europe.Corporate Governance—The International Journal of Business in Society. 2006;6 (4): 369-385
38. MilneR. (2009, March22). Nordic model is “Future of Capitalism.”Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2a0ffc30-170c-11de-9a72-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1zpT4kRoS
39. Morsing M.Corporate cocial responsibility across Europe. Habisch A. J., ed. New York, NY/Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2005:23-35.
40. NørgaardE. (2007). Nordisk sosialstatistikk i 60 år—Flere ulikheter enn du tror [Nordic social statistics over the last 60 years—Larger inequalities than you expected]. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/ssp/utg/200701/06/
41. St. meld. No. 21 (1999-2000) Menneskeverd i sentrum, Handlingsplan for menneskerettigheter. Oslo, Norway: Author; 1999-2000:
42. Corporate responsibility in a global economy. Oslo, Norway: Author; 2008-2009:
43. Norwegian Government. (2012). Report No 10 2008/2009 to the Storting. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/ud/Documents/propositions-and-reports/Reports-to-the-Storting/2008-2009/report-no-10-2008-2009-to-the-storting/9/5.html?id=566008
44. Organisation for Ecoonomic Cooperation and Development. (2005). OECD in figures. Statistics on the member countries. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/fulltext/0105061e.pdf?expires=1337184164&id=id&accname=freeContent&checksum=06955420873B2C71CEA0382D86F5AF63
45. Porter M. E.,Kramer M. R.Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.Harvard Business Review. 2006;84 (12): 78-92
46. Preuss L.,Haunschild A.,Matten D.Trade unions and CSR: A European research agenda.Journal of Public Affairs. 2006;6:256-268
47. Sadler D.,Lloyd S.Neo-liberalising corporate social responsibility: A political economy of corporate citizenship.Geoforum. 2009;40:613-622
48. Sapir A.Globalisation and the reform of European social models: Background document for the presentation at ECOFIN Informal Meeting in Manchester. Brussels, Belgium: ECOFIN; 2005:
49. Schmitter P. C.Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Berger S., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1981:285-327.
50. Siaroff A.Corporatism in 24 industrialised democracies: Meaning and measurement.European Journal of Political Research. 1999;36:175-205
51. State Secretary Graham S.Bedriftenes samfunnsansvar—et politikkområde i støpeskjeen. Oslo, Norway: ; 2005:
52. Betänkande från Kommittén om AP-fondernas etik—och miljöansvar. Stockholm, Sweden: Webarchive; 2008:
53. Swedish Government. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/2657
54. Webarchive. (2012). Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/sectors/sustainability/corp-responsibility/page45192.html/ -
55. Whitley R.Divergent capitalisms. The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999:
56. Zadek S.The civil corporation. The new economy of corporate citizenship. London: Earthscan; 2001:
57. ZadekS. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.zadek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Harvard_International_Review_Responsible_Competitiveness_September2008.pdf –