Local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: Global comparative assessment and implications for governance

Ecology and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  German, Laura ^a,b   Schoneveld, George C ^a   Pacheco, Pablo ^a  

^a Center for International Forestry Research   (Armenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Developing countries; Environmental impacts; Global south; Social impacts

Indexed keywords

BIOFUEL; CARBON EMISSION; CIVIL SOCIETY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROP PLANT; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUROPEAN UNION; LAND USE CHANGE; NATIONAL ECONOMY; SOCIAL IMPACT;

BRAZIL; UNITED STATES;

HARNESS;

EID: 84930478482     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-04516-160429     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Achten, W. M. J., and L. V. Verchot. 2011. Implications of biodiesel-induced land-use changes for CO2 emissions: case studies in tropical America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. Ecology and Society 16(4): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04403-160414.
2. Andrade, R. M. T., and A. Miccolis. 2011. Policies and institutional and legal frameworks in the expansion of Brazilian biofuels. CIFOR Working Paper 71. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP71CIFOR.pdf.
3. Baumann, P. 2000. Equity and efficiency in contract farming schemes: the experience of agricultural tree crops. Working Paper 139. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK. [online] URL: http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/2022.pdf.
4. Cabral, L., and I. Scoones. 2006. Narratives of agricultural policy in Africa: What role for ministries of agriculture? Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. [online] URL: http://www.future-agricultures.org/pdf%20files/MoA_paper.pdf.
5. Caroko, W., H. Komarudin, K. Obidzinski, and P. Gunarso. 2011. Policy and institutional frameworks for the development of palm oil-based biodiesel in Indonesia. CIFOR Working Paper 62. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP62Komarudin.pdf.
6. Casson, A. 1999. The hesitant boom: Indonesia's oil palm sub- sector in an era of economic crisis and political change. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
7. Chin, M. 2011. Biofuels in Malaysia: an analysis of the legal and institutional framework. CIFOR Working Paper 64. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP64CIFOR.pdf
8. Colchester, M. 2011. Palm oil and indigenous peoples in South East Asia. International Land Coalition, Rome, Italy. [online] URL: http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/publication/912/FPP_Malaysia_Indonesia_web_11.03.11.pdf.
9. Colchester, M., N. Jiwan, Andiko, M. Sirait, A. Y. Firdaus, A. Surambo, and H. Pane. 2006. Promised land. Palm oil and land acquisition in Indonesia: implications for local communities and indigenous peoples. Forest Peoples Programme, Sawit Watch, HuMA and ICRAF, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2010/08/promisedlandeng.pdf.
10. Cotula, L. 2011. The outlook on farmland acquisitions. International Land Coalition, Rome, Italy. [online] URL: http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/publication/899/IIED_fatmland_web_11.03.11.pdf.
11. Cotula, L., N. Dyer, and S. Vermeulen. 2008. Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people's access to land. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
12. Dayang Norwana, A. A. B., R. Kunjappan, M. Chin, G. Schoneveld, L. Potter, and R. Andriani. In press. The local impacts of oil palm in Sabah, Malaysia: lessons for an incipient biofuel sector. CIFOR Working Paper 78. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
13. de Andrade, R. M. T., and A. Miccolis. 2011. Policies and institutional and legal frameworks in the expansion of Brazilian biofuels. CIFOR Working Paper 71. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP71CIFOR.pdf.
14. Deininger, K., and D. Byerlee. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
15. Dove, M. R. 1983. Theories of swidden agriculture, and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1 (2):85-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00596351
16. Dove, M. R. 1993. A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environmental Conservation 20(1):17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900037188
17. Ellis, F., and S. Biggs. 2001. Evolving themes in rural development 1950s-2000s. Development Policy Review 19 (4):437-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00143
18. European Commission. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/B F02176284
19. Fairhead, J., and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African landscape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
