Social mix, reputation and stigma: Exploring residents' perspectives of neighbourhood effects

Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives

Volumn 9789400723092, Issue , 2012, Pages 101-119

  Arthurson, Kathy ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930973381     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Arthurson, K. (2004). From stigma to demolition: Australian debates about housing and social exclusion. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 255-270.
2. Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2001). Disentangling area effects: Evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2277-2298.
3. Baker, E., & Arthurson, K. (2007). Housing, place or social networks: What's more important for relocating tenants? Australian Planner, 44(4), 25-38.
4. Beekman, T., Lyons, F., & Scott, J. (2001). Improving the understanding of the influence of owner occupiers in mixed tenure neighbourhoods. Edinburgh: Report to Scottish Homes.
5. Blockland, T. (2008). You got to remember you live in public housing: Place-making in an American housing project. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(1), 31-46.
6. Bradbury, B., & Chalmers, J. (2003). Housing, location and employment final report. Melbourne: AHURI.
7. Brown, B., Perkins, D., & Brown, B. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighbourhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 259-271.
8. Burke, T., Neske, C., & Ralston, L. (2005). Which households eligible for public housing do not apply and why? AHURI Research and Policy Bulletin. Melbourne: AHURI.
9. City of Port Adelaide Enfield. (2010a). Profile of Hillcrest, based on the 2001 and 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing.
10. City of Port Adelaide Enfield. (2010b). Profile of Northfield, based on the 2001 and 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing.
11. Darcy, M., & Gwyther, G. (2011). Recasting research on 'neighbour hood effects': A collaborative, participatory, trans-national approach. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
12. De Decker, P., & Pannecoucke, I. (2004). The creation of the incapable social tenant in Flanders, Belgium. An appraisal. Journal of Housing and the Built environment, 19(3), 293-309.
13. Galster, G. (2007). Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical analysis. European Journal of Housing Policy, 7(1), 19-43.
14. Hastings, A. (2004). The stigmatisation of social housing estates: Beyond pathological explanations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 233-254.
15. Hastings, A. (2009). Poor neighbourhoods and poor services: Evidence on the 'rationing' of environmental service provision to deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 46(13), 2907-2927.
16. Hastings, A., & Dean, J. (2003). Challenging images: Tackling stigma through estate regeneration. Policy & Politics, 31(2), 171-184.
17. Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The significance of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2103-2110.
18. Kelaher, M., Paul, S., Lambert, H., Ahmad, W., & Davey Smith, G. (2008). The impact of different measures of socioeconomic position on the relationship between ethnicity and health. Annals of Epidemiology, 18(5), 351-356.
19. Krieger, N., Smith, K., Naishadham, D., Hartman, C., & Barbeau, E. (2005). Experiences of discrimination: validity and reliability of a self-report measure for population health research on racism and health. Social Science and Medicine, 61(7), 1576-1596.
20. Link, B., & Phelan, J. (2001). Conceptualising stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363-385.
21. MacIntyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2000). Ecological approaches: The rediscovery of the role of the physical and social environment. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 332-348). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Marmot, M., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2001). Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: A response to Lynch et al. British Medical Journal, 322(7296), 1233-1236.
23. Martin, G., & Watkinson, J. (2005). Rebalancing communities by mixing tenures on social housing estates. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
24. Murray, C. (1994). Underclass: The crisis deepens. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
25. Palmer, C., Ziersch, A., Arthurson, K., & Baum, F. (2004). Danger lurks around every corner fear of crime and its impact on opportunities for social interaction. Urban Policy and Research, 22(4), 411-426.
26. Palmer, C., Ziersch, A., Arthurson, K., & Baum, F. (2005). Challenging the stigma of public housing: preliminary findings from a qualitative study in South Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 23 (4), 393-411.
27. Peel, M. (2003). Lowest rung: Voices of Australian poverty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Permentier, M., van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2008). Same neighbourhood⋯.different views? A confrontation of internal and external neighbourhood reputations. Housing Studies, 23(6), 833-855.
29. Permentier, M., van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2009). Neighbourhood reputation and the intention to leave the neighbourhood. Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2162-2180.
30. Permentier, M., Bolt, G., & van Ham, M. (2010). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perception of neighbourhood reputation. Urban Studies, 48(5), 977-996.
31. Phillips, J. (1994). Redevelopment strategy, policy and planning branch. Adelaide: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
32. Reutter, L., Veenstra, G., Love, R., Raphael, D., & Makwarimba, E. (2009). Who do they think they are, anyway? Perceptions of and responses to poverty stigma. Qualitative Health Research, 19(3), 297-311.
33. Rice, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
34. Robertson, D., Smyth, J., & McIntosh, I. (2008). Neighbourhood identity: Effects of time, location and social class. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
35. Ruming, K., Mee, K., & McGuirk, P. (2004). Questioning the rhetoric of social mix: Courteous community of hidden hostility. Australian Geographical Studies, 42(2), 234-248.
36. Scrambler, G. (2009). Health-related stigma. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(3), 441-455.
37. South Australian Housing Trust. (2005). Mitchell Park Urban Renewal Project, Analysis and determination of the social, physical and financial changes and outcomes in Mitchell Park, Adelaide: Study Brief.
38. van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2010). The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix in labour market outcomes: A longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 257-282.
39. Warr, D. (2005). Social networks in a 'discredited' neighbourhood. Journal of Sociology, 41(3), 285-305.
40. Wassenberg, F. (2004). Renewing stigmatised estates in the Netherlands: A framework for image renewal strategies. Journal of Housing and the Built environment, 19(3), 271-292.
41. Ziersch, A., & Arthurson, K. (2005). Social networks in public and community housing: The impact on employment outcomes. Urban Policy and Research, 23(4), 429-445.
42. Ziersch, A., & Baum, F. E. (2004). Involvement in civil society groups: Is it good for your health? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(6), 493-500.