Erratum: Mapping and characterizing selected canopy tree species at the angkor world heritage site in cambodia using aerial data (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:4 (E0121558) 10.1371/journal.pone.0121558);Mapping and characterizing selected canopy tree species at the Angkor world heritage site in Cambodia using aerial data

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Singh, Minerva ^a   Evans, Damian ^b   Tan, Boun Suy ^c   Nin, Chan Samean ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Angkor International Research and Documentation Center   (Cambodia)

^d APSARA National Authority   (Cambodia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAMBODIA; CANOPY; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PLANT PARAMETERS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TREE; TREE CROWN; TREE CROWN HEIGHT; TREE HEIGHT; CLASSIFICATION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; PROCEDURES; REMOTE SENSING; UNITED NATIONS;

CAMBODIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FORESTS; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; TREES; UNITED NATIONS;

EID: 84930643060     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154548     Document Type: Erratum

References (110)

1. McKay JE, Mangunjaya FM, Dinata Y, Harrop SR, Khalid F. Practise what you preach: A faith-based approach to conservation in Indonesia. Oryx. 2014; 48: 23-29.
2. Mikusiñski G, Possingham HP, Blicharska M. Biodiversity priority areas and religions-A global analysis of spatial overlap. Oryx. 2014; 48: 17-22.
3. Gillespie J. Protecting world heritage: Regulating ownership and land use at Angkor archaeological park, Cambodia. Int J Herit Stud 2009; 15: 338-354.
4. Wales N. Combining remote sensing change detection and qualitative data to examine landscape change in the context of world heritage. Sidney: School of Geosciences, University of Sydney; 2012.
5. Gaughan AE, Binford MW, Southworth J. Tourism, forest conversion, and land transformations in the Angkor basin, Cambodia. Appl Geogr. 2009; 29: 212-223.
6. Lemaistre A, Cavalier S. Analyses and management prospects of the International Angkor Programme. Museum Int. 2002; 54: 117-125.
7. Koh LP, Wich SA. Dawn of drone ecology: Low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Trop Conserv Sci. 2012; 5: 121-132.
8. Palace M, Keller M, Asner GP, Hagen S, Braswell B. Amazon forest structure from IKONOS satellite data and the automated characterization of forest canopy properties. Biotropica. 2008; 40: 141-150.
9. Garzon-Lopez CX, Bohlman SA, Olff H, Jansen PA. Mapping tropical forest trees using high-resolution aerial digital photographs. Biotropica. 2013; 45: 308-316.
10. González-Orozco CE, Mulligan M, Trichon V, Jarvis A. Taxonomic identification of Amazonian tree crowns from aerial photography. Appl Veg Sci. 2010; 13: 510-519.
11. th International Conference on Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis, Georgia. 2012.
12. Dey V, Zhang Y, Zhong M. A review on image segmentation techniques with remote sensing perspective. In ISPRS TC VII Symposium-100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria. 2010; 31-42.
13. Carleer AP, Debeir O, Wolff E. Assessment of very high spatial resolution satellite image segmentations. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2005; 71: 1285-1294.
14. Jing LH, Hu BX, Li JL, Noland T. An individual tree crown delineation method based on multi-scale segmentation of imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2012; 70: 88-98.
15. Ke Y, Quackenbush LJ, Im J. Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sens Environ. 2010; 114: 1141-1154.
16. Kanda F, Kubo M, Muramoto KI. Watershed segmentation and classification of tree species using high resolution forest imagery. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, '04. IGARSS'04. Proceedings, 2004 IEEE International. 2004; 6: 3822-3825.
17. Yang J, He Y, Caspersen J. A multi-band watershed segmentation method for individual tree crown delineation from high resolution multispectral aerial image. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2014 IEEE International. 2014; 1588-1591.
18. Tochon G, Feret J, Martin RE, Tupayachi R, Chanussot J, Asner GP. Binary partition tree as a hyperspectral segmentation tool for tropical rainforests. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2012 IEEE International. 2012; 6368-6371.
19. Korom A, Phua MH, Hirata Y, Matsuura T. Extracting oil palm crown from WorldView-2 satellite image. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2004; 18: 012188.
