The visual rhetoric of climate change

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 361-368

  Walsh, Lynda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY;

CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES; COMMON FINDINGS; POLITICAL ACTIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; GRAPHICAL METHOD; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84930819468     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.342     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Isocrates. Isocrates with an English Translation in Three Volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980, Antidosis 255.
2. Gross AG. Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press; 2006, 179.
3. Burri RV, Dumit J. Social studies of scientific imaging and visualization. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J, eds. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008, 297-317.
4. O'Neill SJ, Smith N. Climate change and visual imagery. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:73-87.
5. Hansen A, Machin D. Research visual environmental communication. Environ Commun 2013, 7:151-168.
6. Cagle LE, Tillery D. Climate change research across disciplines: the value and uses of multidisciplinary research reviews for technical communication. Tech Commun Q 2015, 24:147-163.
7. Lorenzoni I, Leiserowitz A, de Franca DM, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Cross-national comparisons of image associations with 'global warming' and 'climate change' among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. J Risk Res 2006, 9:265-281.
8. O'Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S. 'Fear won't do it:' promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 2009, 30:355-379.
9. Schroth O, Angel J, Sheppard S, Dulic A. Visual climate change communication: from iconography to locally framed 3D visualization. Environ Comm 2014, 8:413-432.
10. Dobrin S, Morey S. Introduction: Ecosee: a first glimpse. In: Dobrin S, Morey S, eds. Ecosee: Image, Rhetoric, and Nature. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2009, 1-22.
11. Fleming D. Can pictures be arguments? Argument Advoc 1996, 33:11-22.
12. Gross AG. Toward a theory of verbal-visual interaction: the case of Lavoisier. Rhetor Soc Q 2009, 39:147-169.
13. Birdsell DS, Groarke L. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argument Advoc 1996, 33:1-10.
14. Fahnestock J. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
15. Dyehouse J. 'A Textbook Case Revisited:' visual rhetoric and series patterning in the American Museum of Natural History's horse evolution displays. Tech Commun Q 2011, 20:327-346.
16. Prelli LJ. Visualizing a bounded sea: a case study in rhetorical taxis. In: Prelli LJ, ed. Rhetorics of Display. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press; 2006, 90-120.
17. Foss SK. Ambiguity as persuasion: the Vietnam veterans memorial. Commun Q 1986, 34:326-340.
18. Roundtree AK. Computer Simulation, Rhetoric, and the Scientific Imagination: How Virtual Evidence Shapes Science in the Making and in the News. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2013.
19. Kostelnick C, Hassett M. Shaping Information: The Rhetoric of Visual Conventions. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press; 2003.
20. Barthes R, Howard R. The Semiotic Challenge. New York: Hill & Wang; 1988.
21. Peirce CS. Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs. In: Buchler J, ed. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.; 1955, 98-119.
22. Kress G, Van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge; 1996.
23. Gross AG, Harmon JE. Science from Sight to Insight: How Scientists Illustrate Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2014.
24. Winn WL. Visualizing science: a semiotic analysis of visual representations in ornithology journals, 1859-2003. Dissertation, Communication Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 2007.
25. Barton BF, Barton MS. Modes of power in technical and professional visuals. J Bus Tech Commun 1993, 7:138-162.
26. Haraway DJ. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan(c)_Meets_OncoMouseTM: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge; 1997.
27. Kimball M. London through rose-colored graphics: visual rhetoric and information graphic design in Charles Booth's maps of London poverty. J Tech Writ Commun 2006, 36:353-381.
28. Brasseur LE. Visualizing Technical Information: A Cultural Critique. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing; 2003.
29. DeLuca KM. Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
30. Carter C. Rhetorical Exposures: Confrontation and Contradiction in US Social Documentary Photography. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press; 2015.
31. Enck-Wanzer D. Trashing the system: social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lords Organization's garbage offensive. Q J Speech 2006, 92:174-201.
32. Cisneros JD. (Re) bordering the civic imaginary: rhetoric, hybridity, and citizenship in La Gran Marcha. Q J Speech 2011, 97:26-49.
33. Northcut KM. The relevance of Feenberg's critical theory of technology to critical visual literacy: the case of scientific and technical illustrations. J Tech Writ Commun 2007, 37:253-266.
34. Reeves C. Scientific visuals, language, and the commercialization of a scientific idea: the strange case of the prion. Tech Commun Q 2011, 20:239-273.
35. Rosner M. Theories of visual rhetoric: looking at the human genome. J Tech Writ Comm 2001, 31:391-413.
36. Hill CA, Helmers MH. Defining Visual Rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004.
37. Walsh L. 'Tricks, ' hockey sticks, and the myth of natural inscription: how the visual rhetoric of Climategate conflated climate with character. In: Nocke T, Schneider B, eds. Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2014, 55-81.
38. Finnegan C. The naturalistic enthymeme and visual argument: photographic representation in the 'skull controversy.' Argument Advoc 2001, 37:133-149.
39. Doyle J. Seeing the climate? The problematic status of visual evidence in climate change campaigning. In: Dobrin S, Morey S, eds. Ecosee: Image, Rhetoric, and Nature. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2009, 279-298.
40. Besel RD. From awareness to action: the rhetorical limits of visualizing the irreparable nature of global climate change. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial Conference on Communication and the Environment, Chicago, IL, 2007
41. Walsh L. The technology of prophecy: the IPCC and climate change 2007. Scientists as Prophets: A Rhetorical Genealogy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013, 163-185.
42. Walker KC. Mapping the contours of translation: visualized uncertainties in the ozone hole controversy. Unpublished MS. 2015.
43. Cozen B. Mobilizing artists: Green Patriot posters, visual metaphors, and climate change activism. Environ Comm 2013, 7:297-314.
44. Prelli LJ. Introduction. In: Rhetorics of Display. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press; 2006, 1-38.
45. Endres D, Sprain L, Peterson TR, eds. Social Movement to Address Climate Change: Local Steps for Global Action. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press; 2009.
46. Oreskes N. The role of quantitative models in science. In: Canham CD, Cole JJ, Lauenroth WK, eds. The Role of Models in Ecosystem Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003, 13-31.
47. Mahony M, Hulme M. The color of risk: expert judgment and diagrammatic reasoning in the IPCC's 'Burning Embers.' In: Nocke T, Schneider B, eds. Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2014, 105-124.
48. Schneider B, Nocke T. Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2014.
49. Latour B. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2013, 59.