Approaches to gender mainstreaming: What’s the problem represented to be?

Mainstreaming Politics: Gendering Practices and Feminist Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 111-138

  Bacchi, Carol ^a   Eveline, Joan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930753349     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/UPO9780980672381.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Altman, J. and Hinkson, M. (eds) 2007. Coercive reconciliation: Stabilise, normalise, exit Aboriginal Australia. North Carlton, Melbourne: Arena Publications.
2. Annfelt, T. 2008. ‘From soft fathers to the rights of the sperm? Biologism as a heteronorming resource’, in Magnusson, E., Rönnblom, M. and Silius, H. (eds) Critical studies of gender equalities: Nordic dislocations, dilemmas and contradictions. Göteborg: Makadam Publishers.
3. Armstrong, P. 2002. ‘Speaking notes’, Public consultations of the Commission on the Future of Health Care, 30 May, Toronto, Ontario. accessed 1 November 2009.
4. Australian Government. 2002. Intergenerational report 2002–2003, Budget paper no. 5. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
5. Bacchi, C. 1990. Same difference: Feminism and sexual difference. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
6. Bacchi, C. 1996. The politics of affirmative action: ‘Women, equality and category politics. London: Sage.
7. Bacchi, C. 1999. Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.
8. Bacchi, C. 2004. ‘Policy and discourse: Challenging the construction of affirmative action as preferential treatment’, Journal of European Public Policy 11 (1): 128–46.
9. Bacchi, C. 2005. ‘Affirmative action for men: A test of common sense?’, Just Policy 36 (June): 5–12.
10. Bacchi, C. 2009a. Analysingpolicy: What’s the problem represented to be? French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.
11. Bacchi, C. 2009b. ‘Challenging the displacement of affirmative action by gender mainstreaming’, Asian Journal of Womens Studies 15 (4): 7–29.
12. Bastalich, W. ‘Politicizing the Productive: Subjectivity, Feminist Labour Thought and Foucault’. PhD thesis, Departments of Politics and Social Inquiry, University of Adelaide.
13. Beasley, C. and Bacchi, C. 2007. ‘Envisaging a new politics for an ethical future: Beyond trust, care and generosity—towards an ethic of “social flesh”’, Feminist Theory 8 (3): 279–98.
14. Burr, V. 2003. Social constructionism, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
15. Burton, C. 1987. ‘Merit and gender: Organisations and the mobilisation of masculine bias’, Australian Journal of Social Issues 22 (2): 424–435.
16. Connolly, W.E. 1995. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Crawley, M. and O’Meara, L. 2002. Gender proofing handbook. Dublin: NDP Gender Equality Unit.
18. Crawley, M. and O’Meara, L. 2004. Gender impact assessment handbook. Belfast: Gender Equality Unit.
19. Davies, B. 1994. Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Geelong: Deakin University.
20. Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
21. Dean, M. 2006. ‘Governmentality and powers of life and death’, in Marston, G. & McDonald, C. (eds) Analysing social policy: A governmental approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
22. European Commission 1998. A guide to gender impact assessment. Employment & social affairs, Equality between women and men. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications for the European Communities.
23. Eveline, J. 1994. ‘The politics of advantage’, Australian Feminist Studies. Special issue: Women and citizenship 19: 129–54.
24. Eveline, J. 2004. Ivory basement leadership: Power and invisibility in the changing university. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press.
25. Foucault, M. 1980 [1977]. ‘Truth and power’, in Gordon, C. (ed.) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977/Michel Foucault. Trans. C. Gordon & others. Sussex: Harvester Press.
26. Fulcher, G. 1989. Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability. East Sussex: The Falmer Press.
27. Gatens, M. 1995. Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power and corporeality. London: Routledge.
28. Hill Collins, P. 1999. ‘Moving beyond gender: intersectionality and scientific knowledge’, in Ferree, M.M., Lorber, J. and Hess, B.B. (eds) Revisioninggender. London: Sage.
