Academic peer pressure in social media: Experiences from the heavy, the targeted and the restricted user

First Monday

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Kieslinger, Barbara ^a  

^a Centre for Social Innovation   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930792655     PISSN: 13960466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v20i6.5854     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Sophie K. Acord and Diane Harley, 2013. "Credit, time and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0," New Media & Society, volume 15, number 3, pp. 379-397. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465140, accessed 27 November 2014.
2. American Society for Cell Biology, 2012. "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment: Putting science into the assessment of research," at http://www.ascb.org/dora-old/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf, accessed 30 January 2015.
3. Yair Amichai-Hamburger and Gideon Vinitzky, 2010. "Social network use and personality," Computers in Human Behavior, volume 26, number 6, pp. 1,289-1,295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018, accessed 30 January 2015.
4. Deborah Lines Andersen (editor), 2004. Digital scholarship in the tenure, promotion, and review process. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
5. Kim Barbour and David Marshall, 2012. "Constructing persona through the World Wide Web," First Monday, volume 17, number 9, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3969/3292, accessed 30 January 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3969, accessed 27 May 2015.
6. Ingrid Bergner, 2010. "Internet communication and practices of scientists in the academic world" (dissertation, Fernuniversität Hagen, Hagen, Germany), at http://deposit.fernuni-hagen.de/2766/ accessed 9 September 2014.
7. danah boyd, 2002. "Faceted ID/entity: Managing representation in a digital world," Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at http://smg.media.mit.edu/people/danah/thesis/, accessed 27 May 2015.
8. Kathy Charmaz, 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
9. Alan Cooper, 2004. The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, Ind.: Sams.
10. Cristina Isabel Costa, 2013. "The participatory Web in the context of academic research: Landscapes of change and conflicts" (Ph.D. thesis, University, of Salford, England), at http://usir.salford.ac.uk/28369/, accessed 27 May 2015.
11. Lilia Efimova, 2009. Passion at work: Blogging practices of knowledge workers. Enschede, Netherlands: Novay, and at http://blog.mathemagenic.com/phd/dissertation/, accessed 27 May 2015.
12. European Commission, 2014. "Public consultation: 'Science 2.0': Science in transition," at http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/science-2.0/background.pdf, accessed 30 January 2015.
13. Shamal Faily and Ivan Flechais, 2011. "Persona cases: A technique for grounding personas," CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2,267-2,270. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979274 accessed 30 January 2015.
14. Erving Goffman, 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
15. Gabriela Grosseck and Carmen Holotescu, 2011. "Academic research in 140 characters or less," paper presented at the Seventh International Scientific Conference 'eLearning and Software for Education' (Bucharest), at https://adlunap.ro/else_publications/papers/2011/1590_1.pdf, accessed 9 September 2014.
16. Diane Harley, 2013. "Scholarly communication: Cultural context, evolving models," Science, volume 342, number 6154 (4 October), pp. 80-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1243622, accessed 27 May 2015.
17. Diane Harley and Sophia K. Acord, 2011. "Peer review in academic promotion and publishing: Its meaning, locus, and future," Berkeley: University of California Center for Studies in Higher Education, at http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/peer-review-academic-promotion-and-publishing-its-meaning-locus-and-future, accessed 27 May 2015.
18. Diane Harley, Sophia Krzys Acord, Sarah Earl-Novell, Shannon Lawrence, and C. Judson King, 2010. "Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines," Berkeley: University of California Center for Studies in Higher Education, at http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc, accessed 30 January 2015.
19. Martin Johansson and Jörn Messeter, 2005. "Present-ing the user: Constructing the persona," Digital Creativity, volume 16, number 4, pp. 231-243. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14626260500476606, accessed 27 May 2015.
20. Sara Kjellberg, 2010. "I am a blogging researcher: Motivations for blogging in a scholarly context," First Monday, volume 15, number 8, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2962/2580, accessed 30 January 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i8.2962, accessed 27 May 2015.
21. Uwe Matzat, 2009. "Quality of information in academic e-mailing lists," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 60, number 9, pp. 1,859-1,870. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21105, accessed 27 May 2015.
