Nanotechnology and global regulation

Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 261-280

  Bowman, Diana M ^a,b   Hodge, Graeme A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930460775     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (106)

1. Abbott, K.W., G.E. Marchant, and D.J. Sylvester. 2006. A framework convention for nanotechnology? Environmental Law Reporter 36: 10931-942.
2. Abbott, K.W., D.J. Sylvester, and G.E. Marchant. 2010. Transnational regulation of nanotechnology: Reality or romanticism? In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 525-44. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
3. Allianz Centre for Technology. 2005. Small Sizes That Matter: Opportunities and Risks of Nanotechnologies. Paris: OECD International Futures Programme.
4. Altmann, J. 2010. Military applications: Special conditions for regulation. In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 372-87. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5. Australian Government. 2006. Request for Tender: Review of Possible Impacts of Nanotechnology on Australia's Regulatory Frameworks. Canberra: DIITR.
6. Ayres, I. and J. Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Balbus, J.M. et al. 2006. Getting it right the first time-Developing nanotechnology while protecting workers, public health and the environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1076: 331-42.
8. Black, J. 2002. Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27: 1-36
9. Bowman, D.M. and G.A. Hodge. 2009. Counting on codes: An examination of transnational codes as a regulatory governance mechanism for nanotechnologies. Regulation and Governance 3(2): 145-64.
10. Bowman, D.M., G. van Calster, and S. Friedrichs. 2010. Nanomaterials and the regulation of cosmetics. Nature Nanotechnology 5(2): 92
11. Braithwaite, J. 1982. Enforced self-regulation: A new strategy for corporate crime control. Michigan Law Review 80(7): 1466-1507.
12. Braithwaite, J. 1993. Responsive regulation for Australia. In Business Regulation and Australia's Future, edited by P.N. Grabosky and J. Braithwaite, 81-96. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
13. Braithwaite, J. 2008. Regulatory Capitalism-How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. Breggin, L. et al. 2009. Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies: Towards Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
15. Brownsword, R. 2010. The age of regulatory governance and nanotechnologies. In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 60-80. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (CDTSC). 2009. Chemical Information Call-In: Carbon Nanotubes, 22 January. Sacramento: DTSC.
17. Chaudhry, Q. et al. 2006. Final Report: A Scoping Study to Identify Gaps in Environmental Regulation for the Products and Applications of Nanotechnologies. London: DEFRA.
18. Chaudhry, Q. et al. 2007. Nanotechnology regulation: Developments in the United Kingdom. In New Global Regulatory Frontiers in Regulation: The Age of Nanotechnology, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and K. Ludlow, 212-38. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19. Chen, H. and M.C. Roco. 2008. Mapping Nanotechnology Innovations and Knowledge. New York: Springer.
20. Davies, C. 2006. Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology Washington, D.C.: Project on Emerging Technologies.
21. Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). 2006. UK Voluntary Reporting Scheme for Engineered Nanoscale Materials. London: DEFRA.
22. D'Silva, J. and G. van Calster. 2009. Taking temperature: A review of European Union regulation in nanomedicine. European Journal of Health Law 16: 249-69.
23. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2007. EPA Nanotechnology White Paper. Washington, D.C.: Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency by members of the Nanotechnology Workgroup.
24. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008. Notice: Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program. Federal Register 73(18): 4861-66.
25. Epprecht, T.K. 2010. Product safety or managing risks? How regulatory paradigms affect insurability. In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 163-74. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
26. ETC Group. 2002. No Small Matter! Nanotech Particles Penetrate Living Cells and Accumulate in Animal Organs. Communiqué Issue # 76, May. Ottawa: ETC Group.
27. ETC Group. 2003. No Small Matter II: The Case for a Global Moratorium Size Matters! Ottawa: ETC Group.
28. European Commission (EC). 2005. Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005-2009. Brussels: European Parliament.
29. European Commission (EC). 2008. Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials and Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials: Summary of Legislation in Relation to Health, Safety and Environment Aspects of Nanomaterials, Regulatory Research Needs and Related Measures. Brussels: European Commission.
30. European Commission (EC). 2009. Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005-2009. Second Implementation Report 2007-2009 (COM[2009]607 final). Brussels: European Commission.
31. European Parliament (EP). 2009. MEPs Approve New Rules on Safer Cosmetics. Press release, 24 March. Brussels: EP.
32. Fiedler, F.A. and G.H. Reynolds. 1994. Legal problems of nanotechnology: An overview. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 3: 594-629.
33. Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). 2008. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on the Application of Nanotechnologies in the Food and Agriculture Sectors: Potential Food Safety Implications. Rome: FAO and WHO.
34. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2007. Nanotechnology-A Report of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Nanotechnology Task Force. Washington, D.C.: FDA.
35. Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI). 2008. The Relevance for Food Safety of Applications of Nanotechnology in the Food and Feed Industries. Dublin: FSAI.
36. Food Standards Agency. 2008. A Review of the Potential Implications of Nanotechnologies for Regulations and Risk Assessment in Relation to Food. London: FSA.
