Co-production of olefins, fuels, and electricity from conventional pipeline gas and shale gas with near-zero CO2 emissions. Part I: Process development and technical performance

Energies

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 3739-3761

  Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh ^a   Adams, Thomas A ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

CO2 capture; Gas to liquids; Gas to olefins; Methanol to olefins; Polygeneration

Indexed keywords

FUELS; GASES; METHANOL; OLEFINS; PIPELINES; SHALE; SHALE GAS;

GAS TO LIQUIDS; GAS-TO-OLEFINS; METHANOL TO OLEFIN; POLY-GENERATION; POLYGENERATION PROCESS; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE;

GAS EMISSIONS;

EID: 84930799308     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19961073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/en8053739     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bok, J.-K.; Lee, H.; Park, S. Robust investment model for long-range capacity expansion of chemical processing networks under uncertain demand forecast scenarios. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1998, 22, 1037-1049.
2. Adams, T.A., II. Challenges and opportunities in the design of new energy conversion systems. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2014, 34, 5-14.
3. 2 emissions and production costs. Energy 2008, 33, 817-833.
4. Benchaita, T. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Petrochemical Plants; Technical Note No. IDB-TN-562; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
5. Gao, L.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Jin, H.; Lin, R.; Hong, H. Proposal of a natural gas-based polygeneration system for power and methanol production. Energy 2008, 33, 206-212.
6. Zhang, X.; Gundersen, T.; Roussanaly, S.; Brunsvold, A.L.; Zhang, S. Carbon chain analysis on a coal IGCC-CCS system with flexible multi-products. Fuel Process. Technol. 2012, 108, 146-153.
7. Floudas, C.A.; Elia, J.A.; Baliban, R.C. Hybrid and single feedstock energy processes for liquid transportation fuels: A critical review. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 41, 24-51.
8. Adams, T.A., II; Barton, P.I. Combining coal gasification and natural gas reforming for efficient polygeneration. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 639-655.
9. 2 capture and sequestration. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 2105-2115.
10. Cormos, C.-C. Assessment of flexible energy vectors poly-generation based on coal and biomass/solid wastes co-gasification with carbon capture. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 7855-7866.
11. 2 emission. Appl. Energ. 2014, 133, 197-205.
12. 2 sources. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 16, 129-144.
13. Ju, F.; Chen, H.; Ding, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Dai, Z. Process simulation of single-step dimethyl ether production via biomass gasification. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 599-605.
14. Semelsberger, T.A.; Borup, R.L. Thermodynamic equilibrium calculations of hydrogen production from the combined processes of dimethyl ether steam reforming and partial oxidation. J. Power Sources 2006, 155, 340-352.
15. Semelsberger, T.A.; Borup, R.L.; Greene, H.L. Dimethyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel. J. Power Sources 2006, 156, 497-511.
16. Pyl, S.P.; Schietekat, C.M.; Reyniers, M.-F.; Abhari, R.; Marin, G.B.; van Geem, K.M. Biomass to olefins: Cracking of renewable naphtha. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 176-177, 178-187.
17. Rezaei, P.S.; Shafaghat, H.; Daud, W.M.A.W. Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic cracking of oxygenate compounds derived from biomass pyrolysis: A review. Appl. Catal. A 2014, 469, 490-511.
18. Kaminsky, W.; Schlesselmann, B.; Simon, C. Olefins from polyolefins and mixed plastics by pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1995, 32, 19-27.
19. Chen, C.C.; Mathias, P.M. Applied thermodynamics for process modeling. AlChE J. 2002, 48, 194-200.
20. Bullin, K.; Krouskop, P. Composition Variety Complicates Processing Plans for U.S. Shale Gas; Bryan Research and Engineering Inc.: Bryan, TX, USA, 2009.
21. Haslbeck, J.L.; Kuehn, N.J.; Lewis, E.G.; Pinkerton, L.L.; Simpson, J.; Turner, M.J.; Varghese, E.; Woods, M.C. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity; DOE, U.S. Department of Energy: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2010.
22. Adams, T.A., II; Barton, P.I. High-efficiency power production from natural gas with carbon capture. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 1971-1983.
23. 3 catalyst. J. Catal. 1996, 161, 1-10.
24. Bercic, G.; Levec, J. Catalytic dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether. Kinetic investigation and reactor simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 2478-2484.
25. Methanol Industrial Grade. Available online: http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/2012-Methanol-99-5-_551002733.html (accessed on 1 June 2014).
26. DiMethyl Ether. Available online: http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/DiMethyl-Ether_1659793013.html (accessed on 1 June 2014).
27. Khojasteh Salkuyeh, Y.; Adams, T.A., II. A new power, methanol, and DME polygeneration process using integrated chemical looping systems. Energy Convers. Manage. 2014, 88, 411-425.
28. Taheri Najafabadi, A.; Fatemi, S.; Sohrabi, M.; Salmasi, M. Kinetic modeling and optimization of the operating condition of MTO process on SAPO-34 catalyst. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18, 29-37.
29. Lee, Y.-J.; Baek, S.-C.; Jun, K.-W. Methanol conversion on SAPO-34 catalysts prepared by mixed template method. Appl. Catal., A 2007, 329, 130-136.
30. Chen, J.Q.; Bozzano, A.; Glover, B.; Fuglerud, T.; Kvisle, S. Recent advancements in ethylene and propylene production using the UOP/Hydro MTO process. Catal. Today 2005, 106, 103-107.
