Behaviour in captivity predicts some aspects of natural behaviour, but not others, in a wild cricket population

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 282, Issue 1809, 2015, Pages

  Fisher, David N ^a   James, Adéle ^b   Rodríguez Muñoz, Rolando ^a   Tregenza, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

Animal personality; Exploration; Gryllus; Laboratory; Shyness; Wild

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIOASSAY; CAPTIVITY; CRICKET; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPLORATION; FITNESS; GENE EXPRESSION; LABORATORY METHOD; LIGHT EFFECT; MONITORING; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; WILD POPULATION;

ANIMALIA; GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS; GRYLLUS CAMPESTRIS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERSONALITY;

EID: 84931287973     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0708     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004 Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 372–378. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009)
2. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ. 2007 Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 82, 291–318. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x)
3. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009 The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 77, 771–783. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022)
4. Wolf M, Weissing FJ. 2012 Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 452–461. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.001)
5. Carere C, Maestripieri D. 2013 Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
6. Johnson JC, Sih A. 2005 Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 390–396. (doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0943-5)
7. Dall SRX, Houston AI, McNamara JM. 2004 The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol. Lett. 7, 734–739. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00618.x)
8. Carter AJ, Feeney WE, Marshall HH, Cowlishaw G, Heinsohn R. 2013 Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 88, 465–475. (doi:10.1111/brv.12007)
9. Bell A. 2012 Personality in the wild. Nature 491, 4–5. (doi:10.1038/491S4a)
10. Niemela¨ P, Dingemanse N. 2014 Artificial environments and the study of ‘adaptive’ personalities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 245–247. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.007)
11. Smith BR, Blumstein DT. 2008 Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. 19, 448–455. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arm144)
12. Archard GA, Braithwaite VA. 2010 The importance of wild populations in studies of animal temperament. J. Zool. 281, 149–160. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00714.x)
13. Herborn KA, Macleod R, Miles WTS, Schofield ANB, Alexander L, Arnold KE. 2010 Personality in captivity reflects personality in the wild. Anim. Behav. 79, 835–843. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.026)
14. Seyfarth R. 2012 Variation in personality and fitness in wild female baboons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16 980–16 985. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1210780109)
15. Godfrey SS, Bradley JK, Sih A, Bull CM. 2012 Lovers and fighters in sleepy lizard land: where do aggressive males fit in a social network? Anim. Behav. 83, 209–215. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.028)
16. Desrochers A. 1992 Age and foraging success in European blackbirds: variation between and with individuals. Anim. Behav. 43, 885–894. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(06)80002-3)
17. Réale D, Gallant BY, Leblanc M, Festa-Bianchet M. 2000 Consistency of temperament in bighorn ewes and correlates with behaviour and life history. Anim. Behav. 60, 589–597. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1530)
18. Konecna´ M, Lhota S, Weiss A, Urbánek T, Adamová T, Pluhácek J. 2008 Personality in free-ranging Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus) males: subjective ratings and recorded behavior. J. Comp. Psychol. 122, 379–389. (doi:10.1037/a0012625)
19. Briffa M, Greenaway J. 2011 High in situ repeatability of behaviour indicates animal personality in the beadlet anemone Actinia equina (Cnidaria). PLoS ONE 6, e21963. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021963)
20. Carter A, Goldizen A, Heinsohn R. 2012 Personality and plasticity: temporal behavioural reaction norms in a lizard, the Namibian rock agama. Anim. Behav. 84, 471–477. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.001)
21. Aplin L, Farine D, Morand-Ferron J. 2013 Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). Ecol. Lett. 16, 1365–1372. (doi:10.1111/ele.12181)