20. Phua MH, Saito H. Estimation of biomass of a mountainous tropical forest using Landsat TM data. Can J Remote Sens. 2003; 29: 429-440.
21. Kumar M, Rajan K, Adkins D. Object based image analysis tools for Opticks. In OSGEO-India: FOSS4G 2012- First National Conference, Hyderabad, India. 2012; 1-5.
22. Hall O, Hay GJ, Bouchard A, Marceau DJ. Detecting dominant landscape objects through multiple scales: An integration of object-specific methods and watershed segmentation. Landscape Ecol. 2004; 19: 59-76.
23. Tsendbazar NE. Object based image analysis of geo-eye VHR data to model above ground carbon stock in Himalayan mid-hill forests, Nepal. M.Sc. Thesis, Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 2011.Available: http://www.itc.nl/library/papers-2011/msc/nrm/tsendbazar.pdf
24. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2010; 65: 2-16.
25. Kim M, Madden M, Warner TA. Forest type mapping using object-specific texture measures from multispectral IKONOS imagery: Segmentation quality and image classification issues. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2009; 75: 819-829.
26. Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2004; 58: 239-258.
27. Lizarazo I, Elsner P. From pixels to grixels: A unified functional model for geographic object-based image analysis. Canada: University of Calgary; 2008.
28. Kux HJ, Souza UD. Object-based image analysis of WORLDVIEW-2 satellite data for the classification of mangrove areas in the city of São Luís, Maranhão State, Brazil. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2012; I-4: 95-100.
29. Gao J. Digital analysis of remotely sensed imagery. In: Multi-temporal image analysis. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill; 2009. Ch. 13, p. 645.
30. Galletti CS, Myint SW. Land-use mapping in a mixed urban-agricultural arid landscape using objectbased image analysis: A case study from Maricopa, Arizona. Remote Sens. 2014; 6: 6089-6110.
31. Walsh SJ, McClearya AL, Menaa CF, Shaoa Y, Tuttlea JP, Gonzálezb A, et al. QuickBird and Hyperion data analysis of an invasive plant species in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador: Implications for control and land use management. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008; 112: 1927-1941.
32. Guo Q, Kelly M, Gong P, Liu D. An object-based classification approach in mapping tree mortality using high spatial resolution imagery. GISci Remote Sens. 2007; 44: 24-47.
33. Whiteside T. Multiscale vegetation characterisation of tropical savanna using object-based image analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Charles Darwin University, Melbourne. 2011. Available: http://eprints.batchelor.edu.au/258/
34. Arasato LS, Amaral S, Rennó CD. Detecting individual palm trees (Arecaceae family) in the Amazon rainforest using high resolution image classification. In Anais XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, SBSR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. 2011; 7628-7635.
35. Gomes MF, Maillard P. Identification of urban tree crown in a tropical environment using WorldView-2 data: Problems and perspectives. In SPIE Remote Sensing, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013: 88930C-88930C.
36. Erikson M, Olofsson K. Comparison of three individual tree crown detection methods. Mach Vis Appl. 2005; 16: 258-265.
37. Corlett RT. Frugivory and seed dispersal in degraded tropical East Asian landscapes. In Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M, editors. Seed dispersal and frugivory: Ecology, evolution and conservation. In Third International Symposium-Workshop on Frugivores and Seed Dispersal, São Pedro, Brazil. 2000; 451-465.
38. Kakunda CB. Synergy of airborne LiDAR data and VHR satellite optical imagery for individual crown and tree species identification. M.Sc. Thesis, Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation for Environmental Modelling and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 2013. Available: http://www.itc.nl/library/papers-2013/msc/gem/kukunda.pdf.
39. Franklin SE, Maudie AJ, Lavigne MB. Using spatial co-occurrence texture to increase forest structure and species composition classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2001; 67: 849-855.
40. Kulikova M, Mani M, Srivastava A, Descombes X, Zerubia J. Tree species classification using radiometry, texture and shape based features. In EUSIPCO, Poznan, Poland. 2007; 1-5.
41. Tokola T, Vauhkonen J, Leppänen V, Pusa T, Mehtätalo L, Pitkänen J. Applied 3D texture features in als-based tree species segmentation. In ISPRS Conference, Georgia. 2008.
