Editorial: ACM TOMS replicated computational results initiative

ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Heroux, Michael A ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Publication; Replicated computational results; Reproducibility; Validation; Verification; General and reference verification; Software and its engineering formal software verfication

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITIES; VALIDATION; VERFICATION;

VERIFICATION;

EID: 84930855259     PISSN: 00983500     EISSN: 15577295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2743015     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. John Arrowsmith. 2011. Trial watch: Phase II failures: 2008-2010. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 5 (May 2011), 328-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439
2. David H. Bailey. 2014. Fooling the masses: Reproducibility in high-performance computing. https://www.xsede.org/documents/659353/703287/xsede14-bailey.pdf.
3. David H. Bailey and Jonathan M. Borwein. 2014. Set the default to "Open": Reproducible science in the computer age - David H. Bailey. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-h-bailey/set-the-default-to-open-r-b-2635850.html.
4. C. Glenn Begley, George Robertson, Ken Kaitin, Khusru Asadullah, Lee Ellis, Phil Sharp, and Sharon Begley. 2014. In cancer science, many discoveries don't hold up - Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-science-cancer-idUSBRE82R12P20120328.
5. A. P. Davison. 2012. Automated capture of experiment context for easier reproducibility in computational research. Comput. Sci. Engin. 14, 4 (July 2012), 48-56. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.41
6. P. F. Dubois. 2012. Testing scientific programs. Comput. Sci. Engin. 14, 4 (July 2012), 69-73. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.84
7. Juliana Freire and Claudio T. Silva. 2012. Making computations and publications reproducible with Vis-Trails. Comput. Sci. Engin. 14, 4 (July 2012), 18-25. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.76
8. M. Gavish and D. Donoho. 2012. Three dream applications of verifiable computational results. Comput. Sci. Engin. 14, 4 (July 2012), 26-31. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.65
9. Bill Howe. 2012. Virtual appliances, cloud computing, and reproducible research. Comput. Sci. Engin. 14, 4 (July 2012), 36-41. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.62
10. Brian Owens. 2011. Reliability of new drug target claims called into question: Nature News Blog. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/09/reliability-of-new-drug-target.html.
11. V. Stodden, D. H. Bailey, J. Borwein, R. J. LeVeque, W. Rider, and W. Stein. 2013. Setting the default to reproducible: Reproducibility in computational and experimental mathematics. http://icerm.brown.edu/html/programs/topical/tw12-5-rcem/icerm-report.pdf.
12. Field G. Van Zee and Robert A. van de Geijn. 2015. BLIS: A framework for rapidly instantiating BLAS functionality. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 41, 3 (May 2015).
13. P. Vandewalle. 2012. Code sharing is associated with research impact in image processing. Comput. Science Engin. 14, 4 (July 2012), 42-47. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.63
14. James M. Willenbring. 2015. Replicated Computational Results (RCR) report for "BLIS: A Framework for Rapidly Instantiating BLAS Functionality." ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 41, 3 (May 2015).