Population dynamics, migration, and the future of the calakmul biosphere reserve

Biological Diversity: Balancing Interests through Adaptive Collaborative Management

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 261-292

  Ericson, Jenny A ^a   Freudenberger, Mark S ^b   Boege, Eckart ^c  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^b Management   (Madagascar)

^c National Anthropology and History Institute of Mexico (INAH)   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930970792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420042597     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Adams, R. E. W., 1977. Rio Bec archeology, in The Origins of Maya Civilization, Adams, R.E.W., Ed., University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 85-99.
2. Anderson, S. and Rietbergen-McCracken, J., 1994. El diagnostico participativo: un manual aplicado de tecnicas, El Grupo DIP, Merida, Yucatan.
3. Antochiw, M., 1997. La cartografia y los Cehaches, in Gobierno del Estado Libre y Soberano de Campeche, Calakmul: Volver al Sur, Campeche, Mexico, 23-32.
4. Bajracharya, S. B., Gurung, L. P., and Manandhar, A., Population Dynamics and Resource Conservation Initiative in Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Nepal, WWF, Nepal, March.
5. Barton, T., Borrini-Feyerabend, G., de Sherbinin, A., and Warren, P., 1997, Our People, Our Resources, The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland.
6. Berlanga, M. and Wood, P., 1997. Las aves de la Reserva de la Biosfera de Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico, Internal report, Pronatura, Península de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán.
7. Bilsborrow, R. D. and DeLargy, P., 1991. Land use, migration, and natural resource deterioration: the experience of Guatemala and the Sudan, Popul. Dev. Rev., Suppl. 16.
8. Boege, E., 1995. The Calakmul biosphere reserve, Mexico, working paper No. 13, paper presented at international conference, UNESCO South-South Cooperation Programme, Paris.
9. Boege, E. and Murguia, R., 1990. Diagnostico de las actividades humanas que se realizan en la reserva de la biosfera de Calakmul, estado de Campeche, Internal report, Pronatura, Península de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán.
10. Boesveld, M. and Postel-Coster, E., 1991. Planning with women for wise use of the environment. Research and practical issues, in Landscape and Urban Planning, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 20, 141-150.
11. Bruce, J., 1989. Rapid appraisal of tree and land tenure, Food Agric. Organ., Community Forestry Note 5.
12. Caudill, D., 1997. Lessons from the Field: Integration of Population and Environment, World Neighbors, Oklahoma City.
13. Chambers, R., 1983. Rural Development: Putting the Last First, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. CNA (Comision Nacional del Agua), 1996. Internal report: Abastecimiento de agua potable en la region de Xpujil, municipios de Hopelchen y Champoton, Campeche, Gerencia estatal de Campeche, Campeche.
15. (CONAPO) Consejo Nacional de Poblacion, 1996. Situacion demografica del estado de Campeche, Campeche.
16. Cruz, M. C. J., 1996. Management options for biodiversity protection and population, in Human Population, Biodiversity and Protected Areas: Science and Policy Issues, Dompka, V., Ed., American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 71-89.
17. Diario de Yucatan, November 7, 1996. Xpujil, region prioritaria para el Gobierno Federal, dice el titular de Desarrollo Social, Merida, Yucatan.
18. Dominguez, M. D. R., and Folan, W. J., 1995. Calakmul, Mexico: aguadas, bajos, precipitacion y asentamiento en el Peten Campechano, paper presented at IX simposio de investigaciones arqueologicas en Guatemala, Museo Nacional de Arqueologia y Etnologia, July, Guatemala.
19. Dompka, V. and Allcott, P., 1998. Do numbers matter: population impacts on environmental projects, American Association for the Advancement of Science and World Wildlife Fund, Godalming, U.K.
20. Engelman, R., 1998. Plan and Conserve: A Source Book on Linking Population and Environmental Services in Communities, Population Action International, Washington, D.C.
21. Ericson, J., 1996. Conservation and Development on the Border of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Masters thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.
22. Ericson, J., 1997. Regional assessment: Calakmul population-environment initiative, Internal report, World Wildlife Fund Mexico program, Mexico City.
23. Ericson, J., 1998. Population Dynamics in the Ejidos around the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve: Summary, Internal document, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
24. Farriss, N., 1984. Maya Society under Colonial Rule: The Collective Enterprise of Survival, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
25. Faust, B., 1998. Mexican Rural Development and the Plumed Serpent, Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CT.
26. Freudenberger, K. S., 1994. Tree and land tenure: rapid appraisal tools, Food and Agriculture Organization, Community Forestry Manual 4.
