Rule based optimization for a bulk handling port operations

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 287-311

  Pratap, Saurabh ^a   Daultani, Yash ^b   Tiwari, M K ^a   Mahanty, Biswajit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

Author keywords

Bulk material handling port; Rake allocation; Rule based heuristic; Ship berthing; Stockyard allocation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT; OPTIMIZATION; SHIPS; UNLOADING;

BULK MATERIALS; RAKE ALLOCATION; RULE BASED; SHIP BERTHING; STOCKYARD ALLOCATION;

MATERIALS HANDLING;

EID: 84930813739     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1108-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Asperen, E. V., Dekker, R., & Polman, M. (2002). Allocation of ships in a port simulation. In Alexander Verbraeck, VH (Ed.) Proceedings 15th European simulation symposium, SCS European Council/SCS Europe BVBA, ISBN 3-936150-28-1 (book)/3-936150-29-X (CD) (2003).
2. Abdekhodaee, A., Dunstall, S., Ernst, A. T., & Lam, L. (2004). Integration of stockyard and rail network: A scheduling case study. In Proceedings of the fifth Asia Pacific industrial engineering and management systems conference.
3. Boland, N., Gulczynski, D., & Savelsbergh, M. (2012). A stockyard planning problem. European Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 1(3), 197–236.
4. Babu, S. A. K. I., Pratap, S., Lahoti, G., Fernandes, K. J., Tiwari, M. K., Mount, & Mand Xiong, Y. (2014). Minimizing delay of ships in bulk terminals by simultaneous ship scheduling, stockyard planning and train scheduling. Maritimes Economics and Logistic. doi:10.1057/mel.2014.20.
5. Gökdağ, H., & Yildiz, A. R. (2012). Structural damage detection using modal parameters and particle swarm optimization. Materials Testing, 54(6), 416–420.
6. Hani, Y., Amodeo, L., Yalaoui, F., & Chen, H. (2008). Simulation based optimization of a train maintenance facility. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19, 293–300.
7. Hosseini, S., & Al Khaled, A. (2014). A survey on the imperialist competitive algorithm metaheuristic: Implementation in engineering domain and directions for future research. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 1078–1094.
8. Imai, A., Zhang, J. T., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2007). The berth allocation problem with service time and delay time objectives. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 9, 269–290.
9. Liang, C., Hwang, H., & Gen, M. (2012). A berth allocation planning problem with direct transhipment consideration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 2207–2214.
10. Liang, C., Guo, J., & Yang, Y. (2011). Multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm for quay crane dynamic assignment in berth allocation planning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 471–479.
11. Liang, C., Li, M. M., Lu, B., Gu, T., Jo, J., & Ding, Y. (2015). Dynamic configuration of QC allocating problem based on multi-objective genetic algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1035-7.
12. Lee, Y., & Chen, C. (2009). An optimization heuristic for the berth scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 500–508.
13. Park, J. H., Kim, H. J., & Lee, C. (2009). Ubiquitous software controller to prevent deadlocks for automated guided vehicle systems in a container port terminal environment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 321–325.
14. Robenek, T., Umang, N., & Bierlaire, M., (2012). A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports. Report TRANSP-OR 120617, Transport and Mobility Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
15. Singh, G., David, S., Ernst, A. T., Gavriliouk, O., Oyston, R., Giles, T., et al. (2012). A mixed integer programming model for long term capacity expansion planning: A case study from The Hunter Valley Coal Chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1), 210–224.
16. Won, S. H., Zhang, X., & Kim, K. H. (2012). Workload-based yard-planning system in container terminals. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 2193–2206.
17. Wang, Y., & Kim, K. H. (2011). A quay crane scheduling algorithm considering the workload of yard cranes in a container yard. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 459–470.
18. Yildiz, A. R., & Saitou, K. (2011). Topology synthesis of multicomponent structural assemblies in continuum domains. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(1), 011008.
19. Yildiz, A. R. (2012a). A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for turning operations. Information Sciences, 210, 81–88.
20. Yildiz, A. R. (2012b). A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in the automotive industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 226(10), 1340–1351.
21. Yildiz, A. R., & Solanki, K. N. (2012). Multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness using a new particle swarm based approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 59(1–4), 367–376.
22. Yildiz, A. R. (2013a). Comparison of evolutionary-based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(1), 327–333.
23. Yildiz, A. R. (2013b). Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using hybrid teaching learning-based approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(9–12), 1319–1326.
24. Zhen, L. (2014). Container yard template planning under uncertain maritime market. Transportation Research Part E, 69, 199–217.
25. Zhen, L., Chew, E. P., & Lee, L. H. (2011). An integrated model for berth template and yard template planning in transshipment hubs. Transportation Science, 45(4), 483–504.
26. Zhen, L., Lee, L. H., & Chew, E. P. (2012). A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(1), 54–68.