Analysing user contribution patterns of drone pictures to the dronestagram photo sharing portal

Journal of Spatial Science

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 79-98

  Hochmair, Hartwig H ^a   Zielstra, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

contribution pattern; drone imagery; VGI

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; IMAGERY; UNMANNED VEHICLE;

EID: 84930541981     PISSN: 14498596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14498596.2015.969340     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. AdamsS.M., & FriedlandC.J. (2011) A survey of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage for imagery collection in disaster research and management, Ninth International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Response.
2. AndrienkoG., AndrienkoN., BakP., KisilevichS., & KeimD. (2009) Analysis of community-contributed space- and time-referenced data (example of Flickr and Panoramio photos), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.
3. AntoniouV., MorleyJ., & HaklayM. (2010) Web 2.0 geotagged photos: assessing the spatial dimensions of the phenomenon. Geomatica, vol. 64, pp. 99–110.
4. BohmA. (2013) Available from: https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/status-domestic-drone-legislation-states [Accessed 7/21/2014]Status of domestic drone legislation in the states.
5. BrennanS., SadilekA., & KautzH. (2013) Towards understanding global spread of disease from everyday interpersonal interactions, 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013).
6. Bundesministerium für Verkehr (2012) Available from: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/luftvo/gesamt.pdf [Accessed 7/21/2014]Luftverkehrs-Ordnung (LuftVO).
7. BüttnerG., KosztraB., MauchaG., & PatakiR. (2012) Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/clc-2006-vector-data-version-2/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]Implementation and achievements of CLC2006.
8. ChenL., & RoyA. (2009) Event detection from Flickr data through wavelet-based spatial analysis, 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
9. DeMarisA. (2004) Regression with Social Data: Modeling Continuous and Limited Response Variables, Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
10. de SmithM.J., GoodchildM.F., & LongleyP.A. (2013). 4th ed.Geospatial Analysis, Matador, Leicester.
11. ElwoodS., GoodchildM.F., & SuiD.Z. (2012) Researching volunteered geographic information: spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 571–590.
12. Farlex (2014) Available from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/drone [Accessed 7/21/2014]TheFreeDictionary.
13. Federal Aviation Administration (1981) Available from: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/1acfc3f689769a56862569e70077c9cc/$FILE/ATTBJMAC/ac91-57.pdf [Accessed 7/21/2014]Advisory circular 91-57: model aircraft operating standards.
14. Federal Aviation Administration (2013) Available from: http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/media/UAS_Roadmap_2013.pdf [Accessed 7/21/2014]Integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in the national airspace system (NAS) roadmap.
15. GarciaZ. (2013) Available from: http://www.missouridronejournalism.com/2013/04/what-flies-when-it-comes-to-drone-laws-across-the-globe/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]What flies when it comes to drone laws across the globe.
16. GirardinF., CalabreseJ., FioreF., RattiF.D., & BlatC. (2008) Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 36–43.
17. GoodchildM.F. (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0 (Editorial). International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research (IJSDIR), vol. 2, pp. 24–32.
18. HechtB., & GergleD. (2010) On the ‘localness’ of user-generated content, Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 229–232.
19. HeipkeC. (2010) Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 550–557.
20. HochmairH.H. (2010) Spatial association of geotagged photos with scenic locations. In: Car, A., Griesebner, G., & Strobl, J., eds. Proceedings of the Geoinformatics Forum Salzburg, Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp. 91–100.
21. HollensteinL., & PurvesR.S. (2010) Exploring place through user-generated content: using Flickr to describe city cores. Journal of Spatial Information Science, vol. 1, pp. 21–48.
22. IngrahamN. (2012) Available from: http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/18/2957154/google-earth-balloon-kite-sourced-imagery [Accessed 7/21/2014]Google Earth now includes publicly-sourced aerial images from balloons and kites.
23. JavanmardiS., GanjisaffarY., LopesC., & BaldiP. (2009) User contribution and trust in Wikipedia, 5th International ICST Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications, Worksharing.
24. KulldorffM. (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, vol. 26, pp. 1481–1496.
