Emphysema progression is visually detectable in low-dose CT in continuous but not in former smokers

European Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2692-2699

  Wille, Mathilde Marie Winkler ^a   Thomsen, Laura H ^a   Dirksen, Asger ^a   Petersen, Jens ^b   Pedersen, Jesper Holst ^c   Shaker, Saher B ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Disease progression; Lung cancer screening; Observer variation; Pulmonary disease, Chronic obstructive COPD

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COMPLICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SMOKING;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SMOKING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84930975081     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3294-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lynch DA, Godwin JD, Safrin S et al (2005) High-resolution computed tomography in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and prognosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 4:488–493
2. Gietema HA, Muller NL, Fauerbach PV et al (2011) Quantifying the extent of emphysema: factors associated with radiologists’ estimations and quantitative indices of emphysema severity using the ECLIPSE cohort. Acad Radiol 6:661–671
3. Sverzellati N, Devaraj A, Desai SR et al (2011) Method for minimizing observer variation for the quantitation of high-resolution computed tomographic signs of lung disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:596–601
4. Hansell DM (2001) Computed tomography of diffuse lung disease: functional correlates. Eur Radiol 9:1666–1680
5. Mets OM, Smit EJ, Mohamed Hoesein FA et al (2012) Visual versus automated evaluation of chest computed tomography for the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One 7:e42227
6. Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A et al (2007) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 6:532–555
7. Gurney JW, Jones KK, Robbins RA et al (1992) Regional distribution of emphysema: correlation of high-resolution CT with pulmonary function tests in unselected smokers. Radiology 2:457–463
8. Kakinuma R, Ashizawa K, Kuriyama K et al (2012) Measurement of focal ground-glass opacity diameters on CT images: interobserver agreement in regard to identifying increases in the size of ground-glass opacities. Acad Radiol 4:389–394
9. Watadani T, Sakai F, Johkoh T et al (2013) Interobserver variability in the CT assessment of honeycombing in the lungs. Radiology 3:936–944
10. Barr RG, Berkowitz EA, Bigazzi F et al (2012) A combined pulmonary-radiology workshop for visual evaluation of COPD: study design, chest CT findings and concordance with quantitative evaluation. COPD 2:151–159
11. Grenier P, Mourey-Gerosa I, Benali K et al (1996) Abnormalities of the airways and lung parenchyma in asthmatics: CT observations in 50 patients and inter- and intraobserver variability. Eur Radiol 2:199–206
12. Ng CS, Desai SR, Rubens MB et al (1999) Visual quantitation and observer variation of signs of small airways disease at inspiratory and expiratory CT. J Thorac Imaging 4:279–285
13. Thomsen LH, Dirksen A, Shaker SB et al (2014) Analysis of FEV decline in relatively healthy heavy smokers: implications of expressing changes in FEV in relative terms. COPD 11:96–104
14. Shaker SB, Dirksen A, Lo P et al (2012) Factors influencing the decline in lung density in a Danish lung cancer screening cohort. Eur Respir J 5:1142–1148
15. Pedersen JH, Ashraf H, Dirksen A et al (2009) The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial–overall design and results of the prevalence round. J Thorac Oncol 5:608–614
16. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H et al (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 3:697–722
17. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1:159–174
18. Lo P, Sporring J, Ashraf H, Pedersen JJ, de Bruijne M (2010) Vessel-guided airway tree segmentation: a voxel classification approach. Med Image Anal 4:527–538
19. Dijkstra AE, Postma DS, ten Hacken N et al (2013) Low-dose CT measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema associated with airflow limitation in heavy smokers: a cross sectional study. Respir Res 14:11
20. Wille MMW, Petersen J, Dirksen A, Pedersen JH, De Bruijne M (2013) Airway distensibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – evaluation by CT airway segmentation and lung density measurement based on the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial. AJRCCM:A2871
21. Hasegawa M, Nasuhara Y, Onodera Y et al (2006) Airflow limitation and airway dimensions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 12:1309–1315
22. Kazantzi A, Costaridou L, Skiadopoulos S et al (2014) Automated 3D iotanterstitial lung disease epsilonxtent quantification: performance evaluation and correlation to PFTs. J Digit Imaging 27(3):380–391