Endothelial cell counts after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 537-544

  Ang, Marcus ^a,b   Mehta, Jodhbir S ^a,b,c,d   Anshu, Arundhati ^a,b   Wong, Hon Kiat ^e   Htoon, Hla M ^b   Tan, Donald ^a,b,c  

^a SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^c National University Health Systems   (Singapore)

^d DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^e TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; Endothelial cell count; Penetrating keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

AGENTS ACTING ON THE EYE; ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT; CEFAZOLIN; DEXAMETHASONE; GENTAMICIN; STEROID;

ACUTE GRAFT REJECTION; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; ASTIGMATISM; CELL COUNT; CHOROID HEMORRHAGE; CONGENITAL CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EPITHELIOPATHY; EYE DISEASE; EYE SYNECHIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HERPES SIMPLEX; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; KERATITIS; KERATOPATHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 84930473834     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S26343     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tan DT, Anshu A, Mehta JS. Paradigm shifts in corneal transplantation. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009;38(4):332-338.
2. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial keratoplasty-a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38(2):128-140.
3. Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1818-1830.
4. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(4):290-294.
5. Rao SK, Leung CK, Cheung CY, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: effect of the surgical procedure on corneal optics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(6):991-996.
6. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(3):411-418.
7. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(11): 1936-1942.
8. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):857-865.
9. Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8):1133-1137.
10. Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, Price FW Jr. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):725-729.
11. Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):488-496, e3.
12. Terry MA, Shamie N, Straiko MD, Friend DJ, Davis-Boozer D. Endothelial keratoplasty: the relationship between donor tissue storage time and donor endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(1):36-40.
13. Mehta JS, Por YM, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(11):1846-1850.
14. Tan DT, Janardhanan P, Zhou H, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(6):975-998, e1.
15. Holladay JT. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(2):287-290.
16. Mehta JS, Por YM, Poh R, Beuerman RW, Tan D. Comparison of donor insertion techniques for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(10):1383-1388.
17. Mehta JS, Hantera MM, Tan DT. Modified air-assisted descemetorhexis for Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):889-891.
18. Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, Htoon HM, Tan DT. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):744-751, e1.
19. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA, et al. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(3):438-444.
20. Hjortdal J, Ehlers N. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(3):310-314.
21. Nanavaty MA, Shortt AJ. Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7:CD008420.
22. Chen ES, Shamie N, Terry MA, Phillips PM. Busin glide vs forceps in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: not all forceps insertions are created equal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):175.
23. Beckingsale P, Mavrikakis I, Al-Yousuf N, Mavrikakis E, Daya SM. Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared with national data. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(6):728-731.
24. Lim L, Pesudovs K, Coster DJ. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(6):1125-1131.
25. Barkana Y, Segal O, Krakovski D, Avni I, Zadok D. Prediction of visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for pseudophakic corneal edema. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):286-290.
26. Khor WB, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):223-232, e2.