25. KulldorffM. (2014) Available from: http://www.satscan.org/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]SaTScan user guide for version 9.3.
26. LaliberteA.S., & RangoA. (2009) Texture and scale in object-based analysis of subdecimeter resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 761–770.
27. LiY., & ShanJ. (2013) Understanding the spatio-temporal pattern of tweets. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. September 2013, pp. 769–773.
28. LiL., GoodchildM.F., & XuB. (2013) Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 61–77.
29. LinY., HyyppaJ., & JaakkolaA. (2011) Mini-UAV-borne LIDAR for fine-scale mapping. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 426–430.
30. MasiA. (2013) Available from: http://www.vocativ.com/world/france-world/france-drones-rage/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]In France, drones are all the rage.
31. Natural Earth (2014) Available from: http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]Natural earth.
32. NeisP., & ZipfA. (2012) Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project – the case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 1, pp. 46–165.
33. NielsenJ. (2006) Available from: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]Participation inequality: encouraging more users to contribute.
34. NoulasA., ScellatoS., LambiotteR., PontilM., MascoloC., & AñelJ.A. (2012) A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility. PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. e37027.
35. Public Lab (2013) Available from: http://publiclab.org/wiki/balloon-mapping [Accessed 7/21/2014]The public laboratory for open technology and science: Balloon & Kite Mapping.
36. RemondinoF., BarazzettiL., NexF., ScaioniM., & SarazziD. (2011) UAV photogrammetry for mapping and 3D modeling – current status and future perspectives. In: Eisenbeiss, H., Kunz, M., & Ingensand, H., eds. ISPRS Archives – International Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics (UAV-g) (38-1/C22), ISPRS, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 25–31.
37. ReuterH.I., NelsonA., & JarvisA. (2007) An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 983–1008.
38. SaglG., ReschB., HawelkaB., & BeinatE. (2012) From social sensor data to collective human behaviour patterns – analysing and visualising spatio-temporal dynamics in urban environments. In: Jekel, T., Car, A., & Strobl, J., eds. GI_Forum 2012: Geovisualization, Society and Learning, Wichmann, Berlin, pp. 54–63.
39. SchliederC., & MatyasC. (2009) Photographing a city: an analysis of place concepts based on spatial choices. Spatial Cognition & Computation, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 212–228.
40. SudekumB. (2013) Available from: www.mapbox.com/blog/drone-imagery-openstreetmap/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]Drone imagery for OpenStreetMap.
41. TachikawaT., KakuM., & IwasakiA. (2011) Available from: https://lpdaacaster.cr.usgs.gov/GDEM/Appendix_A_ERSDAC_GDEM2_validation_report.pdf [Accessed 5/6/2014]ASTER GDEM Version 2 validation report.
42. The Associated Press (2013) Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/02/07/seattle-police-drone-efforts/1900785/ [Accessed 7/21/2014]Seattle mayor ends police drone efforts.
43. Torres-SanchezJ., Lopez-GranadosF., De CastroA.I., & Pena-BarraganJ.M. (2013) Configuration and specifications of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for early site specific weed management. PLoS ONE, vol. 7, pp. e37027.
44. UK Civil Aviation Authority (2012) Available from: www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/cap722.pdf [Accessed 5/6/2014]Unmanned aircraft system operations in UK Airspace – guidance.
45. UNEP (2014) Available from: http://geodata.grid.unep.ch [Accessed 7/21/2014]The UNEP environmental data explorer, as compiled from world population prospects, the 2012 revision (WPP2012), United Nations Population Division, United Nations Environment Programme.
46. WattsA.C., AmbrosiaV.G., & HinkleyE.A. (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: classification and considerations of use. Remote Sensing, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1671–1692.
47. ZhengY.-T., ZhaZ.-J., & ChuaT.-S. (2012) Mining travel patterns from geotagged photos. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3.
48. ZielstraD., & HochmairH.H. (2011) A comparative study of pedestrian accessibility to transit stations using free and proprietary network data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2217, no. 1, pp. 145–152.
49. ZielstraD., & HochmairH.H. (2012) Using free and proprietary data to compare shortest-path lengths for effective pedestrian routing in street networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2299, no. 1, pp. 41–47.
50. ZielstraD., & HochmairH.H. (2013) Positional accuracy analysis of Flickr and Panoramio images for selected world regions. Journal of Spatial Science, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 251–273.