Critical reading of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about diagnostic imaging;Lectura crítica de revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis en el diagnóstico por imagen

Radiologia

Volumn 57, Issue , 2015, Pages 23-30

  Plana, M N ^a   Zamora, J ^b   Abraira, V ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Especificidad; Metan lisis; Palabras clave Revisi n sistem tica; Sensibilidad; Validez

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); VALIDITY; HUMAN; LITERATURE; PUBLICATION; RADIOLOGY; READING;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RADIOLOGY; READING; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84930726252     PISSN: 00338338     EISSN: 15781771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2015.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español (CASPE) [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.redcaspe.org/.
2. Centre for evidence-based medicine (CEBM) [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.cebm.net.
3. P.M. Bossuyt, L. Irwig, J. Craig, and P. Glasziou Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways BMJ. 332 2006 1089 1092
4. V. Garcia-Blazquez, A. Vicente-Bartulos, A. Olavarria-Delgado, M.N. Plana, D. van der Winden, and J. Zamora Accuracy of CT angiography in the diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Radiol. 23 2013 1181 1190
5. L. Velauthar, M.N. Plana, M. Kalidindi, J. Zamora, B. Thilaganathan, S.E. Illanes, and et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 43 2014 500 507
6. M.N. Plana, C. Carreira, A. Muriel, M. Chiva, V. Abraira, J.I. Emparanza, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis Eur Radiol. 22 2012 26 38
7. J.G. Lijmer, B.W. Mol, S. Heisterkamp, G.J. Bonsel, M.H. Prins, J.H. van der Meulen, and et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests JAMA. 282 1999 1061 1066
8. A.W. Rutjes, J.B. Reitsma, N.M. Di, N. Smidt, J.C. van Rijn, and P.M. Bossuyt Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies CMAJ. 174 2006 469 476
9. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://editorial-unit.cochrane.org/mecir.
10. BIOSIS database [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.biosis.org.
11. MEDION Database [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.mediondatabase.nl/.
12. ARIF databases [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.mediondatabase.nl/.
13. Health Technology Assessment Database [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com.
14. Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.york.ac.uk.
15. M.M. Leeflang, P.M. Bossuyt, and L. Irwig Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis J Clin Epidemiol. 62 2009 5 12
16. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Searching for studies. Chapter 6. En: Higgins JPT, Green S, editores. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5 1 0 (updated March 2011) The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: www.cochrane-handbook org.
17. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) [acceso octubre 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/.
18. M.M. Leeflang, R.J. Scholten, A.W. Rutjes, J.B. Reitsma, and P.M. Bossuyt Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies J Clin Epidemiol. 59 2006 234 240
19. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P.C. Gøtzsche, J.P. Ioannidis, and et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ. 339 2009 b2700
20. P.F. Whiting, A.W. Rutjes, M.E. Westwood, S. Mallett, J.J. Deeks, J.B. Reitsma, and et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool or the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies Ann Intern Med. 155 2011 529 536
21. P. Whiting, R. Harbord, and J. Kleijnen No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies BMC Med Res Methodol. 5 2005 19
22. P.F. Whiting, J.A. Sterne, M.E. Westwood, L.M. Bachmann, R. Harbord, M. Egger, and et al. Graphical presentation of diagnostic information BMC Med Res Methodol. 8 2008 20
23. J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios BMJ. 329 2004 168 169
24. A.S. Glas, J.G. Lijmer, M.H. Prins, G.J. Bonsel, and P.M. Bossuyt The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance J Clin Epidemiol. 56 2003 1129 1135
25. M.N. Plana, V. Abraira, and J. Zamora An Introduction to Diagnostic Meta-analysis A.R. Suhail, G.M. Williams, Methods of Clinical Epidemiology. 2013 Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health. Berlin: Heidelberg 103 120
26. S.D. Walter The partial area under the summary ROC curve Stat Med. 24 2005 2025 2040
27. L.E. Moses, D. Shapiro, and B. Littenberg Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations Stat Med. 12 1993 1293 1316
28. R.M. Harbord, P. Whiting, J.A. Sterne, M. Egger, J.J. Deeks, A. Shang, and et al. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary J Clin Epidemiol. 61 2008 1095 1103
29. J.B. Reitsma, A.S. Glas, A.W. Rutjes, R.J. Scholten, P.M. Bossuyt, and A.H. Zwinderman Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews J Clin Epidemiol. 58 2005 982 990
30. C.M. Rutter, and C.A. Gatsonis A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations Stat Med. 20 2001 2865 2884
31. M.M. Leeflang, J.J. Deeks, A.W. Rutjes, J.B. Reitsma, and P.M. Bossuyt Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity J Clin Epidemiol. 65 2012 1088 1097
32. J.J. Deeks, P. Macaskill, and L. Irwig The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed J Clin Epidemiol. 58 2005 882 893
33. C.B. Begg Publication bias J.H.L. Cooper, The Handbook of Research Synthesis. 1994 Sage Foundation New York
34. M. Egger, S.G. Davey, M. Schneider, and C. Minder Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ. 315 1997 629 634
35. H.J. Schunemann, A.D. Oxman, J. Brozek, P. Glasziou, R. Jaeschke, G.E. Vist, and et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies BMJ. 336 2008 1106 1110