37. Forrest, D. 1989. Regulating Nanotechnology Development. Available at http://www.foresight.org/nano/Forrest1989.html (accessed 31 July 2011).
38. Friends of the Earth Australia (FoEA). 2006a. An Analysis by Friends of the Earth of the National Nanotechnology Strategy Taskforce Report: "Options for a National Nanotechnology Strategy." Melbourne: FoEA.
39. Friends of the Earth Australia (FoEA). 2006b. Nanomaterials, Sunscreens and Cosmetics: Small Ingredients, Big Risks. Melbourne: FoEA and FoEUS.
40. Friends of the Earth Australia (FoEA). 2007. Nanosilver-A Threat to Soil, Water and Human Health? Melbourne: FoEA.
41. Fuhr, M. et al. 2006. Legal Appraisal of Nanotechnology: Existing Legal Frameworks, the Need for Regulation and Regulative Options at a European and National Level. Darmstadt: Society for Institutional Analysis.
42. Gergely, A. 2007. Regulation of Nanotechnology-within REACH? NanoNow (February): 44-46
43. Gilligan, G. and D.M. Bowman. 2008. "Netting Nano": Regulatory challenges of the Internet and nanotechnologies. International Review of Law Computer and Technology 22(3): 231-46.
44. Glaeser, E.L. and A. Shleifer. 2003. The Rise of the Regulatory State. Boston: Harvard University
45. Gunningham, N. and J. Rees. 1997. Industry self-regulation: An institutional perspective. Law and Policy 19(4): 363-414.
46. Gunningham, N. and D. Sinclair. 1999. Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law and Policy 21(1): 49-76.
47. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). 2003. Health and Safety Regulations: A Short Guide. London: HSE.
48. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). 2006. Review of the Adequacy of Current Regulatory Regimes to Secure Effective Regulation of Nanoparticles Created by Nanotechnology: The Regulations Covered by HSE. London: HSE
49. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee (STC). 2009. Call for Evidence: Nanotechnologies and Food. London: United Kingdom Parliament.
50. Hull, M. 2009. Nanotechnology environmental, health and safety: A guide for small business. In Nanotechnology Risk Management, edited by M. Hull and D.M Bowman, 243-97. London: Springer.
51. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). 2006. White Paper on Nanotechnology Risk Governance-Towards an Integrative Approach. Geneva: IRGC.
52. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). 2009. Appropriate Risk Governance Strategies for Nanotechnology Applications in Food and Cosmetics. Geneva: IRGC.
53. Intellectual Property Office. 2009. UK Innovation Nanotechnology Patent Landscape Analysis. London: IPO.
54. Kimbrell, G.A. 2006. Nanomaterial consumer products and FDA Regulation: Regulatory challenges and necessary amendments. Nanotechnology Law and Business 3(3): 329-38.
55. King, A.A. and M.J. Lenox. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 698-716.
56. Levi-Faur, D. and J. Jordana. 2005. The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new order. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 598(1): 12-32.
57. Ludlow, K. 2007. One size fits all? Australian regulation of nanoparticle exposure in the workplace. Journal of Law and Medicine 15: 136-52.
58. Ludlow, K., D.M. Bowman, and G.A. Hodge. 2007. A Review of Possible Impacts of Nanotechnology on Australia's Regulatory Framework. Melbourne: Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies.
59. Ludlow, K., D.M. Bowman, and D. Kirk. 2009. Hitting the mark or falling short with nanotechnologies regulation? Trends in Biotechnology 27(11): 615-20.
60. Lux Research Inc. 2005. Nanotechnology: Where Does the US Stand? Testimony before the Research Subcommittee of the House Committee on Science. New York: Lux Research.
61. Majone, G., 1999. The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics 22(1): 1-24.
62. Marchant, G.E. and D.J. Sylvester. 2006. Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34(4): 714-25.
63. Marchant, G.E., D.J. Sylvester, and K.W. Abbott. 2007. Nanotechnology regulation: The United States approach. In New Global Regulatory Frontiers in Regulation: The Age of Nanotechnology, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and K. Ludlow, 189-211. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64. Marchant, G.E., D.J. Sylvester, and K.W. Abbott. 2008. Risk management principles for nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2(1): 43-60.
65. Mayer Brown. 2009. EU Competition-Brussels Client Alert: France Might Take the Lead on Nanotechnology Regulation. 5 March. Brussels: Mayer Brown.
66. Maynard, A.D. et al. 2006. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444: 267-69.
67. Meili, C. and M. Widmer. 2010. Voluntary measures in nanotechnology risk governance: The difficulty of holding the wolf by the ears. In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 446-61. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
68. Miles, J. 2007. Metrology and standards for nanotechnology. In New Global Regulatory Frontiers in Regulation: The Age of Nanotechnology, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and K. Ludlow, 333-52. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
69. Miles, J. 2010. Nanotechnology captured. In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 83-106. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
70. Miller, G. and G. Scrinis. 2010. The role of NGOs in governing nanotechnologies: Challenging the "benefits versus risks" framing of nanotech innovation. In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by G.A. Hodge, D.M. Bowman, and A.D. Maynard, 409-45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
71. Miller, G. and R. Senjen. 2008. Out of the Laboratory and on to Our Plates: Nanotechnology in Food and Agriculture. Melbourne: FoEA, FoEEU, and FoEUS.