29. Honkanen, K. 2008. ‘Equality politics out of the subaltern’, in Magnusson, E., Rönnblom, M. and Silius, H. (eds) Critical studies of gender equalities: Nordic dislocations, dilemmas and contradictions. Göteborg: Makadam Publishers.
30. Jahan, R. 1995. The elusive agenda: Mainstreaming women in development. London: Zed Books.
31. Lee, C. 2004. ‘Australian women facing the future: Is the Intergenerational Report gender–neutral?’ Dialogue 23 (3): 53–56.
32. Magnusson, E., Rönnblom, M. and Silius, H. (eds) 2008. Critical studies of gender equalities: Nordic dislocations, dilemmas and contradictions. Göteborg: Makadam Publishers.
33. March, C., Smyth, I. and Mukhopadhyay, M. (eds) 1999. A guide to gender–analysis frameworks. Oxford: Oxfam.
34. Marston, G. and McDonald, C. 2006. ‘Introduction: Reframing social policy analysis’, in Marston, G. and McDonald, C. (eds) Analysing social policy: A governmental approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
35. Massumi, B. 2002. From parables to the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
36. MWA (Ministry of Women’s Affairs). 2001. Gender–based policy analysis: A resource for policy analysts. Auckland: MWA.
37. Plantenga, J. 2000. ‘Gender impact assessment and the employment strategy: The case of the Netherlands’. External report commissioned and presented to the European Commission. accessed 22 October 2009.
38. Polverari, L. and Fitzgerald, R. 2002a. Integrating gender equality in the evaluation of the Irish 200006 National Development Plan, vol. I: Background concepts and methods. Glasgow: NDP Gender Equality Unit, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
39. Polverari, L. and Fitzgerald, R. 2002b. Integrating gender equality in the evaluation of the Irish 200006 National Development Plan, vol. II: Tool kit for gender evaluation. Glasgow: NDP Gender Equality Unit, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
40. Rees, T. 1998. Mainstreaming equality in the European Union: Education, training and labour market policies. London: Routledge.
41. Roggeband, C. and Verloo, M. 2006. ‘Evaluating gender impact assessment in the Netherlands (1994–2004): A political process approach’, Policy & Politics 34 (4): 615–32.
42. Rönnblom, M. 2008. ‘De–politicizing gender? Constructions of gender equality in Swedish regional policy’, in Magnusson, E., Rönnblom, M. and Silius, H. (eds) Critical studies of gender equalities: Nordic dislocations, dilemmas and contradictions. Göteborg: Makadam Publishers.
43. Shapiro, M. J. 1988. The politics of representation: Writing practices, photography and policy analysis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
44. Smith, M. and Ewer, P. 2001. Changes to childcare funding and women’s labour force participation in Western Sydney, WSROC (Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils), Blacktown, NSW. accessed 1 November 2009.
45. Tanesini, A. 1994. ‘Whose language?’, in Lennon, K. & Whitford, M. (eds) Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology. New York: Routledge.
46. Verloo, M. 2000. ‘Making women count in the Netherlands’, in Beveridge, F., Nott, S. and Stephen, K. (eds) Making women count: Integrating gender into law and policy–making. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
47. Verloo, M. 2001. ‘Another velvet revolution? Gender mainstreaming and the politics of implementation’, IWM workingpaper no. 5/2001. Vienna: Institute of Human Sciences (IWM).
48. Verloo, M. 2005. ‘Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe: A critical frame analysis approach’, The Greek Journal of Social Research 117, B’: 11–34.
49. Verloo, M. and Roggeband, C. 1996. ‘Gender impact assessment: The development of a new instrument in the Netherlands’, Impact Assessment 14 (1): 3–31.
50. Woodward, A. and Meier, P. 1997. ‘Gender impact assessment: Tool in mainstreaming or tool to begin mainstreaming? A comparison of Dutch and Flemish approaches’. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, Bern, 27 February – 3 March.
51. World Bank. 2002. Integrating Gender into the World Bank’s work: A strategy for action. accessed 21 October 2009.