20. Fan, S., and A. Saukar. 2006. Public spending in development countries: trends, determination and impact. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
21. German, L. 2010. Local knowledge and scientific perceptions: questions of validity in environmental knowledge. Pages 99-125 in L. German, J. J. Ramisch, and R. Verma, editors. Beyond the biophysical: knowledge, culture, and power in agriculture and natural resource management. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8826-0_5
22. German, L., and G. Schoneveld. 2011. Social sustainability of EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuels: implications for rural livelihoods. CIFOR Working Paper 75. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP75German.pdf.
23. German, L., and G. Schoneveld. In press. Review of the early legal and institutional framework for biofuel investments in Zambia. Review of Policy Research.
24. German, L., G. C. Schoneveld, and D. Gumbo. 2011. The local social and environmental impacts of smallholder-based biofuel investments in Zambia. Ecology and Society 16(4): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04280-160412
25. German, L., G. Schoneveld, and E. Mwangi. 2011. Processes of large-scale land acquisition by investors: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing (Brighton, UK, April 6-8, 2011). Future Agricultures Consortium, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. [online] URL: http://www.future-agricultures.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=1268&Itemid=971.
26. Glover, D., and K. Kusterer. 1990. Small farmers, big business: contract farming and rural development. Macmillan, London, UK.
27. Goldsmith, A. 1985. The private sector and rural development: Can agribusiness help the small farmer? World Development 13(10-11):1125-1138.
28. Hazell, P., C. Poulton, S. Wiggins, and A. Dorward. 2007. The future of small farms for poverty reduction and growth. 2020 Discussion Paper 42. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
29. High Level Panel of Experts. 2011. Land tenure and international investments in agriculture. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. [online] URL: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE-Land-tenure-and-international-investments-in-agriculture-2011. pdf.
30. Holmes, D. A. 2002. Indonesia: Where have all the forests gone? World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
31. Japan Ministry of the Environment. 2011. History of EIA systems and measures taken around the world. Japan Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo, Japan. [online] URL: http://wwwenv.go.jp/earth/coop/coop/document/10-eiae/10-eiae-2.pdf.
32. Johnson, F. X., and F. Rosillo-Calle. 2007. Biomass, livelihoods and international trade: challenges and opportunities for the EU and southern Africa. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
33. Kherallah, M., C. Delgado, E. Gabre-Madhin, N. Minot, and M. Johnson. 2000. The road half traveled: agricultural market reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy Report 10. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D. C., USA. [online] URL: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAC R621.pdf.
34. Koh, L. P., and D. S. Wilcove. 2008. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation Letters 1(2):60-64.
35. Krueger, A. 1990. Government failures in development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(3):9-23.
36. Kull, C. A. 2004. Isle of fire: the political ecology of landscape burning in Madagascar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
37. Lapola, D. M., R. Schaldach, J. Alcamo, A. Bondeau, J. Koch, C. Koelking, and J. A. Priess. 2010. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (8):3388-3393.
38. Lima, M., M. Skutsch, and G. de Medeiros Costa. 2011. Deforestation and the social impacts of soy for biodiesel: perspectives of farmers in the South Brazilian Amazon. Ecology and Society 16(4): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04366-160404
39. May, P. H., B. Millikan, and M. F. Gebara. 2011. The context of REDD+ in Brazil: drivers, agents and institutions. CIFOR Occasional Paper 55. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-55.pdf.
40. Nepstad, D., B. S. Soares-Filho, F. Merry, A. Lima, P. Moutinho, J. Carter, M. Bowman, A. Cattaneo, H. Rodrigues, S. Schwartzman, D. G. McGrath, C. M. Stickler, R. Lubowski, P. Piris-Cabezas, S. Rivero, A. Alencar, O. Almeida, and O. Stella. 2009. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 4(326):1350-1351.
41. Nhantumbo, I., and A. Salomão. 2010. Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Mozambique. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK. [online] URL: http://pubs.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/12563IIED.pdf.
42. Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
