How sensitive are ecosystem services in European forest landscapes to silvicultural treatment?

Forests

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1666-1695

  Biber, Peter ^a   Borges, José G ^b   Moshammer, Ralf ^a   Barreiro, Susana ^b   Botequim, Brigite ^b   Brodrechtová, Yvonne ^c   Brukas, Vilis ^d   Chirici, Gherardo ^e   Cordero Debets, Rebeca ^f   Corrigan, Edwin ^b   Eriksson, Ljusk Ola ^d   Favero, Matteo ^g   Galev, Emil ^h   Garcia Gonzalo, Jordi ^b   Hengeveld, Geerten ⁱ   Kavaliauskas, Marius ^j   Marchetti, Marco ^k   Marques, Susete ^b   Mozgeris, Gintautas ^j   Navrátil, Rudolf ^c,l   Nieuwenhuis, Maarten ^b   Orazio, Christophe ^f   Paligorov, Ivan ^h   Pettenella, Davide ^g   Sedmák, Róbert ^c,l   Smreček, Róbert ^c   Stanislovaitis, Andrius ^j   Tomé, Margarida ^b   Trubins, Renats ^d   Tuček, Ján ^c   Vizzarri, Matteo ^k   Wallin, Ida ^d   Pretzsch, Hans ^a   Sallnäs, Ola ^d   more..

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^f Atlantic European Regional Office of the European Forest Institute EFIATLANTIC   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF FORESTRY   (Bulgaria)

ⁱ WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^j VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

^l CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

more..

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; European forests; Scenario analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIODIVERSITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; WOOD PRODUCTS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS); ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; EUROPEAN FORESTS; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SILVICULTURAL TREATMENTS; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; TREE SPECIES COMPOSITION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST RESOURCE; LANDSCAPE; SILVICULTURE; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

EUROPE; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT;

EUROPE;

