Heart rate is associated with progression of atrial fibrillation, independent of rhythm

Heart

Volumn 101, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 894-899

  Holmqvist, Fredrik ^a   Kim, Sunghee ^a   Steinberg, Benjamin A ^a   Reiffel, James A ^b   Mahaffey, Kenneth W ^c   Gersh, Bernard J ^d   Fonarow, Gregg C ^e   Naccarelli, Gerald V ^f   Chang, Paul ^g   Freeman, James V ^h   Kowey, Peter R ⁱ   Thomas, Laine ^a   Peterson, Eric D ^a   Piccini, Jonathan P ^a  

^a DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^h YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ LANKENAU HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CARDIOVERSION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM ENLARGEMENT; HEART FAILURE; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84930646865     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307043     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2369-429.
2. Wijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R, et al. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 1995;92:1954-68.
3. Allessie M, Ausma J, Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 2002;54:230-46.
4. Kerr CR, Humphries KH, Talajic M, et al. Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after the initial diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 2005;149:489-96.
5. Jahangir A, Lee V, Friedman PA, et al. Long-term progression and outcomes with aging in patients with lone atrial fibrillation: a 30-year follow-up study. Circulation 2007;115:3050-6.
6. de Vos CB, Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, et al. Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:725-31.
7. Camm AJ, Breithardt G, Crijns H, et al. Real-life observations of clinical outcomes with rhythm- and rate-control therapies for atrial fibrillation RECORDAF. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:493-501.
8. De Vos CB, Breithardt G, Camm AJ, et al. Progression of atrial fibrillation in the REgistry on Cardiac rhythm disORDers assessing the control of Atrial Fibrillation cohort: clinical correlates and the effect of rhythm-control therapy. Am Heart J 2012;163:887-93.
9. Zhang YY, Qiu C, Davis PJ, et al. Predictors of Progression of Recently Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in REgistry on Cardiac Rhythm DisORDers Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation (RecordAF)-United States Cohort. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:79-84.
10. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825-33.
11. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1834-40.
12. Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation 2004;109:1509-13.
13. Piccini JP, Fraulo ES, Ansell JE, et al. Outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of ORBIT-AF. Am Heart J 2011;162:606-12.e1.
14. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:632-96.e21.
15. Enders CK. Applied missing data analysis. New York; London: Guilford, 2010.
16. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York; Chichester: Wiley, 1987.
17. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk strati fication for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 2010;137:263-72.
18. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, et al. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fi brillation. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1363-73.
19. Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identi fied by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA 2014;311:498-506.