22. Cole EF, Quinn JL. 2012 Personality and problemsolving performance explain competitive ability in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. A 279, 1168–1175. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1539)
23. Minderman J, Reid JM, Evans PGH, Whittingham MJ. 2009 Personality traits in wild starlings: exploration behavior and environmental sensitivity. Behav. Ecol. 20, 830–837. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arp067)
24. Adriaenssens B, Johnsson JI. 2013 Natural selection, plasticity and the emergence of a behavioural syndrome in the wild. Ecol. Lett. 16, 47–55. (doi:10.1111/ele.12011)
25. Amy M, Sprau P, de Goede P, Naguib M. 2010 Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3685–3692. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0598)
26. Kluen E, Brommer JE. 2013 Context-specific repeatability of personality traits in a wild bird: a reaction-norm perspective. Behav. Ecol. 24, 650–658. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ars221)
27. Bouwhuis S, Quinn JL, Sheldon BC, Verhulst S. 2014 Personality and basal metabolic rate in a wild bird population. Oikos 123, 56–62. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00654.x)
28. Brown C, Jones F, Braithwaite V. 2005 In situ examination of boldness–shyness traits in the tropical poeciliid, Brachyraphis episcopi. Anim. Behav. 70, 1003–1009. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.022)
29. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, Tinbergen JM. 2004 Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 847–852. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2680)
30. Patrick SC, Chapman JR, Dugdale HL, Quinn JL, Sheldon BC. 2012 Promiscuity, paternity and personality in the great tit. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1724–1730. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1820)
31. Biro PA. 2012 Do rapid assays predict repeatability in labile (behavioural) traits? Anim. Behav. 83, 1295–1300. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.036)
32. Beckmann C, Biro PA. 2013 On the validity of a single (boldness) assay in personality research. Ethology 119, 937–947. (doi:10.1111/eth.12137)
33. Edwards HA, Winney IS, Schroeder J, Dugdale HL. 2013 Do rapid assays predict repeatability in labile (behavioural) traits? A reply to Biro. Anim. Behav. 85, e1–e3. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.021)
34. Biro PA. 2013 On the use of rapid assays in personality research: a response to Edwards et al. Anim. Behav. 86, e1–e3. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.020)
35. Boon AK, Réale D, Boutin S. 2008 Personality, habitat use, and their consequences for survival in North American red squirrels Tamiasciurus hudsonicus. Oikos 117, 1321–1328. (doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16567.x)
36. Boyer N, Réale D, Marmet J, Pisanu B, Chapuis J-L. 2010 Personality, space use and tick load in an introduced population of Siberian chipmunks Tamias sibiricus. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 538–547. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01659.x)
37. Van Overveld T, Matthysen E. 2010 Personality predicts spatial responses to food manipulations in free-ranging great tits (Parus major). Biol. Lett. 6, 187–190. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0764)
38. Armitage KB. 1986 Individual differences in the behavior of juvenile yellow-bellied marmots. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 419–424. (doi:10.1007/BF00300516)
39. Armitage KB. 1986 Individuality, social behavior, and reproductive success in yellow-bellied marmots. Ecology 67, 1186–1193. (doi:10.2307/1938674)
40. Svendsen GE, Armitage KB. 1973 Mirror-image stimulation applied to field behavioral studies. Ecology 54, 623–627. (doi:10.2307/1935349)
41. Fraser DF, Gilliam JF, Daley MJ, Le AN, Skalski GT. 2001 Explaining leptokurtic movement distributions: intrapopulation variation in boldness and exploration. Am. Nat. 158, 124–135. (doi:10.1086/321307)
42. Briffa M, Rundle SD, Fryer A. 2008 Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1305–1311. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0025)
43. Kralj-Fisˇer S, Schuett W. 2014 Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother? Anim. Behav. 91, 41–52. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.016)
44. Mather JA, Logue DM. 2013 The bold and the spineless: invertebrate personalities. In Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution (eds C Carere, D Maestripieri), pp. 13–35. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Pinter-Wollman N, Gordon DM, Holmes S. 2012 Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies. Behav. Ecol. 23, 1022–1029. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ars066)
46. Rodrıíguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Slate J, Walling CA, Tregenza T. 2010 Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328, 1269–1272. (doi:10.1126/science.1188102)
