Integration of electromagnetic induction sensor data in soil sampling scheme optimization using simulated annealing

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 187, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Barca, E ^a   Castrignano A ^b   Buttafuoco, G ^c   De Benedetto, D ^b   Passarella, G ^a  

^a WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

^c CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bulk electrical conductivity; EMI sensor; Sampling; Soil water content; Spatial simulated annealing; Spatial variability

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; INTERPOLATION; SAMPLING; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS;

AGRICULTURAL FIELDS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION SENSORS; EMI SENSORS; OPTIMIZATION CRITERIA; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS;

SIMULATED ANNEALING;

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; SAMPLING; SIMULATED ANNEALING; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL SURVEY; SOIL WATER; SPATIAL VARIATION; WATER CONTENT;

ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; BULK DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION SENSOR; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ITALY; KRIGING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SPATIAL SIMULATED ANNEALING; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PROCEDURES; SOIL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ITALY; PUGLIA;

SOIL; WATER;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ITALY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOFTWARE; SOIL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATER;

EID: 84931261022     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4570-y     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adamchuk, V. I., & Viscarra Rossel, R. A. (2010). Development of on-the-go proximal soil sensor systems. In R. A. Viscarra Rossel, A. B. McBratney, & B. Minasny (Eds.), Proximal soil sensing (pp. 15–28). New York: Springer.
2. Adamchuk, V. I., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Sudduth, K. A., & Schulze Lammers, P. (2011). Sensor fusion for precision agriculture. In C. Thomas (Ed.), Sensor fusion - foundation and applications (pp. 27–40). Croatia: In-Tech.
3. Barca, E., Passarella, G., Vurro, M., & Morea, A. (2011). A software for optimal information based downsizing/upsizing of existing monitoring networks. In Spatial2 Conference: Spatial Data Methods for Environmental and Ecological Processes, Foggia (IT), 1-2 September 2011.
4. Barca, E., Passarella, G., Vurro, M., & Morea, A. (2015). MSANOS: Data-driven, multi-approach software for optimal redesign of environmental monitoring networks. Water Resources Management, 29(2), 619–644.
5. Benson, R. R., Glaccum, A., & Noel, M. R. (1988). Geophysical techniques for sensing buried wastes and waste migration. Dublin: National Water Well Association.
6. Campbell, J. (2002). Introduction to remote sensing (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
7. Castrignanò A., Morari F., Fiorentino C., Pagliarin C., Brenna S. (2008) Constrained optimization of spatial sampling in skeletal soils using EMI data and continuous simulated annealing. In Proceeding of 1st Global Workshop on High Resolution Digital Soil Sensing & Mapping. 5–8 February 2008, Sydney – Australia (CD-ROM).
8. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
9. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
10. Corwin, D. L., & Lesch, S. M. (2005). Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity. I. Survey protocols. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 103–133.
11. Cunha, M. C., & Sousa, J. (1999). Water distribution network design optimization: Simulated annealing approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125, 215–221.
12. De Benedetto, D., Castrignanò, A., Sollitto, D., Modugno, F., Buttafuoco, G., & Lo Papa, G. (2012). Integrating geophysical and geostatistical techniques to map the spatial variation of clay. Geoderma, 171–172, 53–63.
13. De Benedetto, D., Castrignanò, A., Rinaldi, M., Ruggieri, S., Santoro, F., Figorito, B., Gualano, S., Diacono, M., & Tamborrino, R. (2013). An approach for delineating homogeneous zones by using multi-sensor data. Geoderma, 199, 117–127.
14. de Gruijter, J., Brus, D., Bierkens, F. P., & Knotters, M. (2006). Sampling for natural resource monitoring. Berlin: Springer.
15. Drosou M., Pitoura E. (2009). Comparing diversity heuristics. Technical Report 2009–05. Computer Science Department, University of Ioannina.
16. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
17. Geovariances (2014). Isatis Technical Ref., ver. 2014, Geovariances & Ecole Des Mines De Paris. Avon Cedex, France, www.geovariances.fr.
18. Kerry, R., Oliver, M. A., & Frogbrook, Z. L. (2010). Sampling in precision agriculture. In M. A. Oliver (Ed.), Geostatistical applications for precision agriculture (pp 35–64). Springer.
19. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671–680.
20. Lobato, F. S., Assis, E. G., Steffen, Jr V., & da Silva Neto, A. J. (2012). Design and identification problems of rotor bearing systems using the simulated annealing algorithm. In M. Sales Guerra Tsuzuki (Ed.), Simulated annealing - single and multiple objective problems (pp 197–216). Croatia: In-Tech.
21. Marchant, B. P., & Lark, R. M. (2010) Sampling in precision agriculture, optimal designs from uncertain models. In M. A. Oliver (Ed.), Geostatistical applications for precision agriculture (pp 65–87). Springer.
22. McBratney, A. B., & Webster, R. (1983). Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. Co-regionalization and multiple sampling strategies. Journal of Soil Science, 34, 137–162.
23. McNeill, J. D. (1980). Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Geonics Limited, Technical Note TN 6, Geonics Ltd. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
24. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Rosenbluth, M., Teller, A., & Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087–1092.
25. Müller, W. G. (1998). Collecting spatial data-optimum design of experiments for random fields. Heidelberg: Physical-Verlag.
26. Nourani, Y., & Andresen, B. (1998). A comparison of simulated annealing cooling strategies. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31, 8373–8385.
27. Pierce, F. J., & Nowak, P. (1999). Aspects of precision agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 67, 1–85.
28. Soil Survey Staff. (2010). Keys to soil taxonomy (11th ed.). Washington: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
29. Stein, A., & Ettema, C. (2003). An overview of spatial sampling procedures and experimental design of spatial studies for ecosystem comparisons. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 94, 31–47.
30. Triki, E., Collette, Y., & Siarry, P. (2005). A theoretical study on the behavior of simulated annealing leading to a new cooling schedule. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 77–92.
31. Van Groenigen, J. W., & Stein, A. (1998). Spatial simulated annealing for constrained optimization of spatial sampling schemes. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 1078–1086.
32. Van Groenigen, J. W., Siderius, W., & Stein, A. (1999). Constrained optimisation of soil sampling for minimisation of the kriging variance. Geoderma, 87(3), 239–259.
33. Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Aarts, E. H. (1987). Simulated annealing. Netherlands: Springer.
34. Viscarra Rossel, R. A., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2013). Proximal soil sensing. In M. A. Oliver, T. F. A. Bishop, & B. P. Marchant (Eds.), Precision agriculture for sustainability and environmental protection (pp. 99–118). Abingdon: Routledge.
35. Wackernagel, H. (2003). Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Berlin: Springer.
36. Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2007). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
37. Webster, R., & Lark, R. M. (2013). Field sampling for environmental science and management. Abingdon: Routledge.