Application of the hyper-poisson generalized linear model for analyzing motor vehicle crashes

Risk Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 919-930

  Khazraee, S Hadi ^a   Sáez Castillo, Antonio Jose ^b   Geedipally, Srinivas Reddy ^c   Lord, Dominique ^a  

^a Texas A and M University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Dispersion parameter; Hyper Poisson; Underdispersion

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; DISPERSIONS; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS;

CONWAY-MAXWELL-POISSON; DISPERSION PARAMETERS; GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL; GOODNESS-OF-FIT MEASURE; HYPER-POISSON; MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES; NEGATIVE BINOMIAL MODELS; UNDERDISPERSION;

POISSON DISTRIBUTION;

ACCIDENT; AUTOMOBILE; DISPERSION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POISSON RATIO; RAILWAY; ROAD; SOCIAL THEORY;

CANADA; KOREA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; TORONTO;

ONTARIO; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; LINEAR MODELS; ONTARIO; POISSON DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84931374239     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12296     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lord D, Mannering F. The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation Research - Part A, 2010; 44(5):291-305.
2. Oh J, Washington SP, Nam D. Accident prediction model for railway-highway interfaces. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2006; 38(2):346-356.
3. Consul P, Famoye F. Generalized Poisson regression model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 1992; 21(1):89-109.
4. Castillo J, Pérez-Casany M. Overdispersed and underdispersed Poisson generalizations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2005; 134:486-500.
5. Cameron AC, Johansson P. Count data regression using series expansions: With applications. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1997; 12(3):203-223.
6. Conway RW, Maxwell WL. A queuing model with state dependent service rates. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 1962; 12:132-136.
7. Shmueli G, Minka T, Kadane JB, Borle S, Boatwright P. A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: Revival of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 2005; 54(1):127-142.
8. Lord D, Guikema SD, Geedipally S. Application of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson generalized linear model for analyzing motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2008; 40(3):1123-1134.
9. Lord D, Geedipally SR, Guikema SD. Extension of the application of Conway-Maxwell-Poisson models: Analyzing traffic crash data exhibiting underdispersion. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30(8):1268-1276.
10. Geedipally SR, Lord D. Examination of crash variances estimated by Poisson-Gamma and Conway-Maxwell-Poisson models. Transportation Research Record, 2011; 2241:59-67.
11. Sellers KF, Shmueli G. A flexible regression model for count data. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2010; 4(2):943-961.
12. Sellers K, Borle S, Shmueli G. The COM-Poisson model for count data: A survey of methods and application. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 2012; 28(2):104-116.
13. Francis RA, Geedipally SR, Guikema SD, Dhavala SS, Lord D, LaRocca S. Characterizing the performance of the Conway-Maxwell Poisson generalized linear model. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(1):167-183.
14. Winkelmann R. Duration dependence and dispersion in count-data models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1995; 13(4):467-474.
15. Zou Y, Geedipally SR, Lord D. Evaluating the double Poisson generalized linear model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013; 59:497-505.
16. Daniels S, Brijs T, Nuyts E, Wets G. Explaining variation in safety performance of roundabouts. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010; 42(2):393-402.
17. Daniels S, Brijs T, Nuyts E, Wets G. Extended prediction models for crashes at roundabouts. Safety Science, 2011; 49(2):198-207.
18. Efron B. Double exponential-families and their use in generalized linear-regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1986; 81(395):709-721.
19. Sáez-Castillo AJ, Conde-Sánchez A. A hyper-Poisson regression model for overdispersed and underdispersed count data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2012; 61:148-157.
20. Bardwell GE, Crow EL. A two-parameter family of hyper-Poisson distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1964; 9(305):133-141.
21. Hauer E. Overdispersion in modeling accidents on road sections and in empirical Bayes estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2001; 33(6):799-808.
22. Heydecker BG, Wu J. Identification of sites for road accident remedial work by Bayesian statistical methods: An example of uncertain inference. Advances in Engineering Software, 2001; 32:859-869.
23. Miaou S-P, Lord D. Modeling traffic-flow relationships at signalized intersections: Dispersion parameter, functional form and Bayes vs empirical Bayes. Transportation Research Record, 2003; 1840:31-40.
24. Mitra S, Washington SP. On the nature of over-dispersion in motor vehicle crash prediction models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2007; 39(3):459-468.
25. Guikema SD, Coffelt JP. A flexible count data regression model for risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(1):213-223.
26. Johnson NL, Kotz S, Kemp AW. Univariate Discrete Distributions, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 2005.
27. Saha K, Paul S. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the negative binomial dispersion parameter. Biometrics, 2005; 61(1):179-185.
28. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Highway Safety Manual, 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2010.
29. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011.
30. Lord, D. The Prediction of Accidents on Digital Networks: Characteristics and Issues Related to the Application of Accident Prediction Models. Dissertation, Toronto, ON: University of Toronto, 2000.
31. Miranda-Moreno LF, Fu L. Traffic Safety Study: Empirical Bayes or Full Bayes? 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2007.
32. SAS Institute Inc. SAS System for Windows, 9th ver. Cary, NC, 2002.
33. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
34. Oh J, Lyon C, Washington SP, Persaud BN, Bared J. Validation of the FHWA crash models for rural intersections: Lessons learned. Transportation Research Record, 2003; 1840:41-49.