31. Wilson, S.; Barger, P. The characteristics of SAPO-34 which influence the conversion of methanol to light olefins. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 29, 117-126.
32. Bell, D.A.; Towler, B.F.; Fan, M. Coal Gasification and Its Applications; William Andrew Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 2011.
33. GPSA. Engineering Data Book, 11th ed.; Gas Processors Suppliers Association: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1998.
34. Ethylene, Polymer Purity. Available online: https://www.mathesongas.com/pdfs/products/Ethylene-Pure-Gas.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2014).
35. Propylene, Polymer Grade. Available online: http://www.dow.com/productsafety/finder/pro.htm (accessed on 1 June 2014).
36. Keil, F.J. Methanol-to-hydrocarbons: process technology. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 29, 49-66.
37. Bahadori, A.; Mokhatab, S. Estimating design parameters in propane refrigerant systems. Pumps Systems 2007, 68-71.
38. Mafi, M.; Amidpour, M.; Naeynian, S.M.M. Development in mixed refrigerant cycles used in olefin plants. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Gas Processing Symposium; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2009; pp. 154-161.
39. 2 capture from power plants: Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2007, 1, 135-142.
40. Moghtaderi, B. Review of the recent chemical looping process developments for novel energy and fuel applications. Energy Fuels 2011, 26, 15-40.
41. 2 capture using oxygen enhanced combustion strategies for natural gas power plants. Fuel 2002, 81, 1007-1016.
42. Jin, H.; Ishida, M. A novel gas turbine cycle with hydrogen-fueled chemical-looping combustion. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25, 1209-1215.
43. 4 particle circulation at 1200 °C. Energy Convers. Manag. 2002, 43, 1469-1478.
44. Wilcock, R.C.; Young, J.B.; Horlock, J.H. The Effect of Turbine Blade Cooling on the Cycle Efficiency of Gas Turbine Power Cycles. J Eng. Gas Turb. Power. 2005, 127, 109-120.
45. Young, J.B.; Wilcock, R.C. Modeling the Air-Cooled Gas Turbine: Part 2-Coolant Flows and Losses. J. Turbomach. 2002, 124, 214-221.
46. Zhang, J.; Ma, L.; Li, Z.; Ni, W. Modeling an Air-Cooled Gas Turbine of the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle in Aspen plus. In International Conference on Future Electrical Power and Energy Systems (ICFEPES); Elsevier Ltd.: Sanya, China, 2012; Volume 9, pp. 425-430.
47. 2 capture from power plants: Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2007, 1, 37-46.
48. Mackenzie, D.H.; Prambil, F.C.; Daniels, C.A.; Bullin, J.A. Design & operation of a selective sweetening plant using MDEA. Energy Progress 1987, 7, 31-36.
49. 2 capture from oxy-fuel combustion power plants. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.
50. Smith, A.R.; Klosek, J. A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2001, 70, 115-134.
51. Fan, L.S. Chemical Looping Systems For Fossil Energy Conversions; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010.
52. Kolbitsch, P.; Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, J.; Pröll, T.; Hofbauer, H. Operating experience with chemical looping combustion in a 120 kW dual circulating fluidized bed (DCFB) unit. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2010, 4, 180-185.
53. Kolbitsch, P.; Pröll, T.; Bolhar-Nordenkampf, J.; Hofbauer, H. Design of a Chemical Looping Combustor using a Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed (DCFB) Reactor System. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32, 398-403.
54. 2 capture in power generation. Fuel 2005, 84, 993-1006.
55. 2 capture with Monoethyl and Diethyl Amines using Aspen Plus. Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng. 2013, 3, 490-497.
56. 2 capture. Energy 2010, 35, 851-857.
57. Polasek, J.; Bullin, J. Selecting amines for sweetening units. Energy Prog. 1984, 4, 146-149.
58. Manning, F.S.; Thompson, R.E. Oilfield Processing of Petroleum Volume 1: Natural Gas. Pennwell Books: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1991.
59. Toftegaard, M.B.; Brix, J.; Jensen, P.A.; Glarborg, P.; Jensen, A.D. Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 581-625.
60. Tigges, K.; Klauke, F.; Bergins, C.; Busekrus, K.; Niesbach, J.; Ehmann, M.; Vollmer, B.; Buddenberg, T.; Wu, S.; Kukoski, A. Oxyfuel combustion retrofits for existing power stations. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Clearwater, FL, USA, 1-5 June 2008; Sahkestad, B.A., Ed; Coal Technologies Associates: Red Hook, NY, USA.
61. Hong, J.; Chaudhry, G.; Brisson, J.G.; Field, R.; Gazzino, M.; Ghoniem, A.F. Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle utilizing a pressurized coal combustor. Energy 2009, 34, 1332-1340.
62. Cho, P.; Mattisson, T.; Lyngfelt, A. Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper-and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion. Fuel 2004, 83, 1215-1225.
63. Adanez, J.; Abad, A.; Garcia-Labiano, F.; Gayan, P.; de Diego, L.F. Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 215-282.
64. Corbella, B.M.; Palacios, J.M. Titania-supported iron oxide as oxygen carrier for chemical-looping combustion of methane. Fuel 2007, 86, 113-122.
65. Lyngfelt, A. Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion-4000 h of Operational Experience. Oil Gas Sci. Technol.-Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 2011, 66, 161-172.
66. Linderholm, C.; Abad, A.; Mattisson, T.; Lyngfelt, A. 160 h of chemical-looping combustion in a 10 kW reactor system with a NiO-based oxygen carrier. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2008, 2, 520-530.
67. 3 oxygen carrier for a SR-CLC system in a continuous CLC unit. Fuel Process. Technol. 2012, 96, 37-47.