47. Coleman K, Wilson DS. 1998 Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. Anim. Behav. 56, 927–936. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0852)
48. Westneat DF, Hatch MI, Wetzel DP, Ensminger AL. 2011 Individual variation in parental care reaction norms: integration of personality and plasticity. Am. Nat. 178, 652–667. (doi:10.1086/662173)
49. Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Tregenza T. 2011 Guarding males protect females from predation in a wild insect. Curr. Biol. 21, 1716–1719. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.053)
50. Biro PA, Dingemanse NJ. 2009 Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 66–67. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.001)
51. Carter AJ, Heinsohn R, Goldizen AW, Biro PA. 2012 Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards. Anim. Behav. 83, 1051–1058. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.033)
52. Fisher DN, David M, Tregenza T, Rodríguez-Muñoz R. In press. Dynamics of among-individual behavioral variation over adult lifespan in a wild insect. Behav. Ecol. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arv048)
53. Niemela¨ PT, Vainikka A, Hedrick AV, Kortet R. 2012 Integrating behaviour with life history: boldness of the field cricket, Gryllus integer, during ontogeny. Funct. Ecol. 26, 450–456. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01939.x)
54. Hedrick AV, Kortet R. 2006 Hiding behaviour in two cricket populations that differ in predation pressure. Anim. Behav. 72, 1111–1118. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.018)
55. Hedrick AV. 2000 Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 671–675. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1054)
56. Niemela¨ P, DiRienzo N, Hedrick A. 2012 Predatorinduced changes in the boldness of naı¨ve field crickets, Gryllus integer, depends on behavioural type. Anim. Behav. 84, 129–135. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.019)
57. R Development Core Team 2013 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
58. Hadfield JD. 2010 MCMC methods for multiresponse generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22.
59. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2010 Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 85, 935–956. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x)
60. Smith DW, Murray LW. 1984 An alternative to Eisenhart’s model II and mixed model in the case of negative variance estimates. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79, 145–151. (doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10477077)
61. Hadfield JD. 2012 MCMC model selection reference. See http://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixedmodels/2012q2/018096.html.
62. Sardell RJ, Arcese P, Keller LF, Reid JM. 2012 Are there indirect fitness benefits of female extra-pair reproduction? Lifetime reproductive success of within-pair and extra-pair offspring. Am. Nat. 179, 779–793. (doi:10.1086/665665)
63. Fox RA, Ladage LD, Roth TC, Pravosudov VV. 2009 Behavioral profile predicts dominance status in mountain chickadees. Anim. Behav. 77, 1441–1448. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.022)
64. Uher J. 2011 Individual behavioral phenotypes: an integrativemeta-theoretical framework. Why ‘behavioral syndromes’ are not analogs of ‘personality’. Dev. Psychobiol. 53, 521–548. (doi:10.1002/dev.20544)
65. Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D. 2008 Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117, 641–653. (doi:10.1111/j.2008.0030-1299.16513.x)
66. Rost R, Honegger HW. 1987 The timing of premating and mating behavior in a field population of the cricket Gryllus campestris L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 279–289. (doi:10.1007/BF00299965)
67. Remmert H. 1985 Crickets in sunshine. Oecologia 68, 29–33. (doi:10.1007/BF00379469)
68. Rudin FS, Briffa M. 2012 Is boldness a resource-holding potential trait? Fighting prowess and changes in startle response in the sea anemone, Actinia equina. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1904–1910. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2418)
69. Duckworth RA. 2010 Evolution of personality: developmental constraints on behavioral flexibility. Auk 127, 752–758. (doi:10.1525/auk.2010.127.4.752)
70. Williams G. 1966 Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am. Nat. 100, 687–690. (doi:10.1086/282461)
71. Hirshfield MF, Tinkle DW. 1975 Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 2227–2231. (doi:10.1073/pnas.72.6.2227)
72. Snook RR. 2014 The evolution of polyandry. In The evolution of insect mating systems (eds DM Shuker, LW Simmons), pp. 159–180. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.