The running coupling of 8 flavors and 3 colors

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Fodor, Zoltan ^a,b,c   Holland, Kieran ^d   Kuti, Julius ^e   Mondal, Santanu ^c,f   Nogradi, Daniel ^c,f   Wong, Chik Him ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^c EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f MTA ELTE Lattice Gauge Theory Research Group   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Lattice Gauge Field Theories; Lattice Quantum Field Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930633860     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2015)019     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. W.E. Caswell, Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.33 (1974) 244 [INSPIRE].
2. T. Banks and A. Zaks, On the Phase Structure of Vector-Like Gauge Theories with Massless Fermions, Nucl. Phys.B 196 (1982) 189 [INSPIRE].
3. T. Appelquist, G.T. Fleming and E.T. Neil, Lattice study of the conformal window in QCD-like theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 171607 [arXiv:0712.0609] [INSPIRE].
4. A. Deuzeman, M.P. Lombardo and E. Pallante, The Physics of eight flavours, Phys. Lett.B 670 (2008) 41 [arXiv:0804.2905] [INSPIRE].
5. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C. Schroeder, Nearly conformal gauge theories in finite volume, Phys. Lett.B 681 (2009) 353 [arXiv:0907.4562] [INSPIRE].
6. LatKMI collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., Light composite scalar in eight-flavor QCD on the lattice, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 111502 [arXiv:1403.5000] [INSPIRE].
7. A. Cheng, A. Hasenfratz, G. Petropoulos and D. Schaich, Scale-dependent mass anomalous dimension from Dirac eigenmodes, JHEP07 (2013) 061 [arXiv:1301.1355] [INSPIRE].
8. A. Hasenfratz, D. Schaich and A. Veernala, Nonperturbative β-function of eight-flavor SU(3) gauge theory, arXiv:1410.5886 [INSPIRE].
9. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong, The Yang-Mills gradient flow in finite volume, JHEP11 (2012) 007 [arXiv:1208.1051] [INSPIRE].
10. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong, The gradient flow running coupling scheme, PoS(LATTICE 2012)050 [arXiv:1211.3247] [INSPIRE].
11. M. Lüscher, Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Commun. Math. Phys.293 (2010) 899 [arXiv:0907.5491] [INSPIRE].
12. M. Lüscher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP08 (2010) 071 [Erratum ibid.03 (2014) 092] [arXiv:1006.4518] [INSPIRE].
13. M. Lüscher, Topology, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, PoS(LATTICE 2010)015 [arXiv:1009.5877] [INSPIRE].
14. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP02 (2011) 051 [arXiv:1101.0963] [INSPIRE].
15. C. Morningstar and M.J. Peardon, Analytic smearing of SU(3) link variables in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev.D 69 (2004) 054501 [hep-lat/0311018] [INSPIRE].
16. R. Lohmayer and H. Neuberger, Continuous smearing of Wilson Loops, PoS(LATTICE2011)249 [arXiv:1110.3522] [INSPIRE].
17. M. Lüscher, Some Analytic Results Concerning the Mass Spectrum of Yang-Mills Gauge Theories on a Torus, Nucl. Phys.B 219 (1983) 233 [INSPIRE].
18. J. Koller and P. van Baal, A Rigorous Nonperturbative Result for the Glueball Mass and Electric Flux Energy in a Finite Volume, Nucl. Phys.B 273 (1986) 387 [INSPIRE].
19. J. Koller and P. van Baal, A Nonperturbative Analysis in Finite Volume Gauge Theory, Nucl. Phys.B 302 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].
20. P. van Baal, The Small Volume Expansion of Gauge Theories Coupled to Massless Fermions, Nucl. Phys.B 307 (1988) 274 [Erratum ibid.B 312 (1989) 752] [INSPIRE].
21. P. van Baal, Gauge Theory in a Finite Volume, Acta Phys. Polon.B 20 (1989) 295 [INSPIRE].
22. C.P. Korthals Altes, Fluctuations Of Constant Potentials In Qcd And Their Contribution To Finite Size Effects, CPT-85/P-1806 (2015).
23. A. Coste, A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, J. Jurkiewicz and C.P. Korthals Altes, Zero Momentum Contribution to Wilson Loops in Periodic Boxes, Nucl. Phys.B 262 (1985) 67 [INSPIRE].
24. A. Coste, A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, C.P. Korthals Altes, B. Soderberg and A. Tarancon, Finite Size Effects and Twisted Boundary Conditions, Nucl. Phys.B 287 (1987) 569 [INSPIRE].
25. C.P. Korthals Altes, Pure QCD in small volumes and the low lying glueball spectrum, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.10A (1989) 284 [INSPIRE].
26. Z. Fodor et al., The lattice gradient flow at tree-level and its improvement, JHEP09 (2014) 018 [arXiv:1406.0827] [INSPIRE].
27. P. Fritzsch and A. Ramos, The gradient flow coupling in the Schrödinger Functional, JHEP10 (2013) 008 [arXiv:1301.4388] [INSPIRE].
28. P. Fritzsch and A. Ramos, Studying the gradient flow coupling in the Schrödinger functional, PoS(Lattice 2013)319 [arXiv:1308.4559] [INSPIRE].