27. Freudenberger, M., Mogba, Z., Zana, H., and Missosso, M., 1996. Migrations humaines et leurs impacts sur la conservation des ressources naturelles dans la Réserve de Dzanga-Sangha: Etude de as de l’economie de diamant à Ndélengué, République Centrafricaine, WWF, Social Science and Economics Program.
28. Galindo-Leal, C., 1996. La biosfera de Calakmul y el desarrollo sustentable, in Voz Comun: un espacio de integracion social en Campeche, 30, 20-21.
29. Garrett, W. E., 1989. La ruta Maya, in Natl. Geogr. Mag., 176(4), 424-479.
30. Haenn, N., 1997. Creating communities through acceptance/rejection of migrants in frontier Campeche, paper presented at meeting of Latin American Studies Association, April 17-19, Guadalajara, Mexico.
31. Hecht, S. and Cockburn, A., 1989. The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers and Defenders of the Amazon, Verso, New York.
32. Jones, G., 1989. Maya Resistance to Spanish Rule: Time and History on a Colonial Frontier, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
33. Loudiyi, D., 1994. Calakmul demographic report, Internal report, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
34. Maas Rodriguez, R. and Ericson, J., 1998. Memoria: Metodo y Tecnicas de la “Iniciativa de Poblacion y Medio Ambiente para Calakmul,” Internal document: Pronatura Peninsula de Yucatan, A. C. Merida, Yucatan.
35. McNeely, J. A. and Ness, G., 1996. People, parks, and biodiversity: issues in population-environment dynamics, in Human Population, Biodiversity and Protected Areas: Science and Policy Issues, Dompka, V., Ed., American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 19-70.
36. Miranda, F. and Xolocotzi, H. E., 1985. Los tipos de vegetación de México y su clasificación, in Xolocotzia, Vol. I, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, México.
37. Montejo Alvarez, A. et al., 1997a. Estudio Rural Participativo, Poblacion y Medio Ambiente, Ejido, 11 de Mayo, Calakmul, Campeche, internal document, Pronatura Peninsula de Yucatan, A. C. Merida, Yucatan.
38. Montejo Alvarez, A. et al., 1997b. Estudio Rural Participativo, Poblacion y Medio Ambiente, Ejido: Conhuas, Calakmul, Campeche, internal document, Pronatura Peninsula de Yucatan, A. C. Merida, Yucatan.
39. Murphy, J., 1990. Indigenous forest use and development in the “Maya zone” of Quintana Roo, Mexico, Major paper, York University, Ontario, Canada.
40. Ness, G., with Golay, M. V., 1997. Population Strategies for National Sustainable Development: A Guide to Assist National Policy Makers in Linking Population and Environment in Strategies for Sustainable Development, Earthscan Publications, London.
41. NOM (Norma Official Mexicana) NOM-059-ECOL-1994.
42. Pasos, R., Girot, P., Laforge, M., Torrealba, P., and Kaimowitz, D., 1995. El ultimo despale, la frontera agricola centroamericana, Fundacion para el Desarrollo Economico y Social de Centroamerica (FUNDESCA), Panama.
43. Pichon, F., 1993. Agricultural Settlement, Land Use and Deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon Frontier: A Micro-level Analysis of Colonist Land-Allocation Behavior, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
44. Ronfeldt, D., 1973. Atencingo: The Politics of Agrarian Struggle in a Mexican Ejido, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
45. Rudel, T. and Horowitz, B., 1993. Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Land Clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon, Columbia University Press, New York.
46. Rzedowski, J. and de Rzedowski, C. G., 1989. Transisthmic Mexico: Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Tabasco and Yucatán, in Floristic Inventory of Tropical Countries: The Status of Plant Systematics, Collections, and Vegetation, plus Recommendations for the Future, Campbell, D. G. and Hammond, H. D., Eds., The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
47. Sharer, R. J., 1994. The Ancient Maya, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
48. Stedman, E., 1997. Socioeconomic root causes of biodiversity loss: the case of Calakmul, Mexico, World Wildlife Fund Mexico Program, Mexico City.
49. Tan, P. C. and Tey, N. P., 1994. Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? Evidence from Tenninsular, Malaysia, in Studies in Family Planning, 259(4): 222-231.
50. Thomas, P. M., Jr., 1981. Prehistoric Maya Settlement Patterns at Becan, Campeche, Mexico, Middle American Research Institute, Publ. 45, Tulane University, New Orleans.
51. Turner, II, B. L., 1978. Ancient agricultural land use in the central Maya lowlands, in Pre-Hispanic Maya Agriculture, Harrison, P. D. and Turner II, B. L., Eds., University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
52. Vasquez Sánchez, 1991. Documento de trabajo para la elaboracion del plan de manejo de la reserva de biosfera Calakmul, Campeche, Centro de Estudios para la Conservacion de los Recursos Naturales, A.C. (ECOSFERA), Merida, Yucatan.
53. WWF, 1994. Summary of demographics in Calakmul, Internal report, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
54. Yuñez-Naude, A., Taylor, J. E., and Rodriguez-Gonzalez, M. D. R., 1995. Impactos de las reformas economicas en una poblacion ejidal: una propuesta de analisis cuantitativo, presented at El Taller del Proyecto de Investigacion sobre la Reforma Ejidal, Centro de Estudios Mexico-Estados Unidos, University of California, San Diego, August 25-26.