43. Pacheco, P., L. German, J. W. van Gelder, K. Weinberger, and M. R. Guariguata. 2011. Avoiding deforestation in the context of biofuel feedstock expansion: an analysis of the effectiveness of market-based instruments. CIFOR Working Paper 73. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP73Pacheco.pdf.
44. Pleven, R. J., M. O'Hare, A. D. Jones, M. S. Torn, and H. K. Gibbs. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environmental Science and Technology 44(21):8015-8021.
45. Poulton, C., G. Tyler, P. Hazell, A. Dorward, J. Kydd, and M. Stockbridge. 2008. Commercial agriculture in Africa: lessons from success and failure. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRICA/Resources/257994-1215457178567/CCAA_Success_failure. pdf.
46. Reijnders, L., and M. A. J. Huijbregts. 2008. Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(4):477-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.054
47. Republic of Mozambique. 1997. Lei de Terras. Republic of Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
48. Romero-Hernández, O., O. Masera, S. Romero, and M. Grunstein. 2011. Legal and institutional frameworks at national and subnational levels for biofuel promotion in Mexico. CIFOR Working Paper 63. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP63CIFOR.pdf
49. Romijn, H. A. 2011. Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from jatropha biofuels on African miombo woodlands. Energy Policy 39(10):5751-5762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.041
50. Sadler, B. 1996. Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Final Report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and International Association for Impact Assessment, Ottawa, Canada.
51. Sawyer, D. 2008. Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363(1498):1747-1752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0030
52. Schoneveld, G., and L. German. 2010. Large-scale land acquisitions for biofuels: analysis of the Ghanaian policy, legal, and institutional framework. Unpublished project report. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
53. Schoneveld, G. C., L. A. German, and E. Nutakor. 2011. Land- based investments for rural development? A grounded analysis of the local impacts of biofuel feedstock plantations in Ghana. Ecology and Society 16(4): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04424-160410
54. Schoneveld, G., and D. Gumbo. 2010. The sun rises in the East: the impact of Zimbabwe's new allegiance to China. Unpublished project report. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
55. Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R. A. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T.-H. Yu. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319 (5867):1238-1240.
56. Sitoe, A. 2009. Governação florestal em Niassa: o caso de muembe, sanga, lago e cuamba. Associação Rural de Ajuda Mútua, Maputo, Mozambique.
57. Skutsch, M., E. de los Rios, S. Solis, E. Riegelhaupt, D. Hinojosa, S. Gerfert, Y. Gao, and O. Masera. 2011. Jatropha in Mexico: environmental and social impacts of an incipient biofuel program. Ecology and Society 16(4): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04448-160411
58. U.S. Congress. 2007. Energy independence and security act of 2007. U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ140.110.pdf.
59. Valentino, S. 2011. Tanzania biofuel project's barren promise. IPS-Inter Press Service, Rome, Italy. [online] URL: http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=54783.
60. van der Meer, C. L. J. 2006. Exclusion of small-scale farmers from coordinated supply chains: market failure, policy failure or just economies of scale? Pages 209-217 in R. Ruben, M. Slingerland, and H. Nijhoff, editors. Agro-food chains and networks for development. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
61. van Gelder, J.W., and L. German. 2011. Biofuel finance: global trends in biofuel finance in forest-rich countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America and implications for governance. CIFOR Infobrief 36. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/infobrief/3340-infobrief.pdf.
62. Vermeulen, S., and L. Cotula. 2010. Making the most of agricultural investment: a survey of business models that provide opportunities for smallholders. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK. [online] URL: http://pubs.iied.org/12566IIED.html.
63. von Braun, J., and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2009. Land grabbing by foreign investors in developing countries: risks and opportunities. Policy Brief 13. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL:http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/bp013all.pdf.
64. Zen, Z., C. Barlow, and R. Gondowarsito. 2005. Oil palm in Indonesian socio-economic improvement: a review of options. RSPAS Working Paper 2005-11. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. [online] URL: http://www.crawford.anu.edu.au/acde/publications/publish/papers/wp2005/ wp-econ-2005-11.pdf