29. A. Ramos, The gradient flow in a twisted box, PoS(Lattice 2013)053 [arXiv:1308.4558] [INSPIRE].
30. J. Rantaharju, The Gradient Flow Coupling in Minimal Walking Technicolor, PoS(Lattice2013)084 [arXiv:1311.3719] [INSPIRE].
31. M. Lüscher, Step scaling and the Yang-Mills gradient flow, JHEP06 (2014) 105 [arXiv:1404.5930] [INSPIRE].
32. A. Ramos, The gradient flow running coupling with twisted boundary conditions, JHEP11 (2014) 101 [arXiv:1409.1445] [INSPIRE].
33. S. Borsányi et al., High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD, JHEP09 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1203.4469] [INSPIRE].
34. S. Borsányi et al., Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2 + 1 flavors, Phys. Lett.B 730 (2014) 99 [arXiv:1309.5258] [INSPIRE].
35. MILC collaboration, A. Bazavov et al., Symanzik flow on HISQ ensembles, PoS(Lattice2013)269 [arXiv:1311.1474] [INSPIRE].
36. R. Sommer, Scale setting in lattice QCD, PoS(Lattice 2013)015 [arXiv:1401.3270] [INSPIRE].
37. FlowQCD collaboration, M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda, E. Itou, M. Kitazawa and H. Suzuki, Thermodynamics of SU(3) gauge theory from gradient flow on the lattice, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 011501 [arXiv:1312.7492] [INSPIRE].
38. H. Suzuki, Energy-momentum tensor from the Yang-Mills gradient flow, PTEP2013 (2013) 083B03 [arXiv:1304.0533] [INSPIRE].
39. L. Del Debbio, A. Patella and A. Rago, Space-time symmetries and the Yang-Mills gradient flow, JHEP11 (2013) 212 [arXiv:1306.1173] [INSPIRE].
40. H. Makino and H. Suzuki, Lattice energy-momentum tensor from the Yang-Mills gradient flow-inclusion of fermion fields, PTEP2014 (2014) 063B02 [arXiv:1403.4772] [INSPIRE].
41. O. Bär and M. Golterman, Chiral perturbation theory for gradient flow observables, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 034505 [Erratum ibid.D 89 (2014) 099905] [arXiv:1312.4999] [INSPIRE].
42. M. Lüscher, Chiral symmetry and the Yang-Mills gradient flow, JHEP04 (2013) 123 [arXiv:1302.5246] [INSPIRE].
43. A. Shindler, Chiral Ward identities, automatic O(a) improvement and the gradient flow, Nucl. Phys.B 881 (2014) 71 [arXiv:1312.4908] [INSPIRE].
44. A. Chowdhury, A. Harindranath and J. Maiti, Open Boundary Condition, Wilson Flow and the Scalar Glueball Mass, JHEP06 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1402.7138] [INSPIRE].
45. K. Symanzik, Continuum Limit and Improved Action in Lattice Theories. 1. Principles and ϕ4Theory, Nucl. Phys.B 226 (1983) 187 [INSPIRE].
46. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, On-Shell Improved Lattice Gauge Theories, Commun. Math. Phys.97 (1985) 59 [Erratum ibid.98 (1985) 433] [INSPIRE].
47. A. Ramos, The Yang-Mills gradient flow and renormalization, talk at Lattice 2014, Columbia University, New York U.S.A. (2014).
48. S. Duane, A.D. Kennedy, B.J. Pendleton and D. Roweth, Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett.B 195 (1987) 216 [INSPIRE].
49. J.C. Sexton and D.H. Weingarten, Hamiltonian evolution for the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm, Nucl. Phys.B 380 (1992) 665 [INSPIRE].
50. T. Takaishi and P. de Forcrand, Testing and tuning new symplectic integrators for hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev.E 73 (2006) 036706 [hep-lat/0505020] [INSPIRE].
51. M. Lüscher, P. Weisz and U. Wolff, A Numerical method to compute the running coupling in asymptotically free theories, Nucl. Phys.B 359 (1991) 221 [INSPIRE].
52. M. Lüscher, R. Narayanan, P. Weisz and U. Wolff, The Schrödinger functional: A Renormalizable probe for nonAbelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys.B 384 (1992) 168 [hep-lat/9207009] [INSPIRE].
53. ALPHA collaboration, F. Tekin, R. Sommer and U. Wolff, The Running coupling of QCD with four flavors, Nucl. Phys.B 840 (2010) 114 [arXiv:1006.0672] [INSPIRE].
54. S. Borsányi et al., Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference, Science347 (2015) 1452 [arXiv:1406.4088] [INSPIRE].
55. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterlingand B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, third edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2007) [ISBN-10:0521880688].
56. S. Dürr et al., Ab-Initio Determination of Light Hadron Masses, Science322 (2008) 1224 [arXiv:0906.3599] [INSPIRE].
57. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control19 (1974) 716.
58. C. Hurvich and C.-L. Tsai, Regression and time series model selection in small samples, Biometrica76 (1989) 297.
59. K.P. Burnham and D.R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference, second edition, Springer, New York U.S.A. (2010).
60. G.I. Egri et al., Lattice QCD as a video game, Comput. Phys. Commun.177 (2007) 631 [hep-lat/0611022] [INSPIRE].