72. Minogue, M. and L. Carino. 2006. Introduction. In Regulatory Governance in Developing Countries, edited by M. Minogue and L. Carino, 3-16. CRC Series on Competition, Regulation and Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
73. Monica, J.C. and G. van Calster. 2010. A nanotechnology legal framework. In Nanotechnology Risk Management, edited by M. Hull and D.M. Bowman, 97-140. London: Springer.
74. Moran, A. 1995. Tools of environmental policy: Market instruments versus command-and-control. In Markets, the State and the Environment: Towards Integration, edited by R. Eckersley. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.
75. Moran, M. 2002. Understanding the regulatory state. British Journal of Political Science 32: 391-413.
76. Munich Re Group. 2002. Nanotechnology-What Is in Store for Us? Munich: Munchen Re.
77. NanoAction. 2007. Principles for the Oversight of Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials. Washington, D.C.: International Center for Technology Assessment.
78. National Industrial Chemical Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS). 2007. Summary of Call for Information and the Use of Nanomaterials. Canberra: Australian Government.
79. National Industrial Chemical Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS). 2008. Industrial nanomaterials: Voluntary call for information 2008. Australian Government Gazette No. C 10 (7 October): 25-38.
80. National Industrial Chemical Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS). 2009. Proposal for Regulatory Reform of Industrial Nanomaterials: Public Discussion Paper-November 2009. Canberra: NICNAS.
81. National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Global Networks and Local Vales-A Comparative Look at Germany and the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
82. New South Wales Legislative Council Standing Committee on State Development (NSW LCSCSD). 2008. Nanotechnology in NSW. Sydney: NSW Legislative Council.
83. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2007. OECD Working Party on Nanotechnology (WPN): Vision Statement. Paris: OECD.
84. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2008. Nanotechnologies at the OECD. Paris: OECD.
85. Pelley, J. and M. Saner. 2009. International Approaches to the Regulatory Governance of Nanotechnology. Ottawa: Carleton University.
86. Pinson, R. 2004. Is nanotechnology prohibited by the biological and chemical weapons conventions? Berkeley Journal of International Law 22(2): 279-309.
87. Powell, K. 2004. Green groups baulk at joining nanotechnology talks. Nature 432(7013): 5.
88. Rees, J. 1997. Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy 19(4): 477-528.
89. Renn, O. and M.C. Roco. 2006. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8: 153-91.
90. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. 2008. Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology. London: Royal Commission.
91. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (RS-RAE). 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London: RS-RAE.
92. Royal Society, Insight Investment, Nanotechnology Industries Association, Nanotechnology Knowledge Transfer Network (RSIINIA, NKTN). 2007. Responsible Nanotechnologies Code: Consultation Draft-17 September 2007 (Version 5). London: Responsible NanoCode Working Group.
93. Sadrieh, N. and P. Espandiari. 2006. Nanotechnology and the FDA: What are the scientific and regulatory considerations for products containing nanomaterials? Nanotechnology Law and Business 3(3): 339-49.
94. Sinclair, D. 1997. Self-regulation versus command and control? Beyond false dichotomies. Law and Policy 19(4): 529-59.
95. Sunstein, C. 1990. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Boston: Harvard University Press.
96. Swiss Re. 2004. Nanotechnology: Small Matter, Many Unknowns. Geneva: Swiss Re.
97. Taylor, M.R. 2006. Regulating the Products of Nanotechnology: Does FDA Have the Tools It Needs? Washington, D.C.: Project on Emerging Technologies.
98. Taylor, M.R. 2008. Assuring the Safety of Nanomaterials in Food Packaging: The Regulatory Process and Key Issues. Washington, D.C.: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
99. United Nations Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. 2009. Ongoing Work on the Safety of Nanomaterials. Geneva: UN.
100. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2006. The Ethics and Politics of Nanotechnology. Paris: UNESCO.
101. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2007. Nanotechnology and Ethics: Policies and Actions-COMEST Policy Recommendations. Paris: World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology.
102. Utting, P. 2005. Rethinking Business Regulation-From Self-Regulation to Social Control. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
103. Vogel, D. 2006. The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct. Berkeley: University of California.
104. Wardark, A. 2003. Nanotechnology and Regulation: A Case Study using the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). Washington, D.C.: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
105. Webb, K. 2004. Understanding the voluntary code phenomenon. In Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest, and Innovation, edited by K. Webb, 3-32. Ottawa: Carleton University.
106. Webb, K. and A. Morrison. 1996. The Legal Aspects of Voluntary Codes. Paper presented at the Exploring Voluntary Codes in the Marketplace Symposium, 12-13 September, Ottawa.