42. Zhou JJ, Zhao Z, Zhao Q, Zhao J, Wang H. Quantification of aboveground forest biomass using Quickbird imagery, topographic variables, and field data. J Appl Remote Sens. 2013; 7: 073484.
43. Singh M, Malhi Y, Bhagwat S. Evaluating land use and aboveground biomass dynamics in an oil palm-dominated landscape in Borneo using optical remote sensing. J Appl Remote Sens. 2014; 8: 083695.
44. th ISPRS International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, Indonesia. 2007.
45. Simard M, Saatchi SS, De Grandi G. The use of decision tree and multiscale texture for classification of JERS-1 SAR data over tropical forest. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2000; 38: 2310-2321.
46. Hansen M, Potapov P, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 2013; 342: 850-853. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693 PMID: 24233722
47. UN-REDD. Cambodia National UN-REDD National Programme Document. 2010 [Internet]. Available: http://www.unredd.net/index.php?option=com-docman&task=doc-view&gid=7388&tmpl=component&format=raw&Itemid=53. Accessed 2014 Sep 21.
48. Michael Spencer and the FREELAND Foundation. Asia's most precious wood is soaked in blood [Internet]. 2013 Nov 21. Available: http://news.mongabay.com/2013/1121-spencer-freeland-rosewood. html. Accessed 2014 Sep 21.
49. Gaucher J. New archaeological data on the urban space of the capital city of Angkor Thom. In Karlström A, Källén A, editors. Fishbones and glittering emblems: Southeast Asian archaeology 2002. Stockholm, Sweden; 2003. pp. 233-242.
50. Gaucher J. The 'city' of Angkor. What is it? Museum Int. 2002; 54: 28-36.
51. Maxwell JF. Vegetation and vascular flora of the Ban Saneh Pawng area, Lai Wo subdistrict, Sangklaburi District, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand. Nat Hist Bull Siam Soc. 1995; 43: 131-170.
52. Steinmetz RG. Ecological overlap of sympatric sun bears and Asiatic black bears in tropical forest, Thailand. Dissertation, University of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 2009. Available: http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/54849
53. Marthews T, Metcalfe D, Malhi Y, Phillips O, Huaraca-Huasco W. Measuring tropical forest carbon allocation and cycling: A RAINFOR-GEM field manual for intensive census plots. Manual, Global Ecosystems Monitoring. 2012; 2:2.
54. Popescu SC, Wynne RH, Nelson RF. Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Can J Remote Sens. 2003; 29: 564-577.
55. Malhi Y. The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of tropical forest vegetation. J Ecol. 2012; 100: 65-75.
56. World Agroforestry Centre. Agroforestree database [Internet]. 2013 Dec. Available: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/resources/-databases/agroforestree. Accessed 2014 Sep 21.
57. Evans D, Pottier C, Fletcher R, Hensley S, Tapley I, Milne A, et al. A comprehensive archaeological map of the world's largest preindustrial settlement complex at Angkor, Cambodia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 14277-14282. PMID: 17717084
58. Gougeon FA, Leckie DG. The individual tree crown approach applied to Ikonos images of a coniferous plantation area. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2006; 72: 1287-1297.
59. Jones HG, Vaughan RA. Remote sensing of vegetation: Principles, techniques, and applications. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2010.
60. Hatami F. Carbon estimation of individual trees using high laser density data of airborne LiDar: A case study in Bois-Noir, France. Enschede, The Netherlands; 2012.
61. Englhart S, Jubanski J, Siegert F. Quantifying dynamics in tropical peat swamp forest biomass with multi-temporal LiDAR datasets. Remote Sens. 2013; 5: 2368-2388.
62. Liu X, Zhang Z, Peterson J, Chandra S. The effect of LiDAR data density on DEM accuracy. In International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. 2007; 1363-1369.
63. Li Z, Zhu C, Gold C. Digital terrain modeling: Principles and methodology. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2010.
64. d'Oliveira MV, Reutebuch SE, McGaughey RJ, Andersen HE. Estimating forest biomass and identifying low-intensity logging areas using airborne scanning lidar in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sens Environ. 2012; 124: 479-491.
