Explaining high and low performers in complex intervention trials: A new model based on diffusion of innovations theory

Trials

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  McMullen, Heather ^a   Griffiths, Chris ^a   Leber, Werner ^a   Greenhalgh, Trisha ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex interventions; Diffusion of innovations; Point of care testing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; COMPLEX INTERVENTION TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION THEORY; DOCTOR NURSE RELATION; ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH; EXPERIENCE; HEALTH CARE; HIV RAPID TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SEROLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENGLAND; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMAN RELATION; IMMUNOLOGY; MASS COMMUNICATION; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; POINT OF CARE TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VIROLOGY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; LONDON; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SELECTION; POINT-OF-CARE TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84931262100     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0755-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694-6.
2. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
3. Guise JM, Chang C, Viswanathan M, Glick S, Treadwell J, Umscheid CA, et al. Systematic reviews of complex multicomponent health care interventions. Report No. 14-EHC003-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK194846/ . Accessed 22 May 2015.
4. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ. 2007;334:455-9.
5. Eldridge S, Kerry S. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
6. Tosh G, Soares-Weiser K, Adams CE. Pragmatic vs explanatory trials: the Pragmascope tool to help measure differences in protocols of mental health randomized controlled trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13:209-15.
7. Emsley R, Dunn G, White IR. Mediation and moderation of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19:237-70.
8. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660-80.
9. Blackwood B, O'Halloran P, Porter S. On the problems of mixing RCTs with qualitative research: the case of the MRC framework for the evaluation of complex healthcare interventions. J Res Nurs. 2010;15:511-21.
10. Cohn S, Clinch M, Bunn C, Stronge P. Entangled complexity: why complex interventions are just not complicated enough. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18:40-3.
11. Petticrew M. When are complex interventions 'complex'? When are simple interventions 'simple'? Eur J Public Health. 2011;21:397-8.
12. Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008;336:1281-3.
13. Craig P, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:585-7.
14. Shepperd S, Lewin S, Straus S, Clarke M, Eccles MP, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000086.
15. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328:1561-3.
16. Denis JL, Hébert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier LH. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Manage Rev. 2002;27:60-73.
17. Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3496.
18. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: UK Medical Research Council guidance. London: Medical Research Council Population Health Science Research Network; 2014. http://decipher.uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/MRC-PHSRN-Process-evaluation-guidance.pdf . Accessed 22 May 2015.
19. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63.
20. Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2299-306.
21. Marchal B, Westhorp G, Wong G, Van Belle S, Greenhalgh T, Kegels G, et al. Realist RCTs of complex interventions - an oxymoron. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:124-8.
22. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press/Simon and Schuster; 2003.
23. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581-629.
24. Leber, W, McMullen, H, Anderson, J et al. Promotion of rapid testing for HIV in primary care (RHIVA2): a clusterrandomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2015; (published online April 29) doi: S2352-3018/S2352-3018(15)00059-4 .
25. Leber W, McMullen H, Marlin N, Bremner S, Santos AC, Terris-Prestholt F, et al. Point-of-care HIV testing in primary care and early detection of HIV (RHIVA2): a cluster randomised controlled trial [abstract]. Lancet. 2013;382 Special Issue:S7.
26. Yin Z, Brown A, Hughes G, Nardone A, Gill ON, Delpech V. HIV and AIDS Reporting Team, HIV and STI Development, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Health Protection Directorate. HIV in the United Kingdom: 2014 report. London: Public Health England, 2014. http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/377194/2014_PHE_HIV_annual_report_19_11_2014.pdf . Accessed 22 May 2015.
27. British HIV Association, British Association for Sexual Health, British Infection Society. UK national guidelines for HIV testing 2008. London: British HIV Association; 2008. http://www.bhiva.org/documents/guidelines/testing/glineshivtest08.pdf . Accessed 22 May 2015.
28. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Increasing the uptake of HIV testing among black Africans in England. NICE Guidelines (PH33). London: NICE; 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/PH33 . Accessed 22 May 2015.
29. Cook D, Gilbert M, DiFrancesco L, Krajden M. Detection of early sero-conversion HIV infection using the INSTI HIV-1 Antibody Point-of-Care Test. Open AIDS J. 2010;4:176-9.
30. bioLytical Laboratories. INSTI HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody test kit: clinician's briefing notes and user guide. Richmond, BC, Canada: bioLytical Laboratories; 2007. http://www.biolytical.com/products/instiHIV . Accessed 22 May 2015.
31. Robson J, Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Eldridge S, Donstal I, Madurasinghe V, et al. NHS health check programme: national evaluation. London: Queen Mary University of London; 2014.
32. Watson TJ. Ethnography, reality, and truth: the vital need for studies of 'how things work' in organizations and management. J Manag Stud. 2011;48:202-17.
33. Shaw SE, Russell J, Parsons W, Greenhalgh T. The view from nowhere? How think tanks work to shape health policy. Crit Policy Stud. 2015;9:58-77. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.964278 .
34. Prost A, Griffiths CJ, Anderson J, Wight D, Hart GJ. Feasibility and acceptability of offering rapid HIV tests to patients registering with primary care in London (UK): a pilot study. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85:326-9.
35. EMIS/Egton Medical Information Systems Group. Company profile. http://www.emis-online.com/company-profile . Accessed 22 May 2015.
36. In Practice Systems. Vision for GP practices. http://www.inps4.co.uk/vision/vision-gp-practices . Accessed 22 May 2015.
37. Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. National Centre for Social Research. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, Cabinet Office; 2003. http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/a_quality_framework_tcm6-38740.pdf . Accessed 22 May 2015.
38. Strauss A, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
39. Van Maanen J. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011.
40. Greenhalgh T. Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations. BMJ. 2008;337:a2448.