The role of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1898-1906

  Lee, Jeong Won ^a   Cho, Arthur ^a   Lee, Jae Hoon ^a   Yun, Mijin ^a   Lee, Jong Doo ^a   Kim, Young Tae ^a   Kang, Won Jun ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET; Metabolic tumor volume; Ovarian cancer; Prognosis; Total lesion glycolysis

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; FEMALE; GLYCOLYSIS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; OVARY TUMOR; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; SCINTISCANNING;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; GLYCOLYSIS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84930730413     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: 16197089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2803-x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.
2. Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95 Suppl 1:S161–92.
3. Tingulstad S, Skjeldestad FE, Halvorsen TB, Hagen B. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:885–91.
4. Bachmann C, Bachmann S, Fehm T, Staebler A, Becker S, Rothmund R, et al. Nodal status–its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:261–7.
5. Brun JL, Feyler A, Chene G, Saurel J, Brun G, Hocke C. Long-term results and prognostic factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:21–7.
6. Makar AP, Baekelandt M, Trope CG, Kristensen GB. The prognostic significance of residual disease, FIGO substage, tumor histology, and grade in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:175–80.
7. Mury D, Woelber L, Jung S, Eulenburg C, Choschzick M, Witzel I, et al. Prognostic and predictive relevance of CA-125 at primary surgery of ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1131–7.
8. Winter 3rd WE, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3621–7.
9. Winter 3rd WE, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Sundborg MJ, Rose GS, Rose PG, et al. Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:83–9.
10. Hynninen J, Kemppainen J, Lavonius M, Virtanen J, Matomaki J, Oksa S, et al. A prospective comparison of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT for pretreatment imaging of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131:389–94.
11. Kim C, Chung HH, Oh SW, Kang KW, Chung JK, Lee DS. Differential diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors from stage I malignant ovarian tumors using FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;47:81–8.
12. Kitajima K, Suzuki K, Senda M, Kita M, Nakamoto Y, Onishi Y, et al. FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:549–53.
13. Kitajima K, Ueno Y, Suzuki K, Kita M, Ebina Y, Yamada H, et al. Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT scans for diagnosing ovarian cancer recurrence. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3557–62.
14. Martoni AA, Fanti S, Zamagni C, Rosati M, De Iaco P. D’Errico Grigioni A, et al. [18 F] FDG-PET/CT monitoring early identifies advanced ovarian cancer patients who will benefit from prolonged neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;55:81–90.
15. Risum S, Loft A, Engelholm SA, Hogdall E, Berthelsen AK, Nedergaard L, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography predictors of overall survival in stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:1163–9.
16. Risum S, Hogdall C, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Hogdall E, Nedergaard L, et al. Does the use of diagnostic PET/CT cause stage migration in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:395–8.
17. Nakamura K, Hongo A, Kodama J, Hiramatsu Y. The pretreatment of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the primary tumor is predictor for poor prognosis for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Acta Med Okayama. 2012;66:53–60.
18. Kurosaki H, Oriuchi N, Okazaki A, Tamaki T, Uki A, Izuta M, et al. Prognostic value of FDG-PET in patients with ovarian carcinoma following surgical treatment. Ann Nucl Med. 2006;20:171–4.
19. Hyun SH, Ahn HK, Kim H, Ahn MJ, Park K, Ahn YC, et al. Volume-based assessment by F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:50–8.
20. Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, Min JJ, Song HC, Kim YC, et al. Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18 F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:925–35.
21. Ryu IS, Kim JS, Roh JL, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Choi SH, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis measured by 18 F-FDG PET/CT in salivary gland carcinomas. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1032–8.
22. Yoo J, Choi JY, Moon SH, Bae DS, Park SB, Choe YS, et al. Prognostic significance of volume-based metabolic parameters in uterine cervical cancer determined using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:1226–33.
23. Chung HH, Kwon HW, Kang KW, Park NH, Song YS, Chung JK, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1966–72.
24. Liao S, Lan X, Cao G, Yuan H, Zhang Y. Prognostic Predictive Value of Total Lesion Glycolysis From 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Post-Surgical Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:715–20.
25. Fonti R, Larobina M, Del Vecchio S, De Luca S, Fabbricini R, Catalano L, et al. Metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1829–35.
26. Uto F, Shiba E, Onoue S, Yoshimura H, Takada M, Tsuji Y, et al. Phantom study on radiotherapy planning using PET/CT–delineation of GTV by evaluating SUV. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:157–64.
27. Lim R, Eaton A, Lee NY, Setton J, Ohri N, Rao S, et al. 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1506–13.
28. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Fukasawa I, Inaba N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1912–20.
29. Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, Ghi T, Farsad M, Nanni C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:589–95.
30. Sanli Y, Turkmen C, Bakir B, Iyibozkurt C, Ozel S, Has D, et al. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:509–15.
31. du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;115:1234–44.
32. Zhang H, Wroblewski K, Liao S, Kampalath R, Penney BC, Zhang Y, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18) F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:32–40.
33. Yoon HJ, Paeng JC, Kwak C, Park YH, Kim TM, Lee SH, et al. Prognostic implication of extrarenal metabolic tumor burden in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy after nephrectomy. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:748–55.
34. Lee SJ, Choi JY, Lee HJ, Baek CH, Son YI, Hyun SH, et al. Prognostic value of volume-based (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT parameters in patients with clinically node-negative oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13:752–9.
35. Hyun SH, Choi JY, Kim K, Kim J, Shim YM, Um SW, et al. Volume-based parameters of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improve outcome prediction in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2013;257:364–70.
36. Prat J. Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch. 2012;460:237–49.