65. McGaughey RJ. Fusion/LDV: Software for LiDAR data analysis and visualization [Computer program]. 2010.
66. Kraus K, Pfeifer N. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J. Photogramm Remote Sens. 1998; 53: 193-203.
67. Wang L, Gong P, Biging GS. Individual tree-crown delineation and treetop detection in high-spatialresolution aerial imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2004; 70: 351-357.
68. Chen Q, Baldocchi D, Gong P, Kelly M. Isolating individual trees in a savanna woodland using small footprint lidar data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2006; 72: 923-932.
69. Hay GJ, Marceau DJ, Dubé P, Bouchard A. A multiscale framework for landscape analysis: Objectspecific analysis and upscaling. Landscape Ecol. 2001; 16: 471-490.
70. Yan G, Mas JF, Maathuis BHP, Xiangmin Z, Van Dijk PM. Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches-A case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens. 2006; 27: 4039-4055.
71. Jakubowski MK, Li W, Guo Q, Kelly M. Delineating individual trees from lidar data: A comparison of vector-and raster-based segmentation approaches. Remote Sens. 2013; 5: 4163-4186.
72. Clinton N, Holt A, Yan L, Gong P. An accuracy assessment measure for object based image segmentation. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2008; 37: 1189-1194.
73. Mei C, Durrieu S. Tree crown delineation from digital elevation models and high resolution imagery. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Working Group. 2004: 218-223.
74. Mbaabu PR. Agb/Carbon mapping using airborne lidar data and geoeye satellite images in tropical forest of Chitwan-Nepal: A comparison of community and government managed forests. Enschede, The Netherlands. 2012.
75. Shafri HZ, Suhaili A, Mansor S. The performance of maximum likelihood, spectral angle mapper, neural network and decision tree classifiers in hyperspectral image analysis. J Comput Sci. 2007; 3: 419-423.
76. Campbell M. Sacred groves for forest conservation in Ghana's coastal savannas: Assessing ecological and social dimensions. Singap J Trop Geogr. 2005; 26: 151-169.
77. Sebastian BV, Unnikrishnan A, Balakrishnan K. Grey level co-occurrence matrices: Generalisation and some new features. IJCSEIT. 2012; 2: 151-157.
78. Martínez-Usó A, Pla F, Sotoca JM, García-Sevilla P. Clustering-based hyperspectral band selection using information measures. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2007; 45: 4158-4171.
79. th International Symposium on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing, 2007.
80. Karegowda AG, Manjunath AS, Jayaram MA. Comparative study of attribute selection using gain ratio and correlation based Featuer selection. Int J Inf Technol Know Manage. 2010; 2: 271-277.
81. Wang L, Birt AG, Lafon CW, Cairns DM, Coulson RN, Tchakerian MD, et al. Computer-based synthetic data to assess the tree delineation algorithm from airborne LiDAR survey. Geoinformatica. 2013; 17: 35-61.
82. Tinkham WT, Smith AMS, Hoffman C, Hudak AT, Falkowski MJ, Swanson ME, et al. Investigating the influence of LiDAR ground surface errors on the utility of derived forest inventories. Can J Forest Res. 2012; 42: 413-422.
83. Shendryk I. Integration of LiDAR data and satellite imagery for biomass estimation in conifer-dominated forest. Thesis, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden. 2013. Available: http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/3364920/file/3364939.pdf
84. Edson C, Wing MG. Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) for individual tree stem location, height, and biomass measurements. Remote Sens. 2011; 3: 2494-2528.
85. Huang H, Gong P, Cheng X, Clinton N, Li Z. Improving measurement of forest structural parameters by co-registering of high resolution aerial imagery and low density LiDAR data. Sensors. 2009; 9: 1541-1558. doi: 10.3390/s90301541 PMID: 22573971
86. Clark ML, Clark DB, Roberts DA. Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape. Remote Sens Environ. 2004; 91: 68-89.
87. Hodgson ME, Bresnahan P. Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation: Empirical assessment and error budget. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2004; 70: 331-339.
