Integrating different data types by regularized unsupervised multiple kernel learning with application to cancer subtype discovery

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2015, Pages i268-i275

  Speicher, Nora K ^a,b   Pfeifer, Nico ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MORTALITY; NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84931091190     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv244     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Gärtner T., et al. (2002). Multi-instance kernels. In: Sammut C. and Hoffmann A.G. (eds) , Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, USA, pp. 179-186
2. Hanahan D. and Weinberg R.A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell, 144, 646-674
3. He X. and Niyogi P. (2004). Locality preserving projections. In: Thrun S. et al (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 153-160
4. Hosmer D.W., Jr., et al (2011). Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. Wiley, New York
5. Huang H.-C., et al. (2012). Affinity aggregation for spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, USA, pp. 773-780
6. Lin Y.-Y., et al. (2011). Multiple kernel learning for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 33, 1147-1160
7. Monti S., et al. (2003). Consensus clustering-a resampling-based method for class discovery and visualization of gene expression microarray data. In: Machine Learning, Functional Genomics Special Issue. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham, MA, USA, pp. 91-118
8. Noushmehr H., et al. (2010). Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell, 17, 510-522
9. Patel M.A., et al. (2014). The future of glioblastoma therapy: synergism of standard of care and immunotherapy. Cancers, 6, 1953-1987
10. Rand W.M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 66, 847-850
11. Rousseeuw P.J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53-65
12. Shen R., et al. (2009). Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis. Bioinformatics, 25, 2906-2912
13. Shen R., et al. (2012). Integrative subtype discovery in glioblastoma using iCluster. PloS One, 7,: e35236
14. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2006). The Cancer Genome Atlas. http://cancergenome.nih.gov/
15. Verhaak R.G.W., et al. (2010). Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell, 17, 98-110
16. von Luxburg U. (2007). A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat. Comput., 17, 395-416
17. Wang B., et al. (2014). Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat. Methods, 11, 333-337
18. Yan S., et al. (2007). Graph embedding and extensions: a general framework for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 29, 40-51