EID: 84930632697     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19994907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/f6051666     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Von Gadow, K.; Pukkala, T.; Tomé, M. Sustainable Forest Management (Managing Forest Ecosystems); Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2000; pp. 386.
2. Glück, P. Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. In Proceedings of the XX IUFRO World Congress. Working Group S6, Tampere, Finland, 6-12 August 1995; p. 5.
3. MCPFE. Resolution H1: General guidelines for the sustainable management of forests in Europe. In Proceedings of the 2nd Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Helsinki, Finland, 16-17 June 1993; p. 5.
4. Hanewinkel, M.; Cullmann, D.A.; Schelhaas, M.J.; Nabuurs, G.J.; Zimmermann, N.E. Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3, 203-207.
5. Schröter, D.; Cramer, W.; Leemans, I.; Prentice, C.; Araújo, M.B.; Arnell, N.W.; Bondeau, A.; Bugmann, H.; Carter, T.R.; Gracia, C.A.; et al. Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe. Science 2005, 310, 1333-1337.
6. Maracchi, G.; Sirotenko, O.; Bindi, M. Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Clim. Chang. 2005, 70, 117-135.
7. Mohren, G.M.J. Large-scale scenario analysis in forest ecology and forest management. For. Policy Econ. 2003, 5, 103-110.
8. Karjalainen, T.; Pussinen, A.; Liski, J.; Nabuurs, G.J.; Eggers, T.; Lapveteläinen, T.; Kaipainen, T. Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget. For. Policy Econ. 2003, 5, 141-155.
9. INTEGRAL Project Consortium. Future-Oriented Integrated Management of European Forest Landscapes. Available online: http://www.integral-project.eu (accessed on 12 December 2014).
10. INTEGRAL Project Consortium. INTEGRAL 2nd Policy Brief: Future Scenarios of Forest Management in Europe. Available online: http://www.integral-preoject.eu (accessed on 12 December 2014).
11. Borges, J.G.; Nordström, E.M.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Hujala, T.; Trasobares, A. Computer-Based Tools for Supporting Forest Management. The Experience and the Expertise World-Wide; Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Umeå, Sweden, 2014; p. 503.
12. Fabrika, M.; Ďurskỳ, J. Algorithms and software solution of thinning models for SIBYLA growth simulator. J. For. Sci. 2005, 51, 431-445.
13. Le Moguédec, G.; Dhôte, J.F. Fagacées: A tree-centered growth and yield model for sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann. For. Sci. 2012, 69, 257-269.
14. Lemoine, B. Growth and yield of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait): The average dominant tree of the stand. Ann. Sci. For. 1991, 48, 593-611.
15. Dufour-Kowalski, S.; Courbaud, B.; Dreyfus, P.; Meredieu, C.; de Coligny, F. Capsis: An open software framework and community for forest growth modelling. Ann. For. Sci. 2012, 69, 221-233.
16. Pretzsch, H.; Biber, P.; Dursky, J. The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation. Abstr. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 162, 3-21.
17. Pretzsch, H. Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield; Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2010; p. 664.
18. Remsoft. Forestry. Available online: http://www.remsoft.com/forestry.php (accessed on 12 December 2014).
19. Sallnäs, O. A matrix growth model of the Swedish forest. Stud. For. Suec. 1990, 183, 1-23.
20. Schelhaas, M.J.; Eggers, J.; Lindner, M.; Nabuurs, G.J.; Pussinen, A.; Päivinen, R.; Schuck, A.; Verkerk, P.J.; van der Werf, D.C.; Zudin, S. Model Documentation for the European Forest Information Scenario Model (EFISCEN 3.1.3); Alterra Rapport 1559, EFI Technical Report 26; Cereales Publishers: Wageningen, Netherland, 2007.
21. Petrauskas, E.; Kuliešis, A. Scenario-based analysis of possible management alternatives for Lithuanian forests in the 21st century. Balt. For. 2004, 10, 72-82.
22. Schumacher, S.; Bugmann, H.; Mladenoff, D.J. Improving the formulation of tree growth and succession in a spatially explicit landscape model. Ecol. Model. 2004, 180, 175-194.
23. Hengeveld, G.M.; Didion, M.; Clerkx, S.; Elkin, C.; Nabuurs, G.J.; Schelhaas, M.J. The landscape-level effect of individual owner adaptations to climate change in Dutch forests. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014, doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0718-5.
24. Barreiro, S.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Borges, J.G.; Tomé, M.; Marques, S. SADfLOR Tutorial. A Web-Based Forest and Natural Resources Decision Support System (Work in Progress); FORCHANGE, ISA: Lisbon, Portugal, 2013; p. 39.
25. Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Borges, J.G.; Palma, J.; Zuzibarreta-Gerendiain, A. A decision support system for management planning of Eucalyptus plantations facing climate change. Ann. For. Sci. 2014, 71, 187-199.
26. Fabrika, M.; Ďurskỳ, J. Implementing Tree Growth Models in Slovakia. In Sustainable Forest Management. Growth Models for Europe; Hasenauer, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006; pp. 315-341.
27. Wikström, P.; Edenius, L.; Elfving, B.; Eriksson, L.O.; Lämås, T.; Sonesson, J.; Öhman, K.; Wallerman, J.; Waller, C.; Klintebäck, F. The Heureka forestry decision support system: An overview. Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci. 2011, 3, 87-94.
28. INTEGRAL Project Consortium. INTEGRAL ForestWiki. Available online: https://forestwiki. jrc.ec.europa.eu/integral/index.php/Category:Country (accessed on 12 December 2014).
29. Schall, P.; Ammer, C. Quantifying forest stand management intensity in Central European forests. Eur. J. For. Res. 2013, 132, 397-397.
30. Hartigan, J.; Kleiner, B. Mosaics for contingency tables. In Computer Science and Statistics, Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on the Interface, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 12-13 March 1981; pp. 268-273.
31. Meyer, D.; Zeileis, A.; Hornik, K. The Strucplot Framework: Visualizing Multi-Way Contingency Tables with vcd. J. Stat. Softw. 2006, 17, 1-48.
32. Verschuyl, J.; Riffell, S.; Miller, D.; Bently Wigley, T. Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests-A meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261, 221-232.
33. Kramer, K.; Mohren, G.M.J. Long-Term Effects of Climate Change on Carbon Budgets of Forests in Europe; Alterra-Report 194; Alterra: Wageningen, Netherland, 2001.
34. Pretzsch, H.; Biber, P.; Schütze, G.; Uhl, E.; Rötzer, T. Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nature Communi. 2014, doi:10.1039/ncomms5967.
35. Pretzsch, H.; Grote, R.; Reineking, B.; Rötzer, T.; Seifert, S. Models for forest ecosystem management: A European perspective. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 1065-1087.
36. Pretzsch, H. Application and evaluation of the growth simulator SILVA 2.2 for forest stands, forest estates and large regions. Forstwiss. Cent. 2002, 121, 28-51.
37. Nabuurs, G.J.; Päivinen, R.; Schanz, H. Sustainable management regimes for Europe's forests-A projection with EFISCEN until 2050. For. Policy Econ. 2001, 3, 155-173.