88. Larjavaara M, Muller-Landau HC. Measuring tree height: A quantitative comparison of two common field methods in a moist tropical forest. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013; 4: 793-801.
89. Hunter MO, Keller M, Victoria D, Morton DC. Tree height and tropical forest biomass estimation. Biogeosciences. 2013; 10: 8385-8399.
90. Imai Y, Setojima M, Yamagishi Y, Fujiwara N. Tree-height measuring characteristics of urban forests by LiDAR data different in resolution. In International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Florida, USA. 2004; 4.
91. th International Colloquium Signal Processing and Its Applications (CSPA). 2011; 354-358.
92. Coburn CA, Roberts ACB. A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification. Int J Remote Sens. 2004; 25: 4287-4308.
93. Eckert S. Improved forest biomass and carbon estimations using texture measures from WorldView-2 satellite data. Remote Sens. 2012; 4: 810-829.
94. Cho MA, Mathieu R, Asner GP, Naidoo L, van Aardt J, Ramoelo A, et al. Mapping tree species composition in South African savannas using an integrated airborne spectral and LiDAR system. Remote Sens Environ. 2012; 125: 214-226.
95. th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Sydney, Australia. 2011; 10-15.
96. Jansen P, Bohlman SA, Garzon-Lopez CX, Olff H, Muller-Landau HC, Wright SJ. Large-scale spatial variation in palm fruit abundance across a tropical moist forest estimated from high-resolution aerial photographs. Ecography. 2008; 31: 33-42.
97. Clark ML, Roberts DA. Species-level differences in hyperspectral metrics among tropical rainforest trees as determined by a tree-based classifier. Remote Sens. 2012; 4: 1820-1855.
98. Heenkenda MK, Joyce KE, Maier SW, Bartolo R. Mangrove species identification: Comparing World- View-2 with aerial photographs. Remote Sens. 2014; 6: 6064-6088.
99. Heinzel JN, Weinacker H, Koch B. Full automatic detection of tree species based on delineated single tree crowns-A data fusion approach for airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs. In Proceedings of SilviLaser, Edinburgh, UK, 2008.
100. Smits I, Prieditis G, Dagis S, Dubrovskis D. Individual tree identification using different LIDAR and optical imagery data processing methods. Biosystems Inform Tech. 2012; 1: 19-24.
101. Koedsin W, Vaiphasa C. Discrimination of tropical mangroves at the species level with EO-1 Hyperion data. Remote Sens. 2013; 5: 3562-3582.
102. Miura K. Conservation of a 'living heritage site' A contradiction in terms? A case study of Angkor World Heritage Site. CMAS. 2005; 7: 3-18.
103. Fowler P. World heritage cultural landscapes, 1992-2002: A review and prospect. In World Heritage 2002 Shared Legacy, Common Responsibility, Associated Workshops, Ferrara, Italy. 2003; 16: 16-31.
104. Primack RB, Bray D, Galletti HA, Ponciano I, editors. Timber, tourists, and temples: Conservation and development in the Maya forest of Belize Guatemala and Mexico. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1998.
105. Tan BS. The deterioration of the stone in Angkor and the protective role of the forest. In Twenty-First Technical Committee, ASPARA National Authority, Siem Reap, Cambodia. 2012; 108-110.
106. Diamond J. Archaeology: Maya, Khmer and Inca. Nature. 2009; 461: 479-480. doi: 10.1038/461479a PMID: 19779438
107. Evans DH, Fletcher RJ, Pottier C, Chevance JB, Soutif D, Tan BS, et al. Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110: 12595-12600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306539110 PMID: 23847206
108. Fletcher R, Johnson I, Bruce E, Khun-Neay K. Living with heritage: Site monitoring and heritage values in Greater Angkor and the Angkor World Heritage Site, Cambodia. World Archaeol. 2007; 39: 385-405.
109. Turner II BL, Sabloff JA. Classic Period collapse of the Central Maya Lowlands: Insights about human-environment relationships for sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: 13908-13914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210106109 PMID: 22912403
110. Turner II BL, Villar SC, Foster D, Geoghegan J, Keys E, Klepeis P, et al. Deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: An integrative approach. For Ecol Manage. 2001; 154: 353-370.