22. Amy Mollett, Danielle Moran, and Patrick Dunleavy, 2011. "Using Twitter in university research, teaching and impact activities: A guide for academics and researchers," London: LSE Public Policy Group, at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/files/2011/11/Published-Twitter_Guide_Sept_2011.pdf, accessed 30 January 2015.
23. Mike Moran, Jeff Seaman, and Hester Tinti-Kane, 2012. "Blogs, wikis, podcasts and Facebook: How today's higher education faculty use social media," Boston: Pearson, at http://www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/pearson-social-media-survey-2012-color.pdf, accessed 30 January 2015.
24. Mike Moran, Jeff Seaman, and Hester Tinti-Kane, 2011. "Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today's higher education faculty use social media," Boston: Pearson, at http://www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/educators/pearson-social-media-survey-2011-bw.pdf, accessed 30 January 2015.
25. Michael Nentwich, 2010. "Cyberscience 1.2 - Web 2.0 and academia," paper presented at Ninth IAS-STS Annual Conference, 'Critical issues in science and technology studies' (Graz, Austria).
26. Michael Nentwich, 2009. "Cyberscience 2.0 oder 1.2? Das Web 2.0 und die Zukunft der Wissenschaft [Cyberscience 2.0 or 1.2? Web 2.0 and the future of science]," ITA Newsletter (December), at http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-manuscript/ita_09_02.pdf, accessed 30 January 2015.
27. Michael Nentwich and René König, 2012. Cyberscience 2.0: Research in the age of digital social networks. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Verlag.
28. Berk özler and David McKenzie, 2011. "The impact of economics blogs" [blog post], originally at http://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/working-paper-the-impact-of-economics-blogs, accessed 20 February 2013; archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6EZvf2XPG, accessed 27 May 2015.
29. Zizi Papacharissi, 2013. "A networked self: Identity performance and sociability on social network sites," In: Francis L.F. Lee, Louis Leung, Jack Linchuan Qiu, and Donna S. C. Chu (editors). Frontiers in new media research. New York: Routledge, pp. 209-221.
30. Erika Pearson, 2009. "All the World Wide Web's a stage: The performance of identity in online social networks," First Monday, volume 14, number 3, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2162/2127, accessed 30 January 2015.
31. Alberto Pepe, Spencer Wolff, and Karen Van Godtsenhoven, 2012. "One, none and one hundred thousand profiles," First Monday, volume 17, number 4, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3918/3191, accessed 30 January 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i4.3918, accessed 27 May 2015.
32. Marc Prensky, 2001. "Digital natives, digital immigrants," On the Horizon, volume 9, number 5, pp. 1-6, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816, accessed 30 January 2015.
33. Jason Priem and Bradley M. Hemminger, 2010. "Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web," First Monday, volume 15, number 7, at http://firstmonday.org/article/viewArticle/2874/2570, accessed 30 January 2015.
34. Rob Procter, Robin Williams, and James Stewart, 2010. "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0," London: Research Information Network (RIN), at http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/56246/ accessed 31 March 2013.
35. Ian Rowlands, David Nicholas, Bill Russell, Nicholas Canty and Anthony Watkinson, 2011. "Social media use in the research workflow," Learned Publishing, volume 24, number 3, pp. 183-195. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110306, accessed 30 January 2015.
36. David Silverman, 2006. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. Third edition. London: Sage.
37. David Stuart, 2009. "Web 2.0 fails to excite today's researchers," Research Information (October/November), at http://www.researchinformation.info/features/feature.php?feature_id=236, accessed 30 January 2015.
38. Jessica Vitak, 2012. "The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures," Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, volume 56, number 4, pp. 451-470. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732140, accessed 27 May 2015.
39. Martin Weller, 2012. "The virtues of blogging as scholarly activity," Chronicle of Higher Education (29 April), at http://chronicle.com/article/The-Virtues-of-Blogging-as/131666/, accessed 30 January 2015.
40. Martin Weller, 2011. The digital scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice. London: Bloomsbury. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849666275, accessed 26 May 2015.
41. David S. White and Alison Le Cornu, 2011. "Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement," First Monday, volume 16, number 9, at http://firstmonday.org/article/viewArticle/3171/3049, accessed 30 January 2015.
42. Meinrad Ziegler, 1998. "'Dichte Beschreibung' - Essayistisches Theoretisieren und persönlicher Standort in der Interpretation [Thick description - essayistic theorizing and personal stands in interpretation], In: Exemplarische Erkenntnis: Zehn Beiträge zur interpretativen Erforschung sozialer Wirklichkeit. Innsbruck, Austria: Studien Verlag, pp. 65-91.