Uptake of CeO2 Nanoparticles and Its Effect on Growth of Medicago arborea In Vitro Plantlets

Biological Trace Element Research

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 143-150

  Gomez Garay, Aranzazu ^a   Pintos, Beatriz ^a   Manzanera, Jose Antonio ^b   Lobo, Carmen ^c   Villalobos, Nieves ^d   Martín, Luisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c IMIDRA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

ICP AES; In vitro culture; Nanoparticles; Photosynthesis

Indexed keywords

CERIC OXIDE; CERIUM; CHLOROPHYLL; NANOPARTICLE; PHOTOSYSTEM II;

BIOMASS; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; GERMINATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MEDICAGO; METABOLISM; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHOTOSYSTEM II; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; SEEDLING; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

BIOMASS; CERIUM; CHLOROPHYLL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; GERMINATION; HYPOCOTYL; MEDICAGO; NANOPARTICLES; PHOTOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHOTOSYSTEM II PROTEIN COMPLEX; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; SEEDLING; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84931292872     PISSN: 01634984     EISSN: 15590720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-014-0089-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Pilon-Smits EAH, Quinn CF, Tapken W, Malagoli M, Schiavon M (2009) Physiological functions of beneficial elements. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:267–274
2. Yin S, Ze Y, Liu C, Li N, Zhou M, Duan Y, Hong F (2009) Cerium relieves the inhibition of nitrogen metabolism of spinach caused by magnesium deficiency. Biol Trace Elem Res 132:247–258
3. He YW, Loh CS (2000) Cerium and lanthanum promote floral initiation and reproductive growth of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci 159:117–124
4. Hu QH, Ye ZJ (1996) Physiological effects of rare earth elements on plants. Plant Physiol Comm 32(4):296–300
5. Darlington TK, Neigh AM, Spencer MT, Nguyen OT, Oldenburg SJ (2009) Nanoparticle characteristics affecting environmental fate and transport through soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 28(6):1191–1199
6. 3 to cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Environ Sci Technol 46(3):1834–1841
7. Metzler DM, Erdem A, Tseng YH, Huang CP (2012) Responses of algal cells to engineered nanoparticles measured as algal cell population, chlorophyll a, and lipid peroxidation: effect of particle size and type. J Nanotech Article ID 237284, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2012/237284
8. 2 nanoparticles and assessment of their differential toxicity in four edible plant species. J Agr Food Chem 58(6):3689–3693
9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Ecological effects test guidelines (OPPTS 850.4200): seed germination/root elongation toxicity test. EPA 712–C–96-154. Washington, DC.
10. Remedios C, Rosario F, Bastos V (2012) Environmental nanoparticles interactions with plants: morphological, physiological, and genotoxic aspects. J Bot Article ID 751686, 8 pages doi:10.1155/2012/751686
11. Diatloff E, Smith FW, Asher CJ (2008) Effects of lanthanum and cerium on the growth and mineral nutrition of corn and mungbean. Ann Bot-London 101(7):971–982
12. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7315–7320
13. Weiping S, Fashui H, Zhigang W, Yuzhen Z, Fugen G, Hongoing X, Mingliang Y, Youhong C, Mizhen Z, Jiale S (2003) Effects of cerium on nitrogen metabolism of peach plantlet in vitro. Biol Trace Elem Res 95:256–268
14. Martín JP, Pintos B, Rebordinos I, Villalobos N, Guerra H, Martín L (2000) Embryogenic response in different Medicago arborea L. explants depending on cytokinin/auxin balances. J Plant Physiol 165:801–804
15. Lee W-M, An Y-J, Yoon H, Kweon H-S (2008) Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1915–1921
16. OECD (2006) Test No. 208: Terrestrial plant test: seedling emergence and seedling growth test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264070066-en
17. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15:473–497
18. Fang S, Sun W, Hu H, Zhang H, Zheng K (2012) Chlorophyll content of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) estimation from leaf SPAD, chlorophyll fluorescence and reflectance properties. Adv Sci Lett 11:702–705
19. Garate A, Ramón AM, Carpena OR (1984) Influencia del boro sobre el manganeso y otros nutrientes en extractos de tejidos vasculares. Annales de Edafología y Agrobiología 43(9–10):1467–1477
20. Stampoulis D, Sinha SK, White JC (2009) Assay-dependent phytotoxicity of nanoparticles to plants. Environ Sci Technol 43(24):9473–9479
21. Ma C, Chhikara S, Xing B, Musante C, White JC, Dhankher OP (2013) Physiological and molecular response of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) to nanoparticle cerium and indium oxide exposure. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. doi:10.1021/sc400098h
22. Shyam R, Aery NC (2011) Effect of cerium on seed germination and early seedling growth of wheat. NBU J Plant Sci 5:51–55
23. Shyam R, Aery NC (2012) Effect of cerium on growth, dry matter production, biochemical constituents and enzymatic activities of cowpea plants [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12(1):1–14
24. Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Zink JI, Nel AE (2008) Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano 2(10):2121–2134
25. Heckert EG, Karakoti AS, Seal S, Self WT (2008) The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanoceria. Biomaterials 29:2705–2709
26. Rico CM, Morales MI, McCreary R, Castillo-Michel H, Barrios AC, Hong J, Tafoya A, Lee WY, Varela-Ramirez A, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2013) Cerium oxide nanoparticles modify the antioxidative stress enzyme activities and macromolecule composition in rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 47:14110–14118
27. Asli S, Neumann PM (2009) Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide nanoparticles can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport. Plant Cell Environ 32:577–584
28. Prieto P, Peñuelas J, Llusia J, Asensio D, Estiarte M (2009) Effects of long-term experimental night-time warming and drought on photosynthesis, Fv/Fm and stomatal conductance in the dominant species of a Mediterranean shrubland. Acta Physiol Plant 31:729–739
29. Rodea-Palomares I, Gonzalo S, Santiago-Morales J, Leganes F, Garcia-Calvo E, Rosal R, Fernandez-Pinas F (2012) An insight into the mechanisms of nanoceria toxicity in aquatic photosynthetic organisms. Aquat Toxicol 122:133–143
30. Rohácek K (2002) Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: the definitions, photosynthetic meaning, and mutual relationships. Photosynthetica 40:13–29
31. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668
32. Fracheboud Y, Jompuk C, Ribaut JM, Stamp P, Leipner J (2004) Genetic analysis of cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize. Plant Mol Biol 56:241–253
33. Krause GH, Weiss E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis; the basics. Annu Rev Plant Phys 42:313–349
34. 2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170:489–504
35. Gholamin R, Khayatnezhad M (2011) The effects of water and salt stresses on germination in two bread wheat genotypes. Ar J Biotech 10(77):17805–17811
36. Bounfour M, Tanigoshi LK, Chen C, Cameron SJ, Klauer S (2002) Chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence in red raspberry leaves infested with Tetranychus urticae and Eotetranychus carpini borealis (Acari: Tetranychidae). Environ Entomol 31(2):215–220
37. Ma X, Geiser-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A (2